LC Comment:(editorial) Use of mustUnderstand=1 in example from David Hull on 2005-05-05 (public-ws-addressing-comments@w3.org from May 2005)

From: David Hull <dmh@tibco.com>
Date: Thu, 05 May 2005 17:16:24 -0400
To: public-ws-addressing-comments@w3.org
Message-id: <427A8D28.3090709@tibco.com>

Examples 3-2 and 3-3 show SOAP messages with s:mustUnderstand=1 for the 
wsa:To header, but not for any other header.  The SOAP binding says 
nothing about the mustUnderstand header at all.  If mustUnderstand is 
meant to reflect that the wsa:To header is mandatory, it should be 
present on the wsa:Action as well, but more likely this is just an 
oversight and the s:mustUnderstand attribute should be removed to avoid 
muddying the waters.

Received on Thursday, 5 May 2005 21:16:29 UTC