W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > uri@w3.org > September 2004

RE: FTP URIs - time to document the way browsers really behave?

From: Larry Masinter <LMM@acm.org>
Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 21:51:57 -0700
To: "'Alun Jones'" <alunj@microsoft.com>
Cc: uri@w3c.org
Message-id: <0I4S001L8DIQN7@mailsj-v1.corp.adobe.com>


If most implementations agree, then we should fix the spec to
match how they work. When we wrote the original spec for
'ftp', we were just trying to nail down *some* predictable
behavior.

It would be good to get review from those in charge
of popular implementations of the revised text.

Larry

Received on Wednesday, 29 September 2004 14:44:07 UTC

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Walter Underwood: "Re: FTP URIs - time to document the way browsers really behave?"
Previous message: Graham Klyne: "Re: file: URI scheme"
In reply to: Alun Jones: "FTP URIs - time to document the way browsers really behave?"
Next in thread: Walter Underwood: "Re: FTP URIs - time to document the way browsers really behave?"

Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]
Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]
Help: [ How to use the archives ] [ Search in the archives ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Sunday, 10 October 2021 22:17:46 UTC