[closed] Re: 3.2 Scoping of Names
[closed] Re: a note on spec link usability
[closed] Re: An unfulfilled requirement maybe?
[closed] Re: clarification of p:pipeline-library and p:import
[closed] Re: clarify 5.11 p:pipe definition and refering to p:pipeline inputs
[closed] Re: Comment 30, Parameter inputs as strings
[closed] Re: Comment: untrusted environments and security
[closed] Re: Comment: version and forward compatibility
[closed] Re: Comments from the XSLT WG on the XProc Last Call Document
[closed] Re: comments on XProc last-call draft
[closed] Re: Compound steps with empty subpipelines
[closed] Re: Does a primary output have to be connected in all branches?
[closed] Re: Dynamic errors, choose
[closed] Re: Embedding one pipeline into another (or "defaulting pipeline libraries")
[closed] Re: headers in p:http-request
[closed] Re: http-request/etc. and URI encoded references
[closed] Re: Improve XProc suitability for localization
[closed] Re: Last Call Comment on XProc - http://www.w3.org/TR/2007/WD-xproc-20070920/
[closed] Re: minor p:http-request issues
[closed] Re: Multiple imports
[closed] Re: Name Attributes and Fragment Identifiers
[closed] Re: normalization-form serialization option
[closed] Re: Output of p:xslt and p:xslt2 / xpointer
[closed] Re: p:add-xml-base with relative=true
[closed] Re: p:declare-step - atomic steps vs. empty pipelines
[closed] Re: p:function (a.k.a. a standard mechanism for XPath extensions within XProc)
[closed] Re: Please add Implementation and Test Suite info to the W3C XProc page
[closed] Re: Properties of an implicit output port
[closed] Re: propose changing p:directory-list filter option
[closed] Re: proposed changes and clarifications to p:load
[closed] Re: put optional step in different namespace
[closed] Re: Questions + comments on XProc WD 14 December 2007
[closed] Re: Saxonica Comments on XProc last-call draft, sections 1 and 2
[closed] Re: Saxonica Comments on XProc last-call draft, sections 3 and 4
[closed] Re: Saxonica comments on XProc Last-Call WD, sections 5-7
[closed] Re: sequence-consistency of choose/try branches
[closed] Re: Should defaulted ports be named?
[closed] Re: Standard (ECMAScript) interface for invoking XProc
[closed] Re: Typo in p:label-elements
[closed] Re: what does p:episode actually mean ?
[closed] Re: xinclude processing and XProc
[closed] Re: xsl-formatter
[closed] Re: XSLT 1.0 and XSLT 2.0
[closed] Re: XSLT pattern matching in p:viewport - matching descendant nodes
A few items cherry-picked from comment #54
Comments on Editor's Draft 9 January 2008
Compound steps with empty subpipelines
declare-step - atomic steps vs. empty pipelines
Default bindings for non-primary inputs
Execution order of steps in a pipeline
I'm _still_ confused about 3.8 Extension elements
Implicit parameter input on p:pipeline
Improve XProc suitability for localization
Last Call Comment on XProc - http://www.w3.org/TR/2007/WD-xproc-20070920/
normalization-form serialization option
Output from for-each that gets evaluated zero times
p:declare-step - atomic steps vs. empty pipelines
p:set-attributes - attributes with the "xmlns" prefix
Questions + comments on XProc WD 14 December 2007
Typo in p:label-elements
Using options in XSLT match patterns
XSLT 1.0 and XSLT 2.0
XSLT pattern matching in p:viewport - matching descendant nodes
Last message date: Wednesday, 30 January 2008 21:08:07 UTC