- From: Patrick Stickler <patrick.stickler@nokia.com>
- Date: Thu, 02 May 2002 10:38:10 +0300
- To: Patrick Stickler <patrick.stickler@nokia.com>, Pat Hayes <phayes@ai.uwf.edu>
- CC: RDF Core <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
On 2002-05-02 10:32, "ext Patrick Stickler" <patrick.stickler@nokia.com>
wrote:
>>> The latest Schema draft says:
>>>
>>> rdfs:Literal This represents the set of atomic values,
>> eg. textual strings.
>>> and
>>>
>>> rdfs:Literal
>>>
>>> rdfs:Literal represents the self-denoting nodes called the 'literals' in the
>>> RDF graph structure. Atomic values such as textual strings are examples of
>>> RDF literals.
>>
>> Oh dear. It shouldn't say things like that. (Rats, something else to
>> read and review. )
>
> OK, this may be the source of my misunderstanding.
Would it be reasonable to say something along the lines that, all
'things' that are denoted by literal nodes in the graph are members
of the class rdfs:Literal?
Patrick
--
Patrick Stickler Phone: +358 50 483 9453
Senior Research Scientist Fax: +358 7180 35409
Nokia Research Center Email: patrick.stickler@nokia.com
Received on Thursday, 2 May 2002 03:35:07 UTC