- From: Roy T. Fielding <fielding@gbiv.com>
- Date: Sat, 25 Sep 2004 19:18:40 -0700
- To: Mike Brown <mike@skew.org>
- Cc: uri@w3.org
> In both places, by "subset", I assume you mean that the scheme can > define any > syntax (not necessarily in terms of rfc2396bis rules) such that a URI > conforming to that syntax would not fail to also conform to the > absolute-URI > syntax rule. I kinda wish it were stated more like that, but I suppose > it's > good enough as "subset". Hmm, good point -- we want to emphasize conformance of the strings, not of the rules. How about URI scheme specifications must define their own syntax such that all strings matching their scheme-specific syntax will also match the <absolute-URI> grammar. ....Roy
Received on Sunday, 26 September 2004 02:19:13 UTC