Monday, 31 March 2014
- Re: List of WebCrypto implementations
- RE: List of WebCrypto implementations
- Re: List of WebCrypto implementations
- List of WebCrypto implementations
Friday, 28 March 2014
- [Bug 25198] Turn KeyFormat into an enum
- [Bug 25198] New: Turn KeyFormat into an enum
- Re: RSA wrapping/unwrapping
- RSA wrapping/unwrapping
- Re: WebCrypto Security Analysis
- Re: JWK import/export as ECMAScript objects, rather than ArrayBuffer
- Re: JWK import/export as ECMAScript objects, rather than ArrayBuffer
- Re: JWK import/export as ECMAScript objects, rather than ArrayBuffer
- Re: WebCrypto Security Analysis
- Re: WebCrypto Security Analysis
Thursday, 27 March 2014
- Re: WebCrypto Security Analysis
- Re: WebCrypto Security Analysis
- Re: WebCrypto Security Analysis
- Re: JWK import/export as ECMAScript objects, rather than ArrayBuffer
- Re: JWK import/export as ECMAScript objects, rather than ArrayBuffer
- Re: JWK import/export as ECMAScript objects, rather than ArrayBuffer
- Re: JWK import/export as ECMAScript objects, rather than ArrayBuffer
- Re: JWK import/export as ECMAScript objects, rather than ArrayBuffer
- Re: JWK import/export as ECMAScript objects, rather than ArrayBuffer
- Re: JWK import/export as ECMAScript objects, rather than ArrayBuffer
Wednesday, 26 March 2014
- Call for Exclusions: Web Cryptography API
- Re: WebCrypto Security Analysis
- Re: WebCrypto Security Analysis
Tuesday, 25 March 2014
- W3C Web Crypto WG - thanks to all : Web Crypto API is going for last call
- Re: WebCrypto Security Analysis
- Last Call for Web Crypto API
- Re: WebCrypto Security Analysis
Monday, 24 March 2014
- RE: F2F and Workshop on WebCrypto v.Next June 1-4th Silicon Valley
- Re: W3C Web Crypto WG - no call today
- Bugzilla: confirm account creation
- W3C Web Crypto WG - no call today
Friday, 21 March 2014
Saturday, 22 March 2014
Friday, 21 March 2014
- Re: JWK import/export as ECMAScript objects, rather than ArrayBuffer
- Re: JWK import/export as ECMAScript objects, rather than ArrayBuffer
- Re: WebCrypto Security Analysis
- Re: JWK import/export as ECMAScript objects, rather than ArrayBuffer
- Re: WebCrypto Security Analysis
- Re: WebCrypto Security Analysis
- Re: WebCrypto Security Analysis
- Re: WebCrypto Security Analysis
- Re: JWK import/export as ECMAScript objects, rather than ArrayBuffer
- Re: WebCrypto Security Analysis
- Re: WebCrypto Security Analysis
- Re: Last Call ready and some broken links in Editor's Draft
- Re: JWK import/export as ECMAScript objects, rather than ArrayBuffer
- Last Call ready and some broken links in Editor's Draft
- F2F and Workshop on WebCrypto v.Next June 1-4th Silicon Valley
- Priority Feedback items for Last Call?
Thursday, 20 March 2014
Wednesday, 19 March 2014
Thursday, 20 March 2014
- Re: JWK import/export as ECMAScript objects, rather than ArrayBuffer
- Re: JWK import/export as ECMAScript objects, rather than ArrayBuffer
Wednesday, 19 March 2014
Tuesday, 18 March 2014
- Re: HmacKeyAlgorithm missing length?
- Re: HmacKeyAlgorithm missing length?
- Re: HmacKeyAlgorithm missing length?
- Re: HmacKeyAlgorithm missing length?
- HmacKeyAlgorithm missing length?
- [W3C Web Crypto WG] Early alpha announce: PubRules Checker NG
- Re: WebIDL usage for Algorithms
- Re: WebIDL usage for Algorithms
- Re: WebIDL usage for Algorithms
- Re: WebIDL usage for Algorithms
- Re: WebIDL usage for Algorithms
- Re: WebIDL usage for Algorithms
- Re: WebIDL usage for Algorithms
- Re: WebIDL usage for Algorithms
Monday, 17 March 2014
- Re: Hashes, names, and normalization
- W3C Web Crypto WG - status of APIs going to Last Call
- W3C Web Crypto WG - take away from our 10th of March call
- Re: Request from WebRTC
- Re: Request from WebRTC
- Re: Request from WebRTC
- Internal server error and latest draft
- Re: will the key reference available sent via postMessage?
- Re: will the key reference available sent via postMessage?
