- From: Graham Klyne <Graham.Klyne@MIMEsweeper.com>
- Date: Thu, 30 May 2002 16:45:35 +0100
- To: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Cc: rdf Core <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>, Jan Grant <Jan.Grant@bristol.ac.uk>
At 05:55 PM 5/29/02 +0100, Brian McBride wrote: >Folks, > >We need to get some of the outstanding test cases reviewed. Please can >you take a look at > > http://www.w3.org/2000/10/rdf-tests/rdfcore/allTestCases.html OK, I've been through all the outstanding cases - my comments are below. I don't think that any are wrong, but I've raised comments in some cases. http://www.w3.org/2000/10/rdf-tests/rdfcore/rdfms-difference-between-ID-and-about/test2.rdf http://www.w3.org/2000/10/rdf-tests/rdfcore/rdfms-difference-between-ID-and-about/test2.nt -- I agree with the UTF-8 mapping ü --> %C3%BC -- Does agreement on this transform depend on current IRI debates (I've lost track)? If we are agreed to have all URIs in the graph use just URI-character-sequences then I think this is right. http://www.w3.org/2000/10/rdf-tests/rdfcore/rdfms-reification-required/test001.rdf http://www.w3.org/2000/10/rdf-tests/rdfcore/rdfms-reification-required/test001.nt -- Looks OK to me. http://www.w3.org/2000/10/rdf-tests/rdfcore/rdfms-uri-substructure/test001.rdf http://www.w3.org/2000/10/rdf-tests/rdfcore/rdfms-uri-substructure/test001.nt -- Looks OK to me, but I'm not sure what it's meant to demonstrate. http://www.w3.org/2000/10/rdf-tests/rdfcore/rdfms-xmllang/test001.rdf http://www.w3.org/2000/10/rdf-tests/rdfcore/rdfms-xmllang/test001.nt -- Did we agree xml"foo" as the form for XML literals in N-triples? If so, it looks OK to me. http://www.w3.org/2000/10/rdf-tests/rdfcore/rdfms-xmllang/test002.rdf http://www.w3.org/2000/10/rdf-tests/rdfcore/rdfms-xmllang/test002.nt -- ditto regarding xml"chat"-fr http://www.w3.org/2000/10/rdf-tests/rdfcore/rdfms-xmllang/test003.rdf http://www.w3.org/2000/10/rdf-tests/rdfcore/rdfms-xmllang/test003.nt -- Looks OK to me. http://www.w3.org/2000/10/rdf-tests/rdfcore/rdfms-xmllang/test004.rdf http://www.w3.org/2000/10/rdf-tests/rdfcore/rdfms-xmllang/test004.nt -- ditto regarding "chat"-fr http://www.w3.org/2000/10/rdf-tests/rdfcore/rdfms-xmllang/test005.rdf http://www.w3.org/2000/10/rdf-tests/rdfcore/rdfms-xmllang/test005.nt -- Looks OK to me. http://www.w3.org/2000/10/rdf-tests/rdfcore/rdfms-xmllang/test006.rdf http://www.w3.org/2000/10/rdf-tests/rdfcore/rdfms-xmllang/test006.nt -- Interesting case (i.e. good test case!): does xml:lang apply to attributes of the element to which it is applied? XML says yes, but that means that the language applies to multiple RDF properties specified as attributes. I think that's all OK. http://www.w3.org/2000/10/rdf-tests/rdfcore/rdfms-abouteach/error001.rdf -- I agree with this (rdf:aboutEach is now an error). Does the group? http://www.w3.org/2000/10/rdf-tests/rdfcore/rdfms-abouteach/error002.rdf -- ditto http://www.w3.org/2000/10/rdf-tests/rdfcore/rdfms-parseType/error001.rdf -- I agree with this. http://www.w3.org/2000/10/rdf-tests/rdfcore/rdfms-parseType/error002.rdf -- I agree with this. http://www.w3.org/2000/10/rdf-tests/rdfcore/rdfms-parseType/error003.rdf -- I agree with this. http://www.w3.org/2000/10/rdf-tests/rdfcore/rdfs-container-membership-superProperty/not1P.rdf http://www.w3.org/2000/10/rdf-tests/rdfcore/rdfs-container-membership-superProperty/not1C.rdf -- I agree with this. (It would help if the test file contained its URL) http://www.w3.org/2000/10/rdf-tests/rdfcore/rdfms-uri-substructure/error001.nt -- I agree with this. http://www.w3.org/2000/10/rdf-tests/rdfcore/rdfms-duplicate-member-props/test001.rdf http://www.w3.org/2000/10/rdf-tests/rdfcore/rdfms-duplicate-member-props/test001.nt -- Hmmm... I agree that it should be allowed as legal RDF, but is there a case for producing a warning is repeated rdf:_n properties are used? http://www.w3.org/2000/10/rdf-tests/rdfcore/rdfms-literal-is-xml-structure/test001.rdf http://www.w3.org/2000/10/rdf-tests/rdfcore/rdfms-literal-is-xml-structure/test001.nt -- I agree with this. http://www.w3.org/2000/10/rdf-tests/rdfcore/rdfms-literal-is-xml-structure/test002.rdf http://www.w3.org/2000/10/rdf-tests/rdfcore/rdfms-literal-is-xml-structure/test002.nt -- I agree with this. But don't these cases duplicate xmllang tests? Does it matter? http://www.w3.org/2000/10/rdf-tests/rdfcore/rdfms-literal-is-xml-structure/test003.rdf http://www.w3.org/2000/10/rdf-tests/rdfcore/rdfms-literal-is-xml-structure/test003.nt -- I agree with this. (I never noticed xml:space before!) (Should there be additional test cases with multiple consecutive whitespace and leading/trailing whitespace with and without the xml:space='preserve' attribute?) http://www.w3.org/2000/10/rdf-tests/rdfcore/rdfms-literal-is-xml-structure/test004.rdf http://www.w3.org/2000/10/rdf-tests/rdfcore/rdfms-literal-is-xml-structure/test004.nt -- I agree with this. http://www.w3.org/2000/10/rdf-tests/rdfcore/rdfms-literal-is-xml-structure/test005.rdf http://www.w3.org/2000/10/rdf-tests/rdfcore/rdfms-literal-is-xml-structure/test005.nt -- I agree with this. http://www.w3.org/2000/10/rdf-tests/rdfcore/xmlbase/error001.rdf -- I agree with this. http://www.w3.org/2000/10/rdf-tests/rdfcore/rdfs-domain-and-range/test003.rdf http://www.w3.org/2000/10/rdf-tests/rdfcore/rdfs-domain-and-range/test003.nt -- I agree with this, but can't see what it's supposed to be testing. Also there appears to be some filename confusion with the RDFS entailment tests. http://www.w3.org/2000/10/rdf-tests/rdfcore/rdfs-domain-and-range/test004.rdf http://www.w3.org/2000/10/rdf-tests/rdfcore/rdfs-domain-and-range/test004.nt -- I agree with this, and note there appears to be continuing filename confusion. http://www.w3.org/2000/10/rdf-tests/rdfcore/rdfs-domain-and-range/test001.nt http://www.w3.org/2000/10/rdf-tests/rdfcore/rdfs-domain-and-range/test002.nt http://www.w3.org/2000/10/rdf-tests/rdfcore/rdfs-domain-and-range/test003.nt http://www.w3.org/2000/10/rdf-tests/rdfcore/rdfs-domain-and-range/test004.nt -- I agree with this. http://www.w3.org/2000/10/rdf-tests/rdfcore/rdfs-subPropertyOf-semantics/test001.nt http://www.w3.org/2000/10/rdf-tests/rdfcore/rdfs-subPropertyOf-semantics/test002.nt -- I agree with this. #g ------------------- Graham Klyne <GK@NineByNine.org>
Received on Thursday, 30 May 2002 11:34:13 UTC