Friday, 28 February 2003
Thursday, 27 February 2003
- RE: Dubray paper comments + questions
- Re: Dubray paper comments + questions
- RE: Dubray paper comments + questions
- Re: Dubray paper comments + questions
- RE: Dubray paper comments + questions
- RE: Dubray paper comments + questions
- Re: Dubray paper comments + questions
- Re: Dubray paper comments + questions
- RE: Dubray paper comments + questions
- Re: Dubray paper comments + questions
- RE: Dubray paper comments + questions
- Re: Dubray paper comments + questions
- Re: Dubray paper comments + questions
Wednesday, 26 February 2003
- RE: Dubray paper comments + questions
- RE: Dubray paper comments + questions [added discussion on SOA]
- RE: Dubray paper comments + questions [added discussion on SOA]
- RE: Dubray paper comments + questions
- Re: Dubray paper comments + questions
- Re: Dubray paper comments + questions
- RE: Dubray paper comments + questions
- Re: Dubray paper comments + questions
- RE: Dubray paper comments + questions
- RE: Dubray paper comments + questions
- RE: Dubray paper comments + questions
- RE: Dubray paper comments + questions
- RE: Dubray paper comments + questions
- RE: Dubray paper comments + questions
- RE: Dubray paper comments + questions
- Re: Dubray paper comments + questions
- Re: Dubray paper comments + questions
- RE: Dubray paper comments + questions
- RE: Dubray paper comments + questions
- RE: Orchestration "standards" pros and cons
- RE: Dubray paper comments + questions
- Orchestration "standards" pros and cons
- RE: Dubray paper comments + questions
Tuesday, 25 February 2003
Monday, 24 February 2003
Saturday, 22 February 2003
Friday, 21 February 2003
Tuesday, 18 February 2003
Monday, 17 February 2003
Saturday, 15 February 2003
Sunday, 16 February 2003
Friday, 14 February 2003
- Introduction
- RE: Behavior of compensating transaction under "initiator" and "participant" role
- RE: Behavior of compensating transaction under "initiator" and "participant" role
- RE: Approaches to Web Services Choreography [was Same model for both Public and Private process ??]
Thursday, 13 February 2003
Tuesday, 11 February 2003
Thursday, 13 February 2003
Wednesday, 12 February 2003
- RE: Approaches to Web Services Choreography [was Same model for both Public and Private process ??]
- Re: Approaches to Web Services Choreography [was Same model for both Public and Private process ??]
- Re: Face to Face info?
- Fwd: Face to Face info?
- RE: Approaches to Web Services Choreography [was Same model for both Public and Private process ??]
- RE: Approaches to Web Services Choreography [was Same model for both Public and Private process ??]
- RE: Approaches to Web Services Choreography [was Same model for both Public and Private process ??]
- Re: Approaches to Web Services Choreography [was Same model for both Public and Private process ??]
Tuesday, 11 February 2003
- Introduction
- Introduction
- RE: Approaches to Web Services Choreography [was Same model for both Public and Private process ??]
- RE: Approaches to Web Services Choreography [was Same model for both Public and Private process ??]
Monday, 10 February 2003
Tuesday, 11 February 2003
- RE: Approaches to Web Services Choreography [was Same model for both Public and Private process ??]
- RE: Approaches to Web Services Choreography [was Same model for both Public and Private process ??]
Monday, 10 February 2003
Sunday, 9 February 2003
Friday, 7 February 2003
Thursday, 6 February 2003
Wednesday, 5 February 2003
- RE: Same model for both Public and Private process ??
- RE: Same model for both Public and Private process ??
- RE: Same model for both Public and Private process ??
Tuesday, 4 February 2003
- RE: Same model for both Public and Private process ??
- RE: Same model for both Public and Private process ??
Monday, 3 February 2003
- Re: Same model for both Public and Private process ??
- RE: Yet Another Choreography Specification
- Re: Same model for both Public and Private process ??
- RE: Yet Another Choreography Specification
- RE: Same model for both Public and Private process ??
- RE: Same model for both Public and Private process ??
- RE: Same model for both Public and Private process ??
- Re: Same model for both Public and Private process ??
- RE: Same model for both Public and Private process ??
- Introduction
- RE: Same model for both Public and Private process ??
- RE: Same model for both Public and Private process ??
- Re: Same model for both Public and Private process ??
- RE: Yet Another Choreography Specification
- RE: Yet Another Choreography Specification
Sunday, 2 February 2003
- RE: Yet Another Choreography Specification
- Re: Same model for both Public and Private process ??
- RE: Yet Another Choreography Specification
- Same model for both Public and Private process ??