- From: Prasad Yendluri <pyendluri@webmethods.com>
- Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2002 16:10:11 -0800
- To: www-ws-desc@w3.org
Received on Thursday, 21 March 2002 19:07:35 UTC
Hi Sandeep, > I know that the word *contract* has other meanings and QoS is just one > such thing. :) So Service Quality Binding is not broad enough. > I think it is important to have a separate *container* to hold some of > the meta information, and that is the intent. Agree. However, I don't know if I consider QoS meta information. Can you be more specific on the other meta information you are alluding to (an example would help)? > Does Service Semantics Bindings make more sense to you? > sandeep Regards, Prasad
Received on Thursday, 21 March 2002 19:07:35 UTC