- From: Jacek Kopecky <jacek.kopecky@deri.org>
- Date: Tue, 03 May 2005 15:37:06 +0200
- To: public-ws-addressing-comments@w3.org
Hi, as an LC comment for WS-Addressing, I'm unclear about why the working group chose to use IRIs instead of URIs. All the schemas specify anyURI which would imply the values are URIs. I'm aware that URIs and IRIs are interchangeable, in other words that all IRIs can be represented as URIs. I'm unsure if the there is an unambiguous transformation from URI to IRI. Therefore I'd prefer the WS-Addressing specification to use the term URI, perhaps stating that IRIs can be used (transformed into URIs as described in the IRI spec). In any case, the distinction between URI and IRI is mostly for presentation to a human operator, and IRIs do not directly validate as xs:anyURI so the XML will carry URIs. Best regards, Jacek Kopecky Ph.D. student researcher Digital Enterprise Research Institute University of Innsbruck http://www.deri.org/
Received on Tuesday, 3 May 2005 13:37:11 UTC