www-i18n-comments@w3.org from September 2006 by author

Addison Phillips

Re: [Comment on ITS WD] xml:lang = language info, please (Friday, 22 September)
Re: [Comment on ITS WD] xml:lang = language info, please (Thursday, 21 September)
Re: [Comment on ITS WD] RFC 3066bis (Monday, 11 September)

Felix Sasaki

Re: [Comment on ITS WD] Existing ruby markup (Thursday, 28 September)
RE: [Comment on ITS WD] Translatability (Friday, 22 September)
Re: [Comment on ITS WD] xml:lang = language info, please (Friday, 22 September)
Re: [Comment on ITS WD] ITS markup must be integrated (Monday, 11 September)
Re: [Comment on ITS WD] Example 14 dir (Monday, 11 September)
Re: [Comment on ITS WD] Example 14 translate (Monday, 11 September)
Re: [Comment on ITS WD] Spell out the attributes (Monday, 11 September)
Re: [Comment on ITS WD] Example 19 xml:lang (Monday, 11 September)
Re: [Comment on ITS WD] xml:lang missing (Monday, 11 September)
Re: [Comment on ITS WD] xml:lang = language info, please (Monday, 11 September)
Re: [Comment on ITS WD] Example 32 head (Monday, 11 September)
Re: [Comment on ITS WD] in the case of no selection (Monday, 11 September)
Re: [Comment on ITS WD] rubyText is an attribute (Monday, 11 September)
Re: [Comment on ITS WD] Make the application of legacy ruby clearer (Monday, 11 September)
Re: [Comment on ITS WD] Use Japanese in Example 31 (Monday, 11 September)
Re: [Comment on ITS WD] Example 31 lacks rp (Monday, 11 September)
Re: [Comment on ITS WD] Default is ltr (Monday, 11 September)
Re: [Comment on ITS WD] Refer to bidi article (Monday, 11 September)
Re: [Comment on ITS WD] Some Hebrew quotation (Monday, 11 September)
Re: [Comment on ITS WD] Avoid xml:lang='he' (Monday, 11 September)
Re: [Comment on ITS WD] Is dir mandatory? (Monday, 11 September)
Re: [Comment on ITS WD] Repetition (Monday, 11 September)
Re: [Comment on ITS WD] No implementation section (Monday, 11 September)
Re: [Comment on ITS WD] Standardised wording (Monday, 11 September)
Re: [Comment on ITS WD] Hard to know what this is about (Monday, 11 September)
Re: [Comment on ITS WD] Allowing for xpath expressions to point to term definitions (Monday, 11 September)
Re: [Comment on ITS WD] termInfoRef should allow for id strings (Monday, 11 September)
Re: [Comment on ITS WD] termInfoRefPointer referant's data (Monday, 11 September)
Re: [Comment on ITS WD] Pointing to terms (Monday, 11 September)
Re: [Comment on ITS WD] Role of termInfo (Monday, 11 September)
Re: [Comment on ITS WD] Marks terms and meanings (Monday, 11 September)
Re: [Comment on ITS WD] Attribute used for locInfo (Monday, 11 September)
Re: [Comment on ITS WD] Example 24 (Monday, 11 September)
Re: [Comment on ITS WD] Explanations for examples (Monday, 11 September)
Re: [Comment on ITS WD] Examples 22 and 23 (Monday, 11 September)
Re: [Comment on ITS WD] Loc Info or Loc Note (Monday, 11 September)
Re: [Comment on ITS WD] Use of elements (Monday, 11 September)
Re: [Comment on ITS WD] Mention translation tools (Monday, 11 September)
Re: [Comment on ITS WD] 6.3 ed 1 (Monday, 11 September)
Re: [Comment on ITS WD] Invert translate examples (Monday, 11 September)
Re: [Comment on ITS WD] Default translate value (Monday, 11 September)
Re: [Comment on ITS WD] Inheritance of translation information (Monday, 11 September)
Re: [Comment on ITS WD] Translatability (Monday, 11 September)
Re: [Comment on ITS WD] Use of xml:lang (Monday, 11 September)
Re: [Comment on ITS WD] Example 33 (Monday, 11 September)
Re: [Comment on ITS WD] RFC 3066bis (Monday, 11 September)
Re: [Comment on ITS WD] Language information dc overview (Monday, 11 September)

