public-xml-processing-model-comments@w3.org from January 2008 by author

Alex Milowski

• [closed] Re: Name Attributes and Fragment Identifiers (Thursday, 24 January)
• Re: normalization-form serialization option (Wednesday, 16 January)
• [closed] Re: http-request/etc. and URI encoded references (Wednesday, 16 January)
• [closed] Re: xsl-formatter (Thursday, 10 January)
• [closed] Re: normalization-form serialization option (Thursday, 10 January)
• [closed] Re: headers in p:http-request (Thursday, 10 January)

Florent Georges

• Re: Using options in XSLT match patterns (Wednesday, 30 January)

Henry S. Thompson

• Re: Default bindings for non-primary inputs (Friday, 25 January)
• Re: Output from for-each that gets evaluated zero times (Friday, 25 January)
• Re: Last Call Comment on XProc - http://www.w3.org/TR/2007/WD-xproc-20070920/ (Friday, 25 January)
• Re: Execution order of steps in a pipeline (Thursday, 24 January)
• Re: Execution order of steps in a pipeline (Wednesday, 23 January)
• Re: Compound steps with empty subpipelines (Wednesday, 16 January)
• Re: Comments on Editor's Draft 9 January 2008 (Friday, 11 January)
• Re: I'm _still_ confused about 3.8 Extension elements (Wednesday, 9 January)

Jirka Kosek

• Re: Improve XProc suitability for localization (Thursday, 3 January)

Nikolay Fiykov

• Re: A few items cherry-picked from comment #54 (Wednesday, 30 January)
• Re: [closed] Re: comments on XProc last-call draft (Wednesday, 30 January)

Norman Walsh

• [closed] Re: Questions + comments on XProc WD 14 December 2007 (Tuesday, 29 January)
• Re: Questions + comments on XProc WD 14 December 2007 (Monday, 28 January)
• Re: [closed] Re: p:declare-step - atomic steps vs. empty pipelines (Friday, 25 January)
• Re: Implicit parameter input on p:pipeline (Friday, 25 January)
• Re: Implicit parameter input on p:pipeline (Friday, 25 January)
• Re: Implicit parameter input on p:pipeline (Friday, 25 January)
• Re: Execution order of steps in a pipeline (Friday, 25 January)
• [closed] Re: XSLT pattern matching in p:viewport - matching descendant nodes (Friday, 25 January)
• Re: Comments on Editor's Draft 9 January 2008 (Friday, 25 January)
• Re: Comments on Editor's Draft 9 January 2008 (Friday, 25 January)
• Re: Questions + comments on XProc WD 14 December 2007 (Friday, 25 January)
• Default bindings for non-primary inputs (Friday, 25 January)
• Output from for-each that gets evaluated zero times (Friday, 25 January)
• [closed] Re: Properties of an implicit output port (Friday, 25 January)
• [closed] Re: sequence-consistency of choose/try branches (Friday, 25 January)
• Re: [closed] Re: An unfulfilled requirement maybe? (Friday, 25 January)
• [closed] Re: Should defaulted ports be named? (Friday, 25 January)
• [closed] Re: Comments from the XSLT WG on the XProc Last Call Document (Friday, 25 January)
• [closed] Re: Does a primary output have to be connected in all branches? (Friday, 25 January)
• [closed] Re: Last Call Comment on XProc - http://www.w3.org/TR/2007/WD-xproc-20070920/ (Friday, 25 January)
• A few items cherry-picked from comment #54 (Friday, 25 January)
• [closed] Re: comments on XProc last-call draft (Friday, 25 January)
• [closed] Re: p:declare-step - atomic steps vs. empty pipelines (Friday, 25 January)
• [closed] Re: XSLT 1.0 and XSLT 2.0 (Friday, 25 January)
• [closed] Re: Compound steps with empty subpipelines (Thursday, 24 January)
• [closed] Re: Typo in p:label-elements (Thursday, 24 January)
• [closed] Re: clarification of p:pipeline-library and p:import (Thursday, 24 January)
• [closed] Re: put optional step in different namespace (Thursday, 24 January)
• [closed] Re: Standard (ECMAScript) interface for invoking XProc (Thursday, 24 January)
• [closed] Re: Embedding one pipeline into another (or "defaulting pipeline libraries") (Thursday, 24 January)
• Re: XSLT 1.0 and XSLT 2.0 (Thursday, 24 January)
• [closed] Re: a note on spec link usability (Thursday, 24 January)
• [closed] Re: clarify 5.11 p:pipe definition and refering to p:pipeline inputs (Thursday, 24 January)
• [closed] Re: Dynamic errors, choose (Thursday, 24 January)
• [closed] Re: xinclude processing and XProc (Thursday, 24 January)
• [closed] Re: Multiple imports (Thursday, 24 January)
• [closed] Re: Improve XProc suitability for localization (Thursday, 24 January)
• [closed] Re: Comment: version and forward compatibility (Thursday, 24 January)
• Re: Compound steps with empty subpipelines (Wednesday, 23 January)
• Re: declare-step - atomic steps vs. empty pipelines (Thursday, 17 January)
• Re: p:declare-step - atomic steps vs. empty pipelines (Thursday, 17 January)
• [closed] Re: propose changing p:directory-list filter option (Thursday, 17 January)
• [closed] Re: proposed changes and clarifications to p:load (Thursday, 17 January)
• [closed] Re: Please add Implementation and Test Suite info to the W3C XProc page (Thursday, 17 January)
• [closed] Re: what does p:episode actually mean ? (Wednesday, 9 January)
• [closed] Re: 3.2 Scoping of Names (Wednesday, 9 January)
• [closed] Re: Comment 30, Parameter inputs as strings (Wednesday, 9 January)
• [closed] Re: Output of p:xslt and p:xslt2 / xpointer (Wednesday, 9 January)
• [closed] Re: p:add-xml-base with relative=true (Wednesday, 9 January)
• Re: Improve XProc suitability for localization (Wednesday, 9 January)
• [closed] Re: Comment: untrusted environments and security (Wednesday, 9 January)
• [closed] Re: Saxonica comments on XProc Last-Call WD, sections 5-7 (Wednesday, 9 January)
• [closed] Re: Saxonica Comments on XProc last-call draft, sections 3 and 4 (Wednesday, 9 January)
• [closed] Re: Saxonica Comments on XProc last-call draft, sections 1 and 2 (Wednesday, 9 January)
• [closed] Re: An unfulfilled requirement maybe? (Wednesday, 9 January)
• Re: I'm _still_ confused about 3.8 Extension elements (Tuesday, 8 January)
• Re: I'm _still_ confused about 3.8 Extension elements (Tuesday, 8 January)
• [closed] Re: p:function (a.k.a. a standard mechanism for XPath extensions within XProc) (Wednesday, 2 January)
• [closed] Re: minor p:http-request issues (Wednesday, 2 January)

