- From: Dave Beckett <dave.beckett@bristol.ac.uk>
- Date: Wed, 29 May 2002 18:24:16 +0100
- To: Aaron Swartz <me@aaronsw.com>
- cc: RDF Core <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
>>>Aaron Swartz said: > On Wednesday, May 29, 2002, at 11:55 AM, Brian McBride wrote: > > > pick you favourite unreviewed tests and volunteer to review them, > > preferably by Friday. > > I have reviewed rdfms-xmllang/test001-test005 and believe they are > correct. However I am unsure about test006 -- I'd have to do some more > careful spec reading to be sure. The W3C Validator (ARP) and CARA > disagree, although the former may simply have not been updated to > support language codes. Jeremy has noted a couple of times that the validator needs updating to match more recent RDF Core decisions. > DaveB, could you make two more test cases like test006, but with > parseType-and-xml:lang and just parseType? I think these would be useful. I'm not sure I understand what you mean. test005/test006 tests property attributes without/with xml:lang. parseType can't be used in that situation. test001 and test002 are the parseType without/with xml:lang for property elements. Dave
Received on Wednesday, 29 May 2002 13:24:54 UTC