public-ws-addressing-comments@w3.org from May 2005 by thread

Re: [Editorial][SOAP] IRI for SOAP 1.2 Module and SOAP 1.1 Extension Mark Nottingham (Friday, 20 May)

WS-Addressing LC Issue 57 Closed Marc Hadley (Friday, 20 May)

WS-Addressing LC Issue 73 Closed Marc Hadley (Friday, 20 May)

Last Call Issues #46 Vikas Deolaliker (Wednesday, 18 May)

Lc66: Presentation of typing information in element decsriptions Katy Warr (Tuesday, 17 May)

Re: Question regarding cardinality of [destination] Nilo Mitra (TX/EUS) (Tuesday, 17 May)

WS-Addr LC Issue 34 Closed Marc Hadley (Monday, 16 May)

Comment from WSDL group on ReplyTo Glen Daniels (Monday, 16 May)

WS-Addr LC Issue 33 Closed Marc Hadley (Friday, 13 May)

WS Description WG comments on WS-A (editorial) Jonathan Marsh (Friday, 13 May)

LC Editorial Comment for WS-Addressing Core Specification Yalcinalp, Umit (Thursday, 12 May)

IRI escaping when constructing a reply Jonathan Marsh (Thursday, 12 May)

WS-Addressing 1.0 Core -- XML infoset representation of EPR > Information model Anish Karmarkar (Thursday, 12 May)

WS-Addressing 1.0 Core - what is a 'request' and what is a 'reply'? Anish Karmarkar (Thursday, 12 May)

WS-Addressing 1.0 Core -- immutability of MAPs Anish Karmarkar (Thursday, 12 May)

WS-Addressing 1.0 Core -- How does one extend the abstract properties of an endpoint reference Anish Karmarkar (Thursday, 12 May)

WS-Addressing 1.0 Core - section 2.1 -- unclear wording regarding conflicts between metadata (editorial) Anish Karmarkar (Thursday, 12 May)

WS-Addressing 1.0 Core - section 2.1 -- what does 'each of the EPRs' refer to Anish Karmarkar (Thursday, 12 May)

WS-Addressing 1.0 Core -- Notational conventions not explained Anish Karmarkar (Thursday, 12 May)

WS-Addressing 1.0 Core, inconsistent use of 'Endpoint Reference' (ed nit) Anish Karmarkar (Thursday, 12 May)

WS-Addressing 1.0 Core -- requirement of XML 1.0 Anish Karmarkar (Thursday, 12 May)

WS-Addressing 1.0 Core - ed nit - section 1.2 (references) Anish Karmarkar (Thursday, 12 May)

WS-Addressing Core, section 1.1 editorial nit Anish Karmarkar (Thursday, 12 May)

Editorial nit regd Example 1-1 in Core Anish Karmarkar (Thursday, 12 May)

Editorial nit - WS-Addressing Core Anish Karmarkar (Thursday, 12 May)

lc13 closed David Orchard (Wednesday, 11 May)

lc7 closed David Orchard (Wednesday, 11 May)

Re: [Editorial][Core] Section 4 Mark Nottingham (Wednesday, 11 May)

Comments on WS-A SOAP Binding Nilo Mitra (TX/EUS) (Wednesday, 11 May)

LC Comment: (editorial) Security implications of [message id] in re-transmissions David Hull (Wednesday, 11 May)

Comments on WS-A Core Nilo Mitra (TX/EUS) (Wednesday, 11 May)

Uniqueness of [message id] Hugo Haas (Wednesday, 11 May)

LC Comment (Core and SOAP): Security model is insufficient Marc Hadley (Wednesday, 11 May)

[message id] should be optional David Hull (Tuesday, 10 May)

introduction of MAP and MEP terms paul.downey@bt.com (Monday, 9 May)

WS-Addressing Last Call issue 64 closed Bergersen, Rebecca (Monday, 9 May)

lc59 Missing xml namespace prefix declaration Winkler, Steve (Monday, 9 May)

