- From: Paul Prescod <paul@prescod.net>
- Date: Tue, 05 Mar 2002 07:01:57 -0800
- To: Krishna Sankar <ksankar@cisco.com>
- CC: www-ws-desc@w3.org
Krishna Sankar wrote: > >... > Here are some of my thoughts : > > 1. Re. the PO example, I assume you are talking about passing reference as > a parameter - for example a UUID or some form of conversation ID. Of course > this is domain specific (could be a string, an integer, a multi part complex > object, ...). IMHO is outside the WSDL scope as it is like any normal > parameter. No, it is not domain specific. The web has an addressing mechanism that can address anything no matter how complex: the URL/URI. >... > 2. The object references is a software artifact (as compared to a business > artifact which is what #1 is) and that could be in our domain to solve. Er, don't follow... > 3. Another point that stands out is the TTL which needs to be defined, > monitored and handled Not really. You can leave that to another specification. > 4. What about validation ? Most probably none, as we really cannot make any > intelligent conclusions (except when we dereference it) You validate it when you dereference it! That's no different than validating the return value from a method call after you call it. Paul Prescod
Received on Tuesday, 5 March 2002 10:05:09 UTC