w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org from May 2002 by date

Friday, 31 May 2002

• RE: Comments on the new RDF Test Cases draft Dan Connolly
• RE: Comments on the new RDF Test Cases draft patrick hayes
• Re: in and out of the MT Jos De_Roo
• Re: in and out of the MT Dave Beckett
• in and out of the MT patrick hayes
• Re: help wanted: RDF issue rdfms-assertion patrick hayes
• WG minutes for the Telecon 2002-05-31 - CORRECTION Graham Klyne
• WG minutes for the Telecon 2002-05-31 Graham Klyne
• Fwd: Actions/Decisions from RDFCore WG Telecon 2002-05-31 Brian McBride
• Re: Dark triples are inherently nonmonotonic (from Pat Hayes & R.Guha) Graham Klyne
• Re: test cases needing review Jos De_Roo

Thursday, 30 May 2002

• Re: help wanted: RDF issue rdfms-assertion Tim Berners-Lee
• Dark triples are inherently nonmonotonic (from Pat Hayes & R.Guha) R.V.Guha
• Re: Layering OWL on RDF: the case for unasserted triples Jim Hendler
• Re: Layering OWL on RDF: the case for unasserted triples Jonathan Borden
• Re: Layering OWL on RDF: the case for unasserted triples Brian McBride
• Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2002-05-31 bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com
• Re: Layering OWL on RDF: the case for unasserted triples Jonathan Borden
• Re: testcase for the option for collections Brian McBride
• Re: help wanted: RDF issue rdfms-assertion Tim Berners-Lee
• Re: Layering OWL on RDF: the case for unasserted triples Brian McBride
• Layering OWL on RDF: the case for unasserted triples Jonathan Borden
• Re: test cases needing review Graham Klyne
• Re: testcase for the option for collections Jos De_Roo
• Re: testcase for the option for collections Brian McBride
• Re: test cases needing review Jan Grant
• Re: RDF Graph questions Patrick Stickler
• Re: RDF Graph questions Graham Klyne
• Re: RDF Graph questions Patrick Stickler
• Re: testcase for the option for collections Jos De_Roo
• Re: RDF Graph questions Patrick Stickler

Wednesday, 29 May 2002

• Re: help wanted: RDF issue rdfms-assertion Lynn Andrea Stein
• Re: help wanted: RDF issue rdfms-assertion Graham Klyne
• Re: RDF Graph questions Graham Klyne
• Re: help wanted: RDF issue rdfms-assertion patrick hayes
• Re: testcase for the option for collections Dan Connolly
• Re: help wanted: RDF issue rdfms-assertion Tim Berners-Lee
• Re: RDF Graph questions patrick hayes
• Re: help wanted: RDF issue rdfms-assertion Lynn Andrea Stein
• Re: test cases needing review Dave Beckett
• Re: help wanted: RDF issue rdfms-assertion Tim Berners-Lee
• Re: test cases needing review Aaron Swartz
• test cases needing review Brian McBride
• weekly call for agenda items Brian McBride
• Re: RDF Graph questions Brian McBride

Thursday, 30 May 2002

• Looking For A Crisis Proof Investment? Financial Service Group

Wednesday, 29 May 2002

• RDF Graph (new version) Jeremy Carroll
• Re: June f2f Patrick Stickler
• Re: RDF Graph questions Dan Brickley

Tuesday, 28 May 2002

• Re: RDF Graph questions patrick hayes
• Re: RDF Graph questions patrick hayes
• Re: June f2f patrick hayes
• Re: June f2f Patrick Stickler
• RE: xml:lang [was Re: Outstanding Issues ] Martin Duerst

Monday, 27 May 2002

• Re: June f2f Brian McBride
• Re: June f2f Brian McBride
• RE: Charmod review Jeremy Carroll
• Telecon draft minutes 2002-05-24 Jan Grant
• Re: June f2f Patrick Stickler
• Re: June f2f Patrick Stickler

Friday, 24 May 2002

• Re: shorter Primer Frank Manola
• Re: shorter Primer Aaron Swartz
• shorter Primer Frank Manola
• testcase for the option for collections Jos De_Roo
• refining closure text for rdfs-isDefinedBy-semantics Dan Brickley
• Re: another charmod comment Graham Klyne
• another charmod comment Jeremy Carroll
• RE: RDF Graph questions Dan Brickley
• RE: RDF Graph questions Jeremy Carroll
• Re: Bad job on literals? Jos De_Roo
• Re: RDF Graph questions Frank Manola
• Re: Bad job on literals? Sergey Melnik
• Re: RDF Graph questions Dave Beckett
• Re: RDF Graph questions Brian McBride
• Re: RDF Graph questions Dan Brickley
• Re: RDF Graph questions Dave Beckett
• Re: RDF Graph questions Dan Brickley
• RDF Graph questions Jeremy Carroll
• Leaving the group Martyn Horner

Thursday, 23 May 2002

• Re: Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2002-05-24 Dan Connolly
• Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2002-05-24 bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com
• RE: Bad job on literals? Jeremy Carroll
• document schedules Brian McBride
• Re: Weekly call for agenda items Patrick Stickler
• RE: Weekly call for agenda items Jeremy Carroll
• Re: Weekly call for agenda items Patrick Stickler
• RE: Charmod review Jeremy Carroll

Wednesday, 22 May 2002

• Re: [ij@w3.org: Proposed TAG Finding: Internet Media Type registration, consistency of use] (fwd) patrick hayes
• TAG considers issue rdfms-qname-uri-mapping Brian McBride
• Weekly call for agenda items Brian McBride
• RE: Bad job on literals? Jeremy Carroll
• Re: Bad job on literals? by way of
• Re: [ij@w3.org: Proposed TAG Finding: Internet Media Type registration, consistency of use] (fwd) Graham Klyne
• Re: [ij@w3.org: Proposed TAG Finding: Internet Media Type registration, consistency of use] (fwd) Dan Connolly
• [ij@w3.org: Proposed TAG Finding: Internet Media Type registration, consistency of use] (fwd) Dan Brickley