LC45 and LC47 closed. Martin Gudgin (Monday, 9 May)

LC42,43,48,49,51 closed Martin Gudgin (Monday, 9 May)

lc32: effect of wsa:IsReferenceParameter on validation Jeff Mischkinsky (Monday, 9 May)

RE: Editorial: Wording clarifications in Core Section 4 Jonathan Marsh (Monday, 9 May)

RE: [Editorial][Core] Table 3-1 Jonathan Marsh (Monday, 9 May)

RE: [Editorial][SOAP] MessageId vs MessageID Jonathan Marsh (Monday, 9 May)

Re: [Editorial][Core] Example 3-1 lc40 Robert Freund (Monday, 9 May)

LC Comment: (editorial) Processors unconstrained in the face of non-compliant messages. David Hull (Thursday, 5 May)

LC Comment: Message compliance David Hull (Thursday, 5 May)

LC Comment: When is a fault/reply expected? David Hull (Thursday, 5 May)

LC Comment: "... the processor MUST fault" in section 3.2 is vacuous. David Hull (Thursday, 5 May)

LC Comment:(editorial) Use of mustUnderstand=1 in example David Hull (Thursday, 5 May)

LC Comment: (editorial) Definitions of MAPs in core section 3 should have their own subsection David Hull (Thursday, 5 May)

LC Comment: Rewriting by intermediaries David Hull (Thursday, 5 May)

LC Comment: Multiple reply relationships David Hull (Thursday, 5 May)

LC Comment: MAPs in EPR reference params David Hull (Thursday, 5 May)

LC Comment: Supported faults David Hull (Thursday, 5 May)

LC Comment: Uniqueness of [message id] David Hull (Thursday, 5 May)

lc28 Mixed notation and indirect terminology for MAPs (Closed) michael.eder@nokia.com (Thursday, 5 May)

LC 30 (Formal definition of wsa:isReferenceParameter) is resolved Yalcinalp, Umit (Tuesday, 3 May)

Another Security Consideration Jonathan Marsh (Tuesday, 3 May)

LC:14 Clearer wording for Table 3-1 Vikas Deolaliker (Tuesday, 3 May)

What does core section 3 actually require? David Hull (Tuesday, 3 May)

nonNegativeInteger or duration for RetryAfter Jacek Kopecky (Tuesday, 3 May)

content of fault detail Jacek Kopecky (Tuesday, 3 May)

mandatory fault reason Jacek Kopecky (Tuesday, 3 May)

mandatory action Jacek Kopecky (Tuesday, 3 May)

mandatory ReplyTo, handling replies in WS-Addressing Jacek Kopecky (Tuesday, 3 May)

no mustUnderstand extensibility Jacek Kopecky (Tuesday, 3 May)

dereferencing namespace URI - but no link (editorial) Jacek Kopecky (Tuesday, 3 May)

presentation of typing information in element descriptions Jacek Kopecky (Tuesday, 3 May)

use of IRIs in WS-Addressing Jacek Kopecky (Tuesday, 3 May)

ws-addressing LC review editorial comments Jacek Kopecky (Tuesday, 3 May)

Re: Clarify which fault if SOAP Action and wsa:Action don't match (SOAP, substantive) Nilo Mitra (TX/EUS) (Monday, 2 May)

WS-Addressing Last Call Issue 36 closed used your proposed resolution Bergersen, Rebecca (Monday, 2 May)

Re: SOAP Binding & Core: Interaction between Faults and [message id] and [reply endpoint] etc. Prasad Yendluri (Monday, 2 May)

Re: Last Call Comment (Core): WS-Addressing restricted to XML 1.0 or not? Prasad Yendluri (Monday, 2 May)

Re: Fwd: Last call issue with section 3.0: why does this spec man date a dispatching model? Nilo Mitra (TX/EUS) (Monday, 2 May)

Last message date: Tuesday, 24 May 2005 17:19:58 UTC