www-ws-desc@w3.org from March 2002 by date

Monday, 1 April 2002

• Re: Should a Service Implement a Single PortType? Sanjiva Weerawarana
• Re: alternative format for WSDL that is SOAP compatible Aleksander Slominski

Saturday, 30 March 2002

• Re: RDF mapping for WSDL Uche Ogbuji

Friday, 29 March 2002

• RE: Higher-level support for SOAP extensions/modules Jonathan Marsh
• Web Services Description Working Group 2002-03-21 meeting minutes Jonathan Marsh
• Re: Should a Service Implement a Single PortType? Jacek Kopecky
• RE: Higher-level support for SOAP extensions/modules Keith Ballinger

Thursday, 28 March 2002

• Should a Service Implement a Single PortType? Arthur Ryman
• REQ: Higher-level support for SOAP extensions/modules Glen Daniels

Wednesday, 27 March 2002

• Usecases Sadiq, Waqar
• Re: SOAP 1.2 consolidated requirements Jean-Jacques Moreau
• Re: RDF mapping for WSDL Uche Ogbuji
• W3C Web Service Description WG: Requirements Jeffrey Schlimmer

Tuesday, 26 March 2002

• RE: SOAP 1.2 consolidated requirements Jeffrey Schlimmer

Monday, 25 March 2002

• RE: Bindings Sandeep Kumar

Friday, 22 March 2002

• Web Services Description Working Group 2002-03-07 meeting minutes Jonathan Marsh
• Web Services Description Working Group 2002-03-14 meeting minutes Jonathan Marsh
• Re: Bindings Prasad Yendluri

Thursday, 21 March 2002

• RE: Bindings Sandeep Kumar
• Re: Bindings Prasad Yendluri
• RE: Bindings Sandeep Kumar
• Re: Bindings Prasad Yendluri
• Bindings Sandeep Kumar
• RE: Requirements: Describing WS Capabilities Sandeep Kumar
• Use Cases Document Sandeep Kumar
• RE: Requirements: Describing WS Capabilities Krishna Sankar
• Definitions David Booth
• Requirements: Describing WS Capabilities Sandeep Kumar

Wednesday, 20 March 2002

• WSCL submission Hugo Haas
• Re: SOAP 1.2 consolidated requirements Jean-Jacques Moreau
• W3C Web Service Description WG: Requirements Jeffrey Schlimmer
• RE: SOAP 1.2 consolidated requirements Jeffrey Schlimmer

Tuesday, 19 March 2002

• RE: Definitions David Booth
• RE: Definitions Krishna Sankar
• Re: Definitions David Booth

Monday, 18 March 2002

• RE: Definitions David Orchard
• Definitions David Booth
• RE: Our future course (Was: Re: WS-I) Malu, Pallavi G

Friday, 15 March 2002

• RE: Our future course (Was: Re: WS-I) Jeff Mischkinsky
• RE: Our future course (Was: Re: WS-I) Jeff Mischkinsky
• Re: Our future course (Was: Re: WS-I) Roberto Chinnici
• RE: Our future course (Was: Re: WS-I) Champion, Mike
• RE: Our future course (Was: Re: WS-I) Anne Thomas Manes
• Re: SOAP 1.2 consolidated requirements Jean-Jacques Moreau
• Re: Our future course (Was: Re: WS-I) Jeff Mischkinsky
• RE: Our future course (Was: Re: WS-I) Dave Hollander

Thursday, 14 March 2002

• Re: SOAP 1.2 consolidated requirements ryman@ca.ibm.com
• RE: Our future course (Was: Re: WS-I) Rosimildo daSIlva
• RE: Our future course (Was: Re: WS-I) Anne Thomas Manes
• RE: Our future course (Was: Re: WS-I) Sadiq, Waqar
• Re: WS-I ryman@ca.ibm.com
• Re: WS-I Jeff Mischkinsky
• Regrets for 3/21 Conference Call don@lexmark.com
• Our future course (Was: Re: WS-I) Jacek Kopecky
• WS-I Stumbo, William K
• SOAP 1.2 consolidated requirements Jean-Jacques Moreau
• Usecases Sadiq, Waqar

Wednesday, 13 March 2002

• Re: Draft of Definitions Jean-Jacques Moreau
• Re: Draft of Definitions ryman@ca.ibm.com
• RE: Draft of Definitions Anne Thomas Manes
• RE: Draft of Definitions Glen Daniels
• RE: Draft of Definitions Jacek Kopecky
• RE: Draft of Definitions Glen Daniels
• Re: Draft of Definitions Jacek Kopecky
• RE: Draft of Definitions Jacek Kopecky
• RE: Draft of Definitions Steve Graham
• Re: Draft of Definitions Jean-Jacques Moreau
• Re: Reqs extracted from xmlp req list Jean-Jacques Moreau
• RE: Draft of Definitions Keith Ballinger
• W3C Web Service Description WG: Requirements Jeffrey Schlimmer
• RE: Reqs extracted from xmlp req list Jeffrey Schlimmer
• RE: DR109: Interfaces separate from concrete deployment Jeffrey Schlimmer
• RE: Draft of Definitions Krishna Sankar
• RE: Draft of Definitions Keith Ballinger
• RE: Draft of Definitions Fred Carter
• RE: Draft of Definitions Keith Ballinger
• RE: Draft of Definitions Krishna Sankar

Tuesday, 12 March 2002

• Draft of Definitions David Booth
• Re: DR109: Interfaces separate from concrete deployment Jean-Jacques Moreau
• Re: Reqs extracted from xmlp req list Jean-Jacques Moreau

Monday, 11 March 2002

• RE: Suggested simplifications to Simplicity Requirements Austin, Daniel
• RE: Introduction - apologies Vadhri, Srinivas
• Introduction Vadhri, Srinivas

Thursday, 7 March 2002

• Web Services Description Working Group 2002-02-28 meeting minutes Jonathan Marsh
• Re: Reqs DR033/DR034 FABLET Youenn
• RE: Suggested simplifications to Simplicity Requirements Keith Ballinger
• RE: Suggested simplifications to Simplicity Requirements Stumbo, William K

Wednesday, 6 March 2002

• Reqs DR033/DR034 FABLET Youenn

Tuesday, 5 March 2002

• Another way at looking at RDF interfaces Mark Baker
• Re: Reference requirements Paul Prescod
• W3C Web Service Description WG: Requirements Jeffrey Schlimmer
• DR109: Interfaces separate from concrete deployment Jeffrey Schlimmer
• RE: Suggested simplifications to Simplicity Requirements David Booth

Monday, 4 March 2002

• RE: Reference requirements Krishna Sankar

Saturday, 2 March 2002

• Suggested simplifications to Simplicity Requirements David Booth

Friday, 1 March 2002

• Re: Reference requirements Paul Prescod
• RE: Reference requirements Liu, Kevin
• Regrets for March 7, conference call Tom Jordahl
• RE: Web Services Description Working Group 2002-02-21 meeting min u Tom Jordahl
• Re: Reference requirements Paul Prescod

Last message date: Sunday, 31 March 2002 23:16:42 UTC