www-archive@w3.org from April 2011 by date

Saturday, 30 April 2011

Re: Working Group Decision on ISSUE-131 caret-location-api Ian Hickson
Re: Bug 11239 Ian Hickson

Friday, 29 April 2011

Re: Working Group Decision on ISSUE-131 caret-location-api Jonas Sicking
Re: Working Group Decision on ISSUE-131 caret-location-api Richard Schwerdtfeger
Re: Working Group Decision on ISSUE-131 caret-location-api Jonas Sicking
Re: Working Group Decision on ISSUE-131 caret-location-api Richard Schwerdtfeger
Re: Working Group Decision on ISSUE-131 caret-location-api Jonas Sicking
Re: Working Group Decision on ISSUE-131 caret-location-api Richard Schwerdtfeger
Re: Working Group Decision on ISSUE-131 caret-location-api Jonas Sicking
[wbs] response to 'HTML5 license: Which license should be used for the W3C HTML5 specifications? - Preference Poll' WBS Mailer on behalf of erights@google.com

Thursday, 28 April 2011

Re: Bug 11239 Jonas Sicking

Wednesday, 27 April 2011

[wbs] response to 'Grant II: Grant of License for Contributed Test Cases Published Outside a W3C Recommendation' WBS Mailer on behalf of alan@css-class.com

Tuesday, 26 April 2011

Re: Longdesc - broader UA implementation (was: longdesc) Leif Halvard Silli

Wednesday, 20 April 2011

Re: {agenda} HTML WG telecon 2011-04-21: New Issue, ISSUE-152, Decisions, Issue Status, Plans Sam Ruby
Re: {agenda} HTML WG telecon 2011-04-21: New Issue, ISSUE-152, Decisions, Issue Status, Plans Steve Faulkner
Re: {agenda} HTML WG telecon 2011-04-21: New Issue, ISSUE-152, Decisions, Issue Status, Plans Sam Ruby
Re: {agenda} HTML WG telecon 2011-04-21: New Issue, ISSUE-152, Decisions, Issue Status, Plans Steve Faulkner
re: issue turrets (sic) Steve Faulkner

Tuesday, 19 April 2011

Re: clarifications to issue 31 title as conforming when alt is omitted Jonas Sicking
Re: clarifications to issue 31 title as conforming when alt is omitted Steve Faulkner
Re: clarifications to issue 31 title as conforming when alt is omitted Jonas Sicking

Saturday, 16 April 2011

youtube i18n Danny Ayers
Re: Working Group Decision on ISSUE-155 table-border Leif Halvard Silli
Re: Working Group Decision on ISSUE-155 table-border Tab Atkins Jr.
Re: Working Group Decision on ISSUE-155 table-border Leif Halvard Silli

Friday, 15 April 2011

Re: CSS, certain "presentational" attributes and HTML5 Aryeh Gregor
Re: Mozilla Proposal for HTML5 Spec Licence Danny Ayers

Thursday, 14 April 2011

Re: Mozilla Proposal for HTML5 Spec Licence Ian Hickson
Re: Mozilla Proposal for HTML5 Spec Licence Danny Ayers
removed edited@w3.org
Re: Mozilla Proposal for HTML5 Spec Licence Steve Faulkner
Re: Comments on SVG Compositing Ian Hickson

Wednesday, 13 April 2011

Re: Mozilla Proposal for HTML5 Spec Licence Ian Hickson
Re: Mozilla Proposal for HTML5 Spec Licence Ian Hickson
Re: Mozilla Proposal for HTML5 Spec Licence Nathan
Re: Mozilla Proposal for HTML5 Spec Licence Sam Ruby
Re: Mozilla Proposal for HTML5 Spec Licence Ian Hickson
Re: Mozilla Proposal for HTML5 Spec Licence Sam Ruby
Re: Mozilla Proposal for HTML5 Spec Licence Ian Hickson

Tuesday, 12 April 2011

Re: Working Group Decision on ISSUE-120 rdfa-prefixes Danny Ayers
Fwd: Re: RDFa and the OpenGraph Protocol James Graham
Re: Working Group Decision on ISSUE-120 rdfa-prefixes Henri Sivonen
RE: Systematic access to media/plugin metadata Henri Sivonen

Monday, 11 April 2011

Re: Working Group Decision on ISSUE-120 rdfa-prefixes Danny Ayers
Re: Working Group Decision on ISSUE-120 rdfa-prefixes Henri Sivonen

Saturday, 9 April 2011

CSS, certain "presentational" attributes and HTML5 Leif Halvard Silli

Friday, 8 April 2011

Re: Working Group Decision on ISSUE-120 rdfa-prefixes Julian Reschke

Thursday, 7 April 2011

Re: Objection to HTMLWG ISSUE-144 Change Proposal #2 (keep u non-conforming) Leif Halvard Silli

Wednesday, 6 April 2011

Re: Objection to HTMLWG ISSUE-144 Change Proposal #2 (keep u non-conforming) Leif Halvard Silli
Re: Objection to HTMLWG ISSUE-144 Change Proposal #2 (keep u non-conforming) Leif Halvard Silli
Re: Objection to HTMLWG ISSUE-144 Change Proposal #2 (keep u non-conforming) Leif Halvard Silli
Re: Objection to HTMLWG ISSUE-144 Change Proposal #2 (keep u non-conforming) Karl Dubost
Re: Objection to HTMLWG ISSUE-144 Change Proposal #2 (keep u non-conforming) Leif Halvard Silli
Re: Objection to HTMLWG ISSUE-144 Change Proposal #2 (keep u non-conforming) Karl Dubost
Re: Objection to HTMLWG ISSUE-144 Change Proposal #2 (keep u non-conforming) Leif Halvard Silli

