www-archive@w3.org from April 2011 by thread

Re: Working Group Decision on ISSUE-131 caret-location-api Jonas Sicking (Friday, 29 April)

[wbs] response to 'HTML5 license: Which license should be used for the W3C HTML5 specifications? - Preference Poll' WBS Mailer on behalf of erights@google.com (Friday, 29 April)

Re: Bug 11239 Jonas Sicking (Thursday, 28 April)

[wbs] response to 'Grant II: Grant of License for Contributed Test Cases Published Outside a W3C Recommendation' WBS Mailer on behalf of alan@css-class.com (Wednesday, 27 April)

Re: Longdesc - broader UA implementation (was: longdesc) Leif Halvard Silli (Tuesday, 26 April)

Re: {agenda} HTML WG telecon 2011-04-21: New Issue, ISSUE-152, Decisions, Issue Status, Plans Steve Faulkner (Wednesday, 20 April)

re: issue turrets (sic) Steve Faulkner (Wednesday, 20 April)

Re: clarifications to issue 31 title as conforming when alt is omitted Jonas Sicking (Tuesday, 19 April)

youtube i18n Danny Ayers (Saturday, 16 April)

Re: Working Group Decision on ISSUE-155 table-border Leif Halvard Silli (Saturday, 16 April)

removed edited@w3.org (Thursday, 14 April)

Re: Comments on SVG Compositing Ian Hickson (Thursday, 14 April)

Re: Mozilla Proposal for HTML5 Spec Licence Ian Hickson (Wednesday, 13 April)

Fwd: Re: RDFa and the OpenGraph Protocol James Graham (Tuesday, 12 April)

RE: Systematic access to media/plugin metadata Henri Sivonen (Tuesday, 12 April)

Re: Working Group Decision on ISSUE-120 rdfa-prefixes Julian Reschke (Friday, 8 April)

Suggestions for HTML-WG decision summary Karl Dubost (Tuesday, 5 April)

Re: Objection to HTMLWG ISSUE-144 Change Proposal #2 (keep u non-conforming) Leif Halvard Silli (Tuesday, 5 April)

Objections to no-change proposal, ISSUE-155 Leif Halvard Silli (Tuesday, 5 April)

ISSUE-27 poll feedback^2 Julian Reschke (Monday, 4 April)

[wbs] response to 'ISSUE-144: Make "u" element conforming - Straw Poll for Objections' WBS Mailer on behalf of kennyluck@w3.org (Sunday, 3 April)

[wbs] response to 'ISSUE-144: Make "u" element conforming - Straw Poll for Objections' WBS Mailer on behalf of kennyluck@w3.org (Sunday, 3 April)

[wbs] response to 'ISSUE-144: Make "u" element conforming - Straw Poll for Objections' WBS Mailer on behalf of kennyluck@w3.org (Sunday, 3 April)

[wbs] response to 'ISSUE-144: Make "u" element conforming - Straw Poll for Objections' WBS Mailer on behalf of kennyluck@w3.org (Sunday, 3 April)

[wbs] response to 'ISSUE-144: Make "u" element conforming - Straw Poll for Objections' WBS Mailer on behalf of kennyluck@w3.org (Sunday, 3 April)

Re: Objection to HTMLWG ISSUE-144 Change Proposal #2 (keep u non-conforming) Leif Halvard Silli (Saturday, 2 April)

[wbs] response to 'ISSUE-155: Make border attribute conforming on table element - Straw Poll for Objections' WBS Mailer on behalf of xn--mlform-iua@xn--mlform-iua.no (Saturday, 2 April)

[wbs] response to 'ISSUE-155: Make border attribute conforming on table element - Straw Poll for Objections' WBS Mailer on behalf of xn--mlform-iua@xn--mlform-iua.no (Saturday, 2 April)

[wbs] response to 'ISSUE-27: @rel value ownership, registry consideration - Straw Poll for Objections' WBS Mailer on behalf of tantek@cs.stanford.edu (Saturday, 2 April)

Objection to HTMLWG ISSUE-144 Change Proposal #2 (keep u non-conforming) Aryeh Gregor (Friday, 1 April)

[Fwd: Re: PUT and DELETE methods in 200 code] Nathan (Friday, 1 April)

Re: Working Group Decision on 142 poster-alt Sam Ruby (Friday, 1 April)

Last message date: Saturday, 30 April 2011 18:30:13 UTC