- From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Date: Fri, 08 Apr 2011 19:03:31 +0200
- To: David Carlisle <davidc@nag.co.uk>
- CC: www-archive <www-archive@w3.org>
Taking this offlist as the chairs apparently don't want further discussion... On 08.04.2011 18:43, David Carlisle wrote: > ... > The syntax rules for HTML (might be) a bit more flexible so perhaps > there would be more flexibility in an html context (but perhaps not, > real life constrains html design perhaps more than SGML heritage > constrains XML design, as you know). So while it may be true that the > original motivation for prefixes doesn't apply to html, that wouldn't be > related to machine generated content. > ... The context was RDFa-in-HTML, which uses QNames^h^h^h^h^h^hCURIEs in attribute values, so compatibility with the HTML name syntax wouldn't be an issue. Best regards, Julian
Received on Friday, 8 April 2011 17:04:08 UTC