- From: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Date: Fri, 24 May 2002 10:39:04 +0100
- To: <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <JAEBJCLMIFLKLOJGMELDMEAHCEAA.jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
First, a heads up on my action to write a section defining the RDF graph. It's progressing, attached (with the usual red and green), still unfinished, and what is done is quite rough (no consistency in term use, or capitalization etc. I still need to do my own checking on readability etc.). Second a few questions. 1. Are there unattached nodes in an RDF graph? 2. Can any URI ref be a property name or must there be some associated namespace? 3. For XML literals should I - specify that they must be well-balanced XML - explicitly permit any unicode string (but only constrain equality for well-balanced XML) - have deliberate vagueness (e.g. talk about a unicode string, and then only define equality on well-balanced XML and ignore the issue of whether other strings are permitted or not). Test cases for 1 & 2. 1: Is this RDF/XML document <rdf:RDF><rdf:Description/></rdf:RDF> equivalent to or different from this one: <rdf:RDF/> and/or this one: <rdf:RDF> <rdf:Description rdf:about="http://example.org/"/> </rdf:RDF> (the question can't be asked in N-triple) 2: http://www.w3.org/2000/10/rdf-tests/rdfcore/rdfms-uri-substructure/error 001.nt whose status is pending Is this: a) an error because there is no such RDF graph or b) an example of alegal RDF graph that cannot be serialized as RDF/XML Reading http://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/#rdfms-uri-substructure and our resolution is not helpful. Jeremy
Attachments
- text/html attachment: RDF-XML_Syntax_Specification__Revised_.htm
- application/x-zip-compressed attachment: RDF-XML_Syntax_Specification__Revised__files.zip
Received on Friday, 24 May 2002 05:39:49 UTC