- From: Yves Savourel <ysavourel@translate.com>
- Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2006 09:36:46 -0600
- To: "'Richard Ishida'" <ishida@w3.org>, "'Felix Sasaki'" <fsasaki@w3.org>
- Cc: <www-i18n-comments@w3.org>, <public-i18n-core@w3.org>, <public-i18n-its@w3.org>
Hi Richard, The reference has been changed to 'RFC3066 or its successor' with a link to a reference to the "Language Identification" section of the XML specification. See http://www.w3.org/International/its/itstagset/itstagset.html#langinfo-definition Please let us know within 2 weeks if you are satisfied. If we don't hear from you , we will assume this issue as closed. Cheers, -yves -----Original Message----- From: public-i18n-its-request@w3.org [mailto:public-i18n-its-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Richard Ishida Sent: Monday, September 11, 2006 1:09 PM To: 'Felix Sasaki' Cc: www-i18n-comments@w3.org; public-i18n-core@w3.org; public-i18n-its@w3.org Subject: RE: [Comment on ITS WD] xml:lang = language info, please Personal comment: "Applying the language information data category to xml:lang attributes using global rules is not necessary, since xml:lang is already defined in terms of [RFC 4646]." Strictly speaking xml is defined in terms of RFC 3066 or its successor. It may be better to say "in terms of [BCP 47]" at this location. If not, you should add, or it's successor. (Bear in mind that RFC 4646bis is just around the corner, relatively speaking.) RI
Received on Thursday, 21 September 2006 15:37:05 UTC