I have added a note similar to what Graham suggested to the introduction of relative references: <http://gbiv.com/protocols/uri/rev-2002/rfc2396bis.html#hierarchical> and a table to the section on changes for mapping obsolete bnf rules to their definitions: <http://gbiv.com/protocols/uri/rev-2002/rfc2396bis.html#changes> and a paragraph to the sections on scheme and absolute-URI to indicate that scheme specifications must define a syntax that is a subset of absolute-URI and thus don't have to redefine fragment for every scheme spec <http://gbiv.com/protocols/uri/rev-2002/rfc2396bis.html#absolute-uri>. I am ready to submit a draft-07 and will do so on Saturday evening, whether or not fixes are needed -- I'll be too busy the next six weeks to do any more work on the URI spec. A diff from draft 06 can be seen at http://gbiv.com/protocols/uri/rev-2002/diff-draft-06 Please review. ....RoyReceived on Saturday, 25 September 2004 10:02:02 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Sunday, 10 October 2021 22:17:46 UTC