Karl Dubost

Conformance to Unicode 5.0: Troubles on the horizon? (Monday, 4 September)

Martin Duerst

Re: Conformance to Unicode 5.0: Troubles on the horizon? (Monday, 4 September)
Re: Conformance to Unicode 5.0: Troubles on the horizon? (Monday, 4 September)

Najib Tounsi

Re: [Comment on ITS WD] Avoid xml:lang='he' (Friday, 15 September)

Richard Ishida

RE: [Comment on ITS WD] xml:lang = language info, please (Tuesday, 26 September)
RE: [Comment on ITS WD] Translatability (Tuesday, 26 September)
RE: [Comment on ITS WD] Translatability (Friday, 22 September)
RE: [Comment on ITS WD] Richard's editorial comments on ITS (Wednesday, 20 September)
RE: [Comment on ITS WD] Avoid xml:lang='he' (Wednesday, 20 September)
RE: [Comment on ITS WD] Avoid xml:lang='he' (Thursday, 14 September)
RE: [Comment on ITS WD] Avoid xml:lang='he' (Thursday, 14 September)
RE: [Comment on ITS WD] Avoid xml:lang='he' (Thursday, 14 September)
RE: [Comment on ITS WD] Too many places to look (Wednesday, 13 September)
RE: [Comment on ITS WD] Missing document reference (Wednesday, 13 September)
I18n Comments (Wednesday, 13 September)
RE: [Comment on ITS WD] Translatability (Wednesday, 13 September)
RE: [Comment on ITS WD] xml:lang = language info, please (Monday, 11 September)
RE: [Comment on ITS WD] Make the application of legacy ruby clearer (Monday, 11 September)
RE: [Comment on ITS WD] Avoid xml:lang='he' (Monday, 11 September)
RE: [Comment on ITS WD] Use of xml:lang (Monday, 11 September)
RE: [Comment on ITS WD] Example 33 (Monday, 11 September)
RE: [Comment on ITS WD] RFC 3066bis (Monday, 11 September)
RE: [Comment on ITS WD] Invert translate examples (Monday, 11 September)

Yves Savourel

RE: [Comment on ITS WD] xml:lang = language info, please (Thursday, 21 September)
RE: [Comment on ITS WD] Translatability (Wednesday, 20 September)
RE: [Comment on ITS WD] Avoid xml:lang='he' (Sunday, 17 September)
RE: [Comment on ITS WD] Avoid xml:lang='he' (Friday, 15 September)
RE: [Comment on ITS WD] Avoid xml:lang='he' (Thursday, 14 September)
RE: [Comment on ITS WD] Avoid xml:lang='he' (Thursday, 14 September)
RE: [Comment on ITS WD] Example 33 (Tuesday, 12 September)
RE: [Comment on ITS WD] Use of xml:lang (Tuesday, 12 September)
RE: [Comment on ITS WD] RFC 3066bis (Tuesday, 12 September)
RE: [Comment on ITS WD] Invert translate examples (Monday, 11 September)
RE: [Comment on ITS WD] Make the application of legacy ruby clearer (Monday, 11 September)
RE: [Comment on ITS WD] Invert translate examples (Monday, 11 September)
Re: [Comment on ITS WD] Too many places to look (Monday, 11 September)
Re: [Comment on ITS WD] Missing document reference (Monday, 11 September)
Re: [Comment on ITS WD] Mary's editorial comments on ITS (Monday, 11 September)
Re: [Comment on ITS WD] Richard's editorial comments on ITS (Monday, 11 September)

Last message date: Thursday, 28 September 2006 12:09:51 UTC