[closed] Re: Last Call Comment on XProc - http://www.w3.org/TR/2007/WD-xproc-20070920/

I'm closing this issue for now. If you're unsatisfied with our
response, please feel free to raise it again when we go through our
next Last Call.

/ ht@inf.ed.ac.uk (Henry S. Thompson) was heard to say:
| Thanks for calling our attention to the work of the mobileOK checker
| Task Force on encoding HTTP responses in XML, which we have looked at
| with interest.
|
| In the end, we decided to stay with our own, considerably simpler,
| serialisation of responses, primarily on the grounds that our
| requirements for faithful transcription of responses is much lower
| than yours and the resulting simplification is of real value to our
| users.
|
| Sorry for the delay in replying,
|
| ht, for the XML Processing Model WG
| --
|  Henry S. Thompson, HCRC Language Technology Group, University of Edinburgh
|                      Half-time member of W3C Team
|     2 Buccleuch Place, Edinburgh EH8 9LW, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440
|             Fax: (44) 131 650-4587, e-mail: ht@inf.ed.ac.uk
|                    URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/
| [mail really from me _always_ has this .sig -- mail without it is forged spam]

                                        Be seeing you,
                                          norm

-- 
Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> | Everything should be made as simple as
http://nwalsh.com/            | possible, but no simpler.