FTP URIs - time to document the way browsers really behave?
- RE: FTP URIs - time to document the way browsers really behave?
- Re: FTP URIs - time to document the way browsers really behave?
- Re: FTP URIs - time to document the way browsers really behave?
- RE: FTP URIs - time to document the way browsers really behave?
- RE: FTP URIs - time to document the way browsers really behave?
file: URI scheme
draft-fielding-uri-rfc2396bis-07
draft-hoffman-news-nntp-uri-01.txt
apologies to Frank Ellerman
1738 replacements, round two
- more 'file' suggestions for draft-hoffman-file-uri
- RE: more 'file' suggestions for draft-hoffman-file-uri
- Re: more 'file' suggestions for draft-hoffman-file-uri
- Re: more 'file' suggestions for draft-hoffman-file-uri
- RE: more 'file' suggestions for draft-hoffman-file-uri
Re: [AAA-WG]: Re: AAA URI draft
Fwd: "absolute URI reference" considered awkward
RE: proposed patch
Still an Off topic quicky question - but no reply needed to this thread, I am reading the current thread of request changes, etc.
Re: AAA URI draft
Re: [046-lc-edit-relative-URI] proposed patch
- draft-06 plus last-call changes
- Re: [046-lc-edit-relative-URI] proposed patch
- Re: [046-lc-edit-relative-URI] proposed patch
Re: Just a short quick question, relation to text of 1.1.3 in 2396bis
Re: draft-kindberg-tag-uri
non-authoritative syntaxes for fragment identifiers
- RE: non-authoritative syntaxes for fragment identifiers
- Re: non-authoritative syntaxes for fragment identifiers
- Re: non-authoritative syntaxes for fragment identifiers
Re: Comments on draft-saintandre-xmpp-uri-04.txt
Re: Just a short quick question, relation to text of 1.1.3 in 2396bis about URL ref? (re-posted; 2nd attempt)
Off/On topic - Brick VS Head. URI(URL/File) eg of previous posts...
RE: updating RFC 2718 (Guidelines for new URL schemes)
- RE: updating RFC 2718 (Guidelines for new URL schemes)
- RE: updating RFC 2718 (Guidelines for new URL schemes)
- RE: updating RFC 2718 (Guidelines for new URL schemes)