- From: Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>
- Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2008 15:27:20 -0500
- To: public-xml-processing-model-comments@w3.org
- Message-ID: <m27ihz7yvr.fsf@nwalsh.com>
/ James Fuller <james.fuller.2007@gmail.com> was heard to say: | test-suite sparked my mind on what effects xinclude may have during | processing of an XProc document. | | There maybe times when you would want to give the pipeline author a | chance to specifically disallow xinclude processing (and have | implementator handle this)...perhaps a flag on pipeline? | | also, thinking about the knock on effects of using xinclude within | p:inline elements. | | thoughts? Any processing that a pipeline processor might perform on a pipeline document before it is evaluated is implementation defined. I've added a note to the spec to that effect. The semantics of XProc do not include automatically expanding XInclude elements that appear in the pipeline document. Be seeing you, norm -- Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> | It is not failure of others to http://nwalsh.com/ | appreciate your abilities that should | trouble you, but rather your failure to | appreciate theirs.-- Confucius
Received on Thursday, 24 January 2008 20:27:41 UTC