Tuesday, 5 April 2011

Re: Suggestions for HTML-WG decision summary Sam Ruby
Suggestions for HTML-WG decision summary Karl Dubost
Re: Objection to HTMLWG ISSUE-144 Change Proposal #2 (keep u non-conforming) Leif Halvard Silli
Re: Objection to HTMLWG ISSUE-144 Change Proposal #2 (keep u non-conforming) Leif Halvard Silli
Objections to no-change proposal, ISSUE-155 Leif Halvard Silli

Monday, 4 April 2011

Re: Objection to HTMLWG ISSUE-144 Change Proposal #2 (keep u non-conforming) Aryeh Gregor
ISSUE-27 poll feedback^2 Julian Reschke
Re: Objection to HTMLWG ISSUE-144 Change Proposal #2 (keep u non-conforming) Laura Carlson
Re: Objection to HTMLWG ISSUE-144 Change Proposal #2 (keep u non-conforming) Ian Hickson

Sunday, 3 April 2011

[wbs] response to 'ISSUE-144: Make "u" element conforming - Straw Poll for Objections' WBS Mailer on behalf of kennyluck@w3.org
[wbs] response to 'ISSUE-144: Make "u" element conforming - Straw Poll for Objections' WBS Mailer on behalf of kennyluck@w3.org
[wbs] response to 'ISSUE-144: Make "u" element conforming - Straw Poll for Objections' WBS Mailer on behalf of kennyluck@w3.org
[wbs] response to 'ISSUE-144: Make "u" element conforming - Straw Poll for Objections' WBS Mailer on behalf of kennyluck@w3.org
[wbs] response to 'ISSUE-144: Make "u" element conforming - Straw Poll for Objections' WBS Mailer on behalf of kennyluck@w3.org
Re: Objection to HTMLWG ISSUE-144 Change Proposal #2 (keep u non-conforming) Leif Halvard Silli
Re: Objection to HTMLWG ISSUE-144 Change Proposal #2 (keep u non-conforming) Aryeh Gregor
RE: [Fwd: Re: PUT and DELETE methods in 200 code] Paul Cotton

Saturday, 2 April 2011

Re: [Fwd: Re: PUT and DELETE methods in 200 code] Nathan
Re: [Fwd: Re: PUT and DELETE methods in 200 code] Cameron Heavon-Jones
Re: [Fwd: Re: PUT and DELETE methods in 200 code] Cameron Heavon-Jones
Re: [Fwd: Re: PUT and DELETE methods in 200 code] Nathan
Re: [Fwd: Re: PUT and DELETE methods in 200 code] Cameron Heavon-Jones
Re: [Fwd: Re: PUT and DELETE methods in 200 code] Cameron Heavon-Jones
contenteditable and PUT - was Re: [Fwd: Re: PUT and DELETE methods in 200 code] Nathan
Re: [Fwd: Re: PUT and DELETE methods in 200 code] Nathan
Re: [Fwd: Re: PUT and DELETE methods in 200 code] Julian Reschke
Re: [Fwd: Re: PUT and DELETE methods in 200 code] Cameron Heavon-Jones
Re: [Fwd: Re: PUT and DELETE methods in 200 code] Cameron Heavon-Jones
Re: [Fwd: Re: PUT and DELETE methods in 200 code] Cameron Heavon-Jones
Re: [Fwd: Re: PUT and DELETE methods in 200 code] mike amundsen
Re: [Fwd: Re: PUT and DELETE methods in 200 code] mike amundsen
Re: [Fwd: Re: PUT and DELETE methods in 200 code] Danny Ayers
Re: [Fwd: Re: PUT and DELETE methods in 200 code] Julian Reschke
Re: [Fwd: Re: PUT and DELETE methods in 200 code] Arthur Clifford
Re: Objection to HTMLWG ISSUE-144 Change Proposal #2 (keep u non-conforming) Leif Halvard Silli
[wbs] response to 'ISSUE-155: Make border attribute conforming on table element - Straw Poll for Objections' WBS Mailer on behalf of xn--mlform-iua@xn--mlform-iua.no
[wbs] response to 'ISSUE-155: Make border attribute conforming on table element - Straw Poll for Objections' WBS Mailer on behalf of xn--mlform-iua@xn--mlform-iua.no
Re: [Fwd: Re: PUT and DELETE methods in 200 code] mike amundsen
[wbs] response to 'ISSUE-27: @rel value ownership, registry consideration - Straw Poll for Objections' WBS Mailer on behalf of tantek@cs.stanford.edu
Re: [Fwd: Re: PUT and DELETE methods in 200 code] Subbu Allamaraju
Re: [Fwd: Re: PUT and DELETE methods in 200 code] mike amundsen

Friday, 1 April 2011

Objection to HTMLWG ISSUE-144 Change Proposal #2 (keep u non-conforming) Aryeh Gregor
Re: [Fwd: Re: PUT and DELETE methods in 200 code] Sam Ruby
Re: [Fwd: Re: PUT and DELETE methods in 200 code] Julian Reschke
Re: [Fwd: Re: PUT and DELETE methods in 200 code] Sam Ruby
[Fwd: Re: PUT and DELETE methods in 200 code] Nathan
Re: Working Group Decision on 142 poster-alt Aryeh Gregor
Re: Working Group Decision on 142 poster-alt Sam Ruby

Last message date: Saturday, 30 April 2011 18:30:13 UTC