- From: <Toman_Vojtech@emc.com>
- Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2008 06:42:00 -0500
- To: <public-xml-processing-model-comments@w3.org>
Hi all, Since the p:pipeline now always contains an implict "source" input port and an implicit "result" output port, I wonder if the same cannot be done with the parameter inputs. Section 2.5 says: "Additionally, if a p:pipeline does not declare any parameter input ports, but contains a step which has a primary parameter input port, then an implicit primary parameter input port (named 'parameters') will be added to the pipeline. (If the pipeline declares an ordinary input named 'parameters', the implicit primary parameter input port will be named 'parameters1'. If that's not available, then 'parameters2', etc. until an available name is found.)" Cannot this be changed to something like: "All p:pipeline pipelines have an implicit primary parameter input port named 'parameters'. Any parameter input ports that the p:pipeline declares explicitly are in addition to this port and may not be declared primary." Regards, Vojtech -- Vojtech Toman Principal Software Engineer EMC Corporation Aert van Nesstraat 45 3012 CA Rotterdam The Netherlands Toman_Vojtech@emc.com
Received on Thursday, 24 January 2008 11:38:16 UTC