Re: Mozilla Proposal for HTML5 Spec Licence

On 14 April 2011 22:20, Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch> wrote:

> For developer-facing non-normative documentation, the WHATWG is likely to
> continue using the term "HTML5" for some time, but it really has nothing
> to do with the W3C draft.

I'm curious, and so hope you will answer a direct question - who gains
what from maintaining confusion through contradictory/ambiguous
naming?

Cheers,
Danny.

-- 
http://danny.ayers.name

Received on Thursday, 14 April 2011 21:46:45 UTC