- From: Jean-Jacques Moreau <moreau@crf.canon.fr>
- Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2002 15:08:02 +0100
- To: Jeffrey Schlimmer <jeffsch@windows.microsoft.com>
- CC: www-ws-desc@w3.org
Is this to be read as the same interface describes the protocol etc. separetely, or the service is described by two separate "interfaces"? I.e. is there a single XML file with two children information items, or are there two separate XML files (or are both alternatives supported by this new requirement)? I missed the last conference call, so I apologize in advance if this has been addressed already. Jean-Jacques. Jeffrey Schlimmer wrote: > During the last teleconference, the WG agreed to remove the derivations > / inheritance issue from DR033 and DR034 and combine the two > requirements into a single one that clarified the requirement to > abstract from transport and wire format specifics. Below is proposed > wording for that requirement. Comments welcome. > > DR109 [MUST] The language must describe interfaces separate from their > concrete protocol, transport, data format or wire format deployment. > (See also DR046.) > > --Jeff
Received on Tuesday, 12 March 2002 09:09:54 UTC