public-ws-addressing-comments@w3.org from May 2005 by author

Anish Karmarkar

WS-Addressing 1.0 Core -- XML infoset representation of EPR > Information model (Thursday, 12 May)
WS-Addressing 1.0 Core - what is a 'request' and what is a 'reply'? (Thursday, 12 May)
WS-Addressing 1.0 Core -- immutability of MAPs (Thursday, 12 May)
WS-Addressing 1.0 Core -- How does one extend the abstract properties of an endpoint reference (Thursday, 12 May)
WS-Addressing 1.0 Core - section 2.1 -- unclear wording regarding conflicts between metadata (editorial) (Thursday, 12 May)
WS-Addressing 1.0 Core - section 2.1 -- what does 'each of the EPRs' refer to (Thursday, 12 May)
WS-Addressing 1.0 Core -- Notational conventions not explained (Thursday, 12 May)
WS-Addressing 1.0 Core, inconsistent use of 'Endpoint Reference' (ed nit) (Thursday, 12 May)
WS-Addressing 1.0 Core -- requirement of XML 1.0 (Thursday, 12 May)
WS-Addressing 1.0 Core - ed nit - section 1.2 (references) (Thursday, 12 May)
WS-Addressing Core, section 1.1 editorial nit (Thursday, 12 May)
Editorial nit regd Example 1-1 in Core (Thursday, 12 May)
Editorial nit - WS-Addressing Core (Thursday, 12 May)

Arun Gupta

Re: WS-Addressing LC Issue 57 Closed (Monday, 23 May)

Bergersen, Rebecca

WS-Addressing Last Call issue 64 closed (Monday, 9 May)
WS-Addressing Last Call Issue 36 closed used your proposed resolution (Monday, 2 May)

Davanum Srinivas

Re: [Editorial][Core] Section 4 (Wednesday, 11 May)
Re: LC42,43,48,49,51 closed (Monday, 9 May)
Re: [Editorial][Core] Example 3-1 lc40 (Monday, 9 May)
Re: LC45 and LC47 closed. (Monday, 9 May)
Re: [Editorial][Core] Table 3-1 (Monday, 9 May)

David Hull

LC Comment: (editorial) Security implications of [message id] in re-transmissions (Wednesday, 11 May)
[message id] should be optional (Tuesday, 10 May)
LC Comment: (editorial) Processors unconstrained in the face of non-compliant messages. (Thursday, 5 May)
LC Comment: Message compliance (Thursday, 5 May)
LC Comment: When is a fault/reply expected? (Thursday, 5 May)
LC Comment: "... the processor MUST fault" in section 3.2 is vacuous. (Thursday, 5 May)
LC Comment:(editorial) Use of mustUnderstand=1 in example (Thursday, 5 May)
LC Comment: (editorial) Definitions of MAPs in core section 3 should have their own subsection (Thursday, 5 May)
LC Comment: Rewriting by intermediaries (Thursday, 5 May)
LC Comment: Multiple reply relationships (Thursday, 5 May)
LC Comment: MAPs in EPR reference params (Thursday, 5 May)
LC Comment: Supported faults (Thursday, 5 May)
LC Comment: Uniqueness of [message id] (Thursday, 5 May)
What does core section 3 actually require? (Tuesday, 3 May)

David Orchard

lc13 closed (Wednesday, 11 May)
lc7 closed (Wednesday, 11 May)

Glen Daniels

Comment from WSDL group on ReplyTo (Monday, 16 May)

Hugo Haas

Uniqueness of [message id] (Wednesday, 11 May)

Jacek Kopecky

Re: WS-Addressing Last Call issue 64 closed (Tuesday, 10 May)
nonNegativeInteger or duration for RetryAfter (Tuesday, 3 May)
content of fault detail (Tuesday, 3 May)
mandatory fault reason (Tuesday, 3 May)
mandatory action (Tuesday, 3 May)
mandatory ReplyTo, handling replies in WS-Addressing (Tuesday, 3 May)
no mustUnderstand extensibility (Tuesday, 3 May)
dereferencing namespace URI - but no link (editorial) (Tuesday, 3 May)
presentation of typing information in element descriptions (Tuesday, 3 May)
use of IRIs in WS-Addressing (Tuesday, 3 May)
ws-addressing LC review editorial comments (Tuesday, 3 May)

