- From: Jacek Kopecky <jacek.kopecky@deri.org>
- Date: Tue, 03 May 2005 15:37:06 +0200
- To: public-ws-addressing-comments@w3.org
Hi,
as an LC comment for WS-Addressing, I'm unclear about why the working
group chose to use IRIs instead of URIs. All the schemas specify anyURI
which would imply the values are URIs.
I'm aware that URIs and IRIs are interchangeable, in other words that
all IRIs can be represented as URIs. I'm unsure if the there is an
unambiguous transformation from URI to IRI.
Therefore I'd prefer the WS-Addressing specification to use the term
URI, perhaps stating that IRIs can be used (transformed into URIs as
described in the IRI spec). In any case, the distinction between URI and
IRI is mostly for presentation to a human operator, and IRIs do not
directly validate as xs:anyURI so the XML will carry URIs.
Best regards,
Jacek Kopecky
Ph.D. student researcher
Digital Enterprise Research Institute
University of Innsbruck
http://www.deri.org/
Received on Tuesday, 3 May 2005 13:37:11 UTC