- From: Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@jabber.org>
- Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 14:53:09 -0600
- To: Martin Duerst <duerst@w3.org>
- Cc: uri@w3.org, xmppwg@jabber.org
On Sep 28, 2004, at 12:26 AM, Martin Duerst wrote: >> > - In 2.4.1, I think it might help readers to explain that the >> > first few steps of "XMPP handling" are similar e.g. to HTTP >> > authentication, whereas the later steps are similar to what >> > happens e.g. in the case of a 'mailto:' scheme. >> > [I hope I got this right; I think when I was asking in my >> > previous comments about what's really going on, I was trying >> > to find out how the stanza would be composed from data in >> > the URI, but that's not what's happening, similar to the >> > plain use of mailto:, where the user has to compose the >> > message before actually sending the mail.] >> >> It strikes me that this is more appropriate for a document such as the >> promised XMPP Implementation Guidelines. > > I guess I have to disagree on this one: An URI scheme definition > is not only a definition of syntax, but also a definition of > semantics. And helping the reader understand that is quite > relevant in the document at hand. I've added some text about this to my working copy. >> Once I finish further text adjustments and add the internationalized >> domain names to the examples, I will submit a revised version of this >> specification to the Secretariat. > > > Looking forward to it. Actually I had already submitted draft-saintandre-xmpp-uri-05: http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-saintandre-xmpp-uri-05.txt I will post a separate message regarding the query component of XMPP URIs. Peter
Received on Tuesday, 28 September 2004 20:53:42 UTC