Toman_Vojtech@emc.com

• RE: Using options in XSLT match patterns (Wednesday, 30 January)
• Using options in XSLT match patterns (Wednesday, 30 January)
• RE: Questions + comments on XProc WD 14 December 2007 (Tuesday, 29 January)
• RE: Implicit parameter input on p:pipeline (Monday, 28 January)
• RE: Comments on Editor's Draft 9 January 2008 (Monday, 28 January)
• RE: Questions + comments on XProc WD 14 December 2007 (Monday, 28 January)
• RE: Default bindings for non-primary inputs (Monday, 28 January)
• RE: [closed] Re: p:declare-step - atomic steps vs. empty pipelines (Friday, 25 January)
• RE: [closed] Re: p:declare-step - atomic steps vs. empty pipelines (Friday, 25 January)
• RE: Implicit parameter input on p:pipeline (Friday, 25 January)
• RE: Implicit parameter input on p:pipeline (Friday, 25 January)
• RE: Execution order of steps in a pipeline (Thursday, 24 January)
• Implicit parameter input on p:pipeline (Thursday, 24 January)
• RE: Comments on Editor's Draft 9 January 2008 (Wednesday, 23 January)
• Execution order of steps in a pipeline (Wednesday, 23 January)
• Typo in p:label-elements (Friday, 18 January)
• p:set-attributes - attributes with the "xmlns" prefix (Friday, 18 January)
• RE: p:declare-step - atomic steps vs. empty pipelines (Friday, 18 January)
• Compound steps with empty subpipelines (Wednesday, 16 January)
• XSLT pattern matching in p:viewport - matching descendant nodes (Tuesday, 15 January)
• RE: declare-step - atomic steps vs. empty pipelines (Monday, 14 January)
• p:declare-step - atomic steps vs. empty pipelines (Monday, 14 January)
• Comments on Editor's Draft 9 January 2008 (Thursday, 10 January)

Vasil Rangelov

• RE: declare-step - atomic steps vs. empty pipelines (Tuesday, 15 January)
• RE: declare-step - atomic steps vs. empty pipelines (Monday, 14 January)
• Re: [closed] Re: An unfulfilled requirement maybe? (Saturday, 12 January)

Last message date: Wednesday, 30 January 2008 21:08:07 UTC