[closed] Re: p:function (a.k.a. a standard mechanism for XPath extensions within XProc)

/ Vasil Rangelov <boen.robot@gmail.com> was heard to say:
| I realize I'm opening a can of worms, possibly ending up in causing much
| delay in the spec's development, but as XSLT 1.0 has shown, it's a REALLY
| important thing to consider. I'd say it is as important as providing means
| of creating custom steps (which has been available since the first draft I
| have seen thankfully).

The WG considered this suggestion and has decided not to persue it for
version 1.0 of XProc.

                                        Be seeing you,
                                          norm

-- 
Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> | Human felicity is produced not so much
http://nwalsh.com/            | by great pieces of good fortune that
                              | seldom happen, as by little advantages
                              | that occur every day.--Benjamin Franklin