Re: [Comment on ITS WD] RFC 3066bis

Hello i18n core,

This is a reply on behalf of the i18n ITS working group. See also
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=3457 for our discussion .

Thank you very much for your comment. We agreed to implement it like the
reference at
http://www.w3.org/International/its/itstagset/itstagset.html#langinfo-implementation
.

Please let us know within 2 weeks if you are satisfied. If we don't hear
 from you , we will assume this issue as closed.

Regards,

Felix
ishida@w3.org wrote:
> Comment from the i18n review of:
> http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/WD-its-20060518/
> 
> Comment 2
> At http://www.w3.org/International/reviews/0606-its/
> Editorial/substantive: S
> Owner: RI
> 
> Location in reviewed document:
> 6.7.1
> 
> Comment: 
> We recommend that you say, BCP 47 instead of RFC 3066bis.
> 
> 
> We also strongly recommend that you add the phrase "or its successor" after reference to RFC 3066bis or BCP 47, since RFC3066bis is expected to become obsolete soon after it is released (to make way for RFC 3066ter).
> 
> 
> 
>

Received on Monday, 11 September 2006 00:43:44 UTC