Tuesday, 21 May 2002

• Bad job on literals? Sergey Melnik
• RE: Dublin Core, the Primer and the Model Theory Graham Klyne

Monday, 20 May 2002

• clarifying status of action on rdf:value for Primer update Frank Manola
• (Draft) Minutes of Telecon 20020517 Brian McBride

Sunday, 19 May 2002

• Re: Dublin Core, the Primer and the Model Theory patrick hayes

Friday, 17 May 2002

• Re: Dublin Core, the Primer and the Model Theory Aaron Swartz
• some telecon scribing Jos De_Roo
• Re: June f2f Frank Manola
• RE: Dublin Core, the Primer and the Model Theory Jeremy Carroll
• RE: Dublin Core, the Primer and the Model Theory Dan Connolly
• RE: Charmod review Jeremy Carroll
• xml:base feedback from URI mail list Brian McBride
• Regrets telecon 17 May 2002 Graham Klyne
• Re: Charmod review Dave Beckett
• RE: Dublin Core, the Primer and the Model Theory Jeremy Carroll
• Re: Dublin Core, the Primer and the Model Theory Graham Klyne

Thursday, 16 May 2002

• Re: Dublin Core, the Primer and the Model Theory Jos De_Roo
• Re: Dublin Core, the Primer and the Model Theory Graham Klyne
• Re: Dublin Core, the Primer and the Model Theory Patrick Stickler
• Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2002-05-17 bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com
• Re: Dublin Core, the Primer and the Model Theory Dan Connolly
• Re: Dublin Core, the Primer and the Model Theory Graham Klyne
• Re: Dublin Core, the Primer and the Model Theory Graham Klyne
• RE: Dublin Core, the Primer and the Model Theory Jeremy Carroll
• Re: Dublin Core, the Primer and the Model Theory Patrick Stickler
• Re: Dublin Core, the Primer and the Model Theory Patrick Stickler
• Re: Dublin Core, the Primer and the Model Theory Patrick Stickler
• Re: Dublin Core, the Primer and the Model Theory Dan Connolly
• Re: RDF Primer coverage from XML.com Frank Manola
• Re: Dublin Core, the Primer and the Model Theory Frank Manola
• Re: Dublin Core, the Primer and the Model Theory Graham Klyne
• Dublin Core, the Primer and the Model Theory Jeremy Carroll
• re: RDF Core working drafts Graham Klyne
• RDF Primer coverage from XML.com Dave Beckett

Tuesday, 14 May 2002

• Charmod review Jeremy Carroll
• Regrets, telecon 2002-05-17 Jan Grant

Sunday, 12 May 2002

• RDFers through the ages pics from WWW2002 Dave Beckett

Wednesday, 8 May 2002

• June f2f Brian McBride
• Test cases now have N-Triples: rdfms-literal-is-xml-structure Jan Grant
• ACTION 2002-05-03#10 (jang) rdfms-duplicate-member-props Jan Grant

Tuesday, 7 May 2002

• Re: Telecon draft minutes: 2002-05-03 Brian McBride
• Re: Telecon draft minutes: 2002-05-03 Dan Brickley
• Re: Telecon draft minutes: 2002-05-03 Patrick Stickler

Friday, 3 May 2002

• Telecon draft minutes: 2002-05-03 Jan Grant

Thursday, 2 May 2002

• Re: Minutes for RDFCore WG Telecon 2002-04-26 Graham Klyne

Friday, 3 May 2002

• Apologies for 2002-05-03 telecon Graham Klyne
• Fwd: Actions/Decisions from RDFCore WG Telecon 2002-05-03 Brian McBride
• XML namespaces Jeremy Carroll
• Regrets for 2002-05-03 RDF-Core telcon Dave Beckett
• Regrets for tomorrow Aaron Swartz
• Re: Specific questions regarding rdfs:Literal, possible closure... Patrick Stickler

Thursday, 2 May 2002

• Re: Specific questions regarding rdfs:Literal, possible closure... patrick hayes
• Regrets Sergey Melnik
• Re: daml:collection Dan Connolly
• RE: addressing requirements around daml:collection (rdfms-seq-representation) Dan Connolly
• Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2002-05-03 bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com
• new issue #rdfms-duplicate-member-props Brian McBride
• RE: charmod-uri draft message Dan Connolly
• RE: charmod-uri draft message Jeremy Carroll

Thursday, 1 January 1970

• Re: user-defined datatype (facet) support needed? Pat Hayes

Thursday, 2 May 2002

• Re: user-defined datatype (facet) support needed? Dan Connolly
• Re: Minutes for RDFCore WG Telecon 2002-04-26 Brian McBride
• charmod-uri draft message Jeremy Carroll
• Re: Clarification of charmod-uri Graham Klyne
• Re: The place of rdfs:Literal's in the world... Patrick Stickler
• Re: The place of rdfs:Literal's in the world... Patrick Stickler
• Re: user-defined datatype (facet) support needed? Patrick Stickler

Wednesday, 1 May 2002

• Re: Clarification of charmod-uri Dan Connolly
• RE: comments on syntax wd: bug in graph seriali[zs]ation algo Jeremy Carroll
• RE: Clarification of charmod-uri Jeremy Carroll
• RE: Clarification of charmod-uri Jeremy Carroll
• Re: Schema comments Graham Klyne

Last message date: Friday, 31 May 2002 17:33:15 UTC