[closed] Re: clarify 5.11 p:pipe definition and refering to p:pipeline inputs

James,

I think this issue has been overtaken by our recent syntax changes.
If you disagree, please feel free to raise this issue again in our
next Last Call :-)

/ James Fuller <james.fuller.2007@gmail.com> was heard to say:
| http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/docs/langspec.html#dt-subpipeline
|
| since the step attribute can refer to a pipeline name, might be useful
| to clarify this explicitly under the p:pipe section.
|
| cheers, Jim Fuller

                                        Be seeing you,
                                          norm

-- 
Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> | Linux. Because rebooting is for
http://nwalsh.com/            | hardware upgrades.