- From: Graham Klyne <Graham.Klyne@MIMEsweeper.com>
- Date: Thu, 16 May 2002 12:09:27 +0100
- To: "Jeremy Carroll" <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Cc: <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
At 10:32 AM 5/16/02 +0100, Jeremy Carroll wrote: >I believe that the sheer quantity of these examples in the >primer indicates that this a substantial issue: that RDF, as >deployed, particularly in Dublin Core, does not conform with >the model theoretic changes agreed on the 22nd of February [2]. With emphasis on "sheer quantity", I think this is a compelling argument, which is not limited to Dublin Core. (Though I do think that "does not conform" is a slight overstatement, I do think this indicates a real problem.) Similar issues arise in at least two other RDF vocabularies that I can think of - CC/PP device capabilities and user preferences: http://www.w3.org/TR/CCPP-struct-vocab/ - Photo labelling schema: http://www.w3.org/TR/photo-rdf/ (in particular, section 5.2) #g ------------------- Graham Klyne <GK@NineByNine.org>
Received on Thursday, 16 May 2002 06:59:47 UTC