- From: Roy T. Fielding <fielding@gbiv.com>
- Date: Sat, 25 Sep 2004 03:01:29 -0700
- To: uri@w3.org
I have added a note similar to what Graham suggested to the
introduction of relative references:
<http://gbiv.com/protocols/uri/rev-2002/rfc2396bis.html#hierarchical>
and a table to the section on changes for mapping obsolete bnf
rules to their definitions:
<http://gbiv.com/protocols/uri/rev-2002/rfc2396bis.html#changes>
and a paragraph to the sections on scheme and absolute-URI to
indicate that scheme specifications must define a syntax that
is a subset of absolute-URI and thus don't have to redefine
fragment for every scheme spec
<http://gbiv.com/protocols/uri/rev-2002/rfc2396bis.html#absolute-uri>.
I am ready to submit a draft-07 and will do so on Saturday evening,
whether or not fixes are needed -- I'll be too busy the next six
weeks to do any more work on the URI spec.
A diff from draft 06 can be seen at
http://gbiv.com/protocols/uri/rev-2002/diff-draft-06
Please review.
....Roy
Received on Saturday, 25 September 2004 10:02:02 UTC