W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-i18n-comments@w3.org > September 2006

Re: [Comment on ITS WD] Marks terms and meanings

From: Felix Sasaki <fsasaki@w3.org>
Date: Mon, 11 Sep 2006 11:23:25 +0900
Message-ID: <4504C89D.4040502@w3.org>
To: ishida@w3.org
Cc: www-i18n-comments@w3.org, public-i18n-core@w3.org, public-i18n-its@w3.org

Hello i18n core,

This is a reply on behalf of the i18n ITS working group. See also
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=3493 for our discussion.

Thank you very much for your comment. We agreed to implement it. Please
have a look at

Please let us know within 2 weeks if you are satisfied. If we don't hear
 from you , we will assume this issue as closed.



ishida@w3.org wrote:
> Comment from the i18n review of:
> http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/WD-its-20060518/
> Comment 17
> At http://www.w3.org/International/reviews/0606-its/
> Editorial/substantive: E
> Owner: RI
> Location in reviewed document:
> 6.4.1
> Comment: 
> "The terminology data category is used to mark terms."
> Surely, as a definition, this must say 'The terminology data category is used to mark terms and associate them with definitions'?
> FS: You will see at http://www.w3.org/TR/its/#terminology-markup that you can use the terminology data category for just identifying terms. All attributes for adding further information (e.g., but *not only* about definitions) are optional.
> I18n: Then let's reword the proposed text to Surely, as a definition, this must say 'The terminology data category is used to mark terms and optionally associate them with information, such as definitions'?
> (We have reduced this comment to editorial.)
Received on Monday, 11 September 2006 02:23:42 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 22:40:01 UTC