- From: Pae Choi <paechoi@earthlink.net>
- Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2003 02:59:50 -0500
- To: "Jean-Jacques Dubray" <jjd@eigner.com>, "'Assaf Arkin'" <arkin@intalio.com>, "'Ricky Ho'" <riho@cisco.com>
- Cc: <public-ws-chor@w3.org>
This is an interesting thread and I'd like to make some comments. > As I mentioned several times on this list and others I believe that > there are 3 entities that need to be modeled (at least): > - Collaboration (between business partners) This is definitely needed component. > - Internal business processes I don't see why we need to dictate the internal business processes. As long as we have defintions for inter-business processes, so-called publicly visible agreement points, however each participants carry out their responsibilities throughout the internal business precesses should be their own right. This will clearly seperate two business processes, inter-business process(a.k.a., c12y) and intra-business process(a.k.a., workflow) and make the intra-business process transparent to the other sides. Taking a simple example from the OO sense, we define the publicly visible "interfaces" for the services so called the abstract definition and the reference implentations(RI) who carry out the responsibilites. We may and more than likely have multiple RIs which are transparent to the the other ends, users, participants, or so. The point here is that we only need to define the interfaces for the the item #1, "Collaboration", and the definition of internal busines processes, i.e., RIs, be left to the those who carry out the responsibilites. More concretly, say we have a service in the web-tier, Account Balance Statement, which is publicly visible service and the actual process whether the process has a sequence of realization or not through out the business, persistence, and other tiers. That should not be the concern for those who access the service as long as it gets the result. > - long running behavior of components (such as order entry) when > participating in business processes and collaborations. I can see the needs for this as well. Any comments? Pae
Received on Monday, 10 February 2003 19:05:43 UTC