- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: 17 May 2002 08:52:54 -0500
- To: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Cc: Graham Klyne <Graham.Klyne@MIMEsweeper.com>, w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org
On Fri, 2002-05-17 at 04:57, Jeremy Carroll wrote: [...] > It is clear that > > <eg:doc1.html> <dc:creator> "John Smith" . > > is a less precise model than > > <eg:doc1.html> <dc:creator> _:x . > _:x <eg:name> "John Smith" . > > What is not clear is that the more precise model is a *better* model. I spent most of yesterday afternoon thinking this over and chatting with a few folks. I'm convinced it is a better model. I'm no longer interested in re-opening the issues. > I see simpledatatype2 as given a formal and precise account of how the overloading in DC works I see it as a horrible kludge/mess. I thought I could see a way to implement it, but it didn't stand up under scruitiny. As much as convincing DC folks to go back and separate creatorName from creator looks like pushing water up hill, I prefer that to kludging the RDF core treatment of literals. -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
Received on Friday, 17 May 2002 09:53:02 UTC