Re: [Comment on ITS WD] Example 19 xml:lang

Hello i18n core,

This is a reply on behalf of the i18n ITS working group. See also
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=3469 for our discussion.

Thank you very much for your comment. We agreed to implement it. Please
have a look at
http://www.w3.org/International/its/itstagset/itstagset.html#langinfo-implementation
 , especially the note after example 38.



Please let us know within 2 weeks if you are satisfied. If we don't hear
 from you , we will assume this issue as closed.

Regards,

Felix


ishida@w3.org wrote:
> Comment from the i18n review of:
> http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/WD-its-20060518/
> 
> Comment 46
> At http://www.w3.org/International/reviews/0606-its/
> Editorial/substantive: S/E
> Owner: RI
> 
> Location in reviewed document:
> 5.6
> 
> Comment: 
> Should this be identified by global rules as language information? If not, we should explain why in the language information data category section.
> 
> 
> FS: The current definition 6.7.1. says "The element langRule is used to express that a given piece of content(selected by the attribute langPointer) is used to express language information as defined by [RFC 3066bis]." I would add a note saying 
> 
> 
> "Applying this data category to xml:lang attributes does not make sense since xml:lang is already defined interms of RFC 3066 or its successor". If that would address your concern, please add it to your comment.
> 
> 
> I18n: We propose a slight alteration to the above:
> 
> 
> Applying the langRule data category to xml:lang attributes using global rules is not necessary, since ...
> 
> 
> 
>

Received on Monday, 11 September 2006 03:53:52 UTC