Re: shorter Primer

On Friday, May 24, 2002, at 11:37 AM, Frank Manola wrote:

> Since people apparently want a shorter Primer, and we can simply refer
> to the MT, test cases, and so on to explain everything, I thought you'd
> like to review this newer version.  Of course, some people may find the
> explanations a bit sparse, to which I suppose we'd respond, "that's
> life"!

Really nice job on the new Primer, Frank. I think we all appreciate it. 
Just a few nits:

Section 6 seems redundant. Can we just cut it?

Similarly section 9 can probably go too.

All the best,
  - Aaron

Received on Friday, 24 May 2002 13:39:15 UTC