Re: WS-I

At 10:34 AM 3/14/02, Stumbo, William K wrote:
>I didn't detect any clear direction on WS-I coming out of today's telephone
>conference.  It seems we've currently tied any working relationship to the
>definition of our scope.
>
> From the comments made by those involved with WS-I (Arthur?), it seems to me
>that we can probably craft some sort of working relationship that benefits
>both parties.  Whether we need to formalize a relationship, I can't say.
>
>I'd like to suggest, as a way of making progress, that the WS-I members put
>a proposal for a relationship on the table.  We  can debate the merits of
>working together until we're blue in the face.  Lets focus the discussion
>around a specific proposal and see where that goes.

This is an excellent idea!! As a WS-I Board member I'm more than happt to 
facilitate this course of action.

I'll take an action item to get the newly formed WS-I Board liaison 
committee to talk about doing this as well.

cheers,
    jeff


>What information could the WG expect from WS-I?  How should we expect to use
>it?  What can we provide WS-I that would help their mission?
>
>Bill Stumbo
>Xerox Research & Technology
>Solutions & Services Technology Center
>
>wstumbo@crt.xerox.com
>     Phone:      585.422.0616
>     Fax:        585.265.8424

--
Jeff Mischkinsky                    jeff.mischkinsky@oracle.com
Consulting Member Technical Staff   +1(650)506-1975 (voice)
Oracle Corporation                  +1(650)506-7225 (fax)
400 Oracle Parkway, M/S 4OP960
Redwood Shores, CA 94065 USA

Received on Thursday, 14 March 2002 15:00:21 UTC