Jeff Mischkinsky

lc32: effect of wsa:IsReferenceParameter on validation (Monday, 9 May)

Jonathan Marsh

RE: use of IRIs in WS-Addressing (Tuesday, 24 May)
WS Description WG comments on WS-A (editorial) (Friday, 13 May)
IRI escaping when constructing a reply (Thursday, 12 May)
RE: Editorial: Wording clarifications in Core Section 4 (Monday, 9 May)
RE: [Editorial][Core] Table 3-1 (Monday, 9 May)
RE: [Editorial][SOAP] MessageId vs MessageID (Monday, 9 May)
Another Security Consideration (Tuesday, 3 May)

Katy Warr

Lc66: Presentation of typing information in element decsriptions (Tuesday, 17 May)

Marc Hadley

WS-Addressing LC Issue 57 Closed (Friday, 20 May)
WS-Addressing LC Issue 73 Closed (Friday, 20 May)
WS-Addr LC Issue 34 Closed (Monday, 16 May)
WS-Addr LC Issue 33 Closed (Friday, 13 May)
LC Comment (Core and SOAP): Security model is insufficient (Wednesday, 11 May)

Mark Nottingham

Re: [Editorial][SOAP] IRI for SOAP 1.2 Module and SOAP 1.1 Extension (Friday, 20 May)
Re: [Editorial][Core] Section 4 (Wednesday, 11 May)
Re: dereferencing namespace URI - but no link (editorial) (Wednesday, 11 May)
Re: What does core section 3 actually require? (Tuesday, 3 May)

Martin Gudgin

LC45 and LC47 closed. (Monday, 9 May)
LC42,43,48,49,51 closed (Monday, 9 May)
RE: LC45 and LC47 closed. (Monday, 9 May)

michael.eder@nokia.com

lc28 Mixed notation and indirect terminology for MAPs (Closed) (Thursday, 5 May)

Nilo Mitra (TX/EUS)

Re: Question regarding cardinality of [destination] (Tuesday, 17 May)
Comments on WS-A SOAP Binding (Wednesday, 11 May)
Comments on WS-A Core (Wednesday, 11 May)
Re: Clarify which fault if SOAP Action and wsa:Action don't match (SOAP, substantive) (Monday, 2 May)
Re: Fwd: Last call issue with section 3.0: why does this spec man date a dispatching model? (Monday, 2 May)

Paul Downey

Re: introduction of MAP and MEP terms (Monday, 9 May)

paul.downey@bt.com

introduction of MAP and MEP terms (Monday, 9 May)

Prasad Yendluri

Re: SOAP Binding & Core: Interaction between Faults and [message id] and [reply endpoint] etc. (Monday, 2 May)
Re: Last Call Comment (Core): WS-Addressing restricted to XML 1.0 or not? (Monday, 2 May)

Rimas Rekasius

Re: Question regarding cardinality of [destination] (Tuesday, 17 May)

Robert Freund

Re: [Editorial][Core] Example 3-1 lc40 (Monday, 9 May)

Tim Ewald

RE: Fwd: Last call issue with section 3.0: why does this spec mandate a dispatching model? (Tuesday, 3 May)

Vikas Deolaliker

Last Call Issues #46 (Wednesday, 18 May)
LC:14 Clearer wording for Table 3-1 (Tuesday, 3 May)

Winkler, Steve

lc59 Missing xml namespace prefix declaration (Monday, 9 May)

Yalcinalp, Umit

LC Editorial Comment for WS-Addressing Core Specification (Thursday, 12 May)
LC 30 (Formal definition of wsa:isReferenceParameter) is resolved (Tuesday, 3 May)

Last message date: Tuesday, 24 May 2005 17:19:58 UTC