RE: [closed] Re: p:declare-step - atomic steps vs. empty pipelines

Found two more:

- section 5.1.2 (Document inputs): The current text associated with
error code XS0042 is: "It is a static error if the declaration of a
document input port inside a p:declare-step." I think the second part of
the sentence got lost somewhere, and it should read: "It is a static
error if the declaration of a document input port inside a
p:declare-step CONTAINS A BINDING UNLESS IT IS DECLARING AND BINDING AN
INPUT PORT FOR A P:PIPELINE."

- section 5.4 (p:output): "It is a static error (err:XS0029) to specify
a binding for a p:output inside a p:declare-step." I think it should
say: ""It is a static error (err:XS0029) to specify a binding for a
p:output inside a p:declare-step UNLESS IT IS DECLARING AND BINDING AN
OUTPUT PORT FOR A P:PIPELINE."

Vojtech


> -----Original Message-----
> From: public-xml-processing-model-comments-request@w3.org 
> [mailto:public-xml-processing-model-comments-request@w3.org] 
> On Behalf Of Toman_Vojtech@emc.com
> Sent: Friday, January 25, 2008 3:10 PM
> To: public-xml-processing-model-comments@w3.org
> Subject: RE: [closed] Re: p:declare-step - atomic steps vs. 
> empty pipelines
> 
> 
> Speaking of improper error codes or confusing error messages, 
> there are a couple of more cases that I mentioned in an older 
> e-mail (12/20/07) and that still don't appear to be fixed:
> 
> - The text for dynamic error err:XD0014 should be more 
> generic so it is meaningful both for c:parameter and c:parameter-set
> 
> - err:XS0035 mixes two cases together: declaration of 
> parameter inputs cannot contain bindings + the owner pipeline 
> has no primary parameter input port
> 
> - err:XS0043 - is this really a correct error code if a pipe 
> binding is found in an input declaration?
> 
> Regards,
> Vojtech
> 
> --
> Vojtech Toman
> Principal Software Engineer
> EMC Corporation
> 
> Aert van Nesstraat 45
> 3012 CA Rotterdam
> The Netherlands
> 
> Toman_Vojtech@emc.com 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: public-xml-processing-model-comments-request@w3.org
> > [mailto:public-xml-processing-model-comments-request@w3.org]
> > On Behalf Of Norman Walsh
> > Sent: Friday, January 25, 2008 2:42 PM
> > To: public-xml-processing-model-comments@w3.org
> > Subject: [closed] Re: p:declare-step - atomic steps vs. empty 
> > pipelines
> > 
> > / Toman_Vojtech@emc.com was heard to say:
> > | OK. Just one thing: static error XS0027 is referred to in
> > two places:
> > | Syntactic Shortcut for Option Values (4.7.1), and in Syntax
> > Summaries
> > | (3.7), each time with a different meaning. I guess this is
> > a typo and
> > | a different error code should be used for options.
> > 
> > Right. Fixed. Thanks!
> > 
> >                                         Be seeing you,
> >                                           norm
> > 
> > --
> > Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> | Everything should be made 
> as simple as
> > http://nwalsh.com/            | possible, but no simpler.
> > 
> 
> 
>

Received on Friday, 25 January 2008 14:56:54 UTC