Friday, 14 March 2014
Thursday, 13 March 2014
- Re: Fwd: WebIDL usage for Algorithms
- Fwd: WebIDL usage for Algorithms
- Re: WebIDL usage for Algorithms
Wednesday, 12 March 2014
- Re: [Bug 24963] Export Key with "jwk" operations should return a JWK, rather than an ArrayBuffer
- W3C Web Crypto WG - a possible F2F meeting in May 2014 in the area bay
- Re: [Bug 24963] Export Key with "jwk" operations should return a JWK, rather than an ArrayBuffer
- Re: [Bug 24963] Export Key with "jwk" operations should return a JWK, rather than an ArrayBuffer
- Re: [Bug 24963] Export Key with "jwk" operations should return a JWK, rather than an ArrayBuffer
- Re: [Bug 24963] Export Key with "jwk" operations should return a JWK, rather than an ArrayBuffer
- Re: JWK import/export as ECMAScript objects, rather than ArrayBuffer
- Re: JWK import/export as ECMAScript objects, rather than ArrayBuffer
- Re: JWK import/export as ECMAScript objects, rather than ArrayBuffer
- JWK import/export as ECMAScript objects, rather than ArrayBuffer
Tuesday, 11 March 2014
- Re: WebIDL usage for Algorithms
- Re: WebIDL usage for Algorithms
- Re: WebIDL usage for Algorithms
- Re: WebIDL usage for Algorithms
- Re: WebIDL usage for Algorithms
- Re: WebIDL usage for Algorithms
- Re: W3C Web Crypto WG - a possible F2F meeting in May 2014 in the area bay
- RE: W3C Web Crypto WG - a possible F2F meeting in May 2014 in the area bay
- Re: W3C Web Crypto WG - a possible F2F meeting in May 2014 in the area bay
- W3C Web Crypto WG - a possible F2F meeting in May 2014 in the area bay
- W3C Web Crypto WG - a possible F2F meeting in May 2014 in the area bay
- Re: WebIDL usage for Algorithms
- Re: WebIDL usage for Algorithms
- Re: WebIDL usage for Algorithms
Monday, 10 March 2014
- Re: WebIDL usage for Algorithms
- Re: WebIDL usage for Algorithms
- WebIDL usage for Algorithms
- RE: Comments on RSA-PSS - March 7 Editors Draft
- W3C Web Crypto WG - minutes of 10th of March conf call (includes discussion to go for last call)
- Re: Comments on RSA-PSS - March 7 Editors Draft
- RE: Comments on RSA-PSS - March 7 Editors Draft
- Minor editorial nit
Saturday, 8 March 2014
- RE: Comments on RSA-PSS - March 7 Editors Draft
- RE: Comments on RSA-PSS - March 7 Editors Draft
- RE: Comments on RSA-PSS - March 7 Editors Draft
- Re: [Bug 24963] Export Key with "jwk" operations should return a JWK, rather than an ArrayBuffer
- RE: Comments on RSA-PSS - March 7 Editors Draft
- RE: Comments on RSA-PSS - March 7 Editors Draft
- Re: [Bug 24963] Export Key with "jwk" operations should return a JWK, rather than an ArrayBuffer
- Re: Elliptic Curve key definitions in X9.62 and X9.63
- RE: Elliptic Curve key definitions in X9.62 and X9.63
Friday, 7 March 2014
- Re: WorkerCrypto interface concerns from Microsoft
- Re: Comments on RSA-PSS - March 7 Editors Draft
- Re: Comments on RSA-PSS - March 7 Editors Draft
- Re: Comments on RSA-PSS - March 7 Editors Draft
- Comments on March 7 Editors Draft
- Comments on RSA-PSS - March 7 Editors Draft
- Re: Comments Section RSA-SSA - March 7 draft
- Comments Section RSA-SSA - March 7 draft
- WebCrypto specification status
- Re: [Bug 24963] Export Key with "jwk" operations should return a JWK, rather than an ArrayBuffer
- Re: [Bug 24963] Export Key with "jwk" operations should return a JWK, rather than an ArrayBuffer
- Re: [Bug 24963] Export Key with "jwk" operations should return a JWK, rather than an ArrayBuffer
- Re: [Bug 24963] Export Key with "jwk" operations should return a JWK, rather than an ArrayBuffer
- Re: [Bug 24963] Export Key with "jwk" operations should return a JWK, rather than an ArrayBuffer
- Fwd: [Bug 24963] Export Key with "jwk" operations should return a JWK, rather than an ArrayBuffer
- Re: Errors: throw vs return
- Re: Errors: throw vs return
- Re: Promise return types
- RE: Promise return types
- RE: Promise return types
Thursday, 6 March 2014
- Re: Promise return types
- Re: Promise return types
- Re: WebCrypto Spec Error Types feedback from MS
- RE: Promise return types
- Re: Promise return types
- Promise return types
- RE: PBKDF2 questions
Wednesday, 5 March 2014
- Errors: throw vs return
- Re: PBKDF2 questions
- RE: PBKDF2 questions
- Re: Bug 24457 - AES-KW can only wrap a JWK key if its serialization happens to be 8*n bytes long
- Re: WebCrypto Spec Error Types feedback from MS
- Re: PBKDF2 questions
- Re: PBKDF2 questions
- Re: PBKDF2 questions
- Editorial / style bugs
- Re: PBKDF2 questions
- Re: PBKDF2 questions
- RE: PBKDF2 questions
- PBKDF2 questions
- Re: WebCrypto Spec Error Types feedback from MS
- Bug 24941 - derivedKeyType in deriveKey method should not be nullable
- Daylight Saving Time change – first half of 2014
- W3C Web Crypto WG - agenda for 10th of March regular call (includes decision to go for Last Call)
- RE: WebCrypto Spec Error Types feedback from MS
- Re: Bug 23159 - Inconsistent "length" property when generating keys (bits vs bytes)
- Re: Bug 23159 - Inconsistent "length" property when generating keys (bits vs bytes)
- Re: WebCrypto Spec Error Types feedback from MS
- Hilarious Blog post on WebCrypto
- WebCrypto Spec Error Types feedback from MS
- Re: Specification updates
- Elliptic Curve key definitions in X9.62 and X9.63
- structured cloning of key object and control
Tuesday, 4 March 2014
- Re: Minutes of March 4th Meeting
- Minutes of March 4th Meeting
- W3C Web Crypto WG - take away from Q&A to editors call on 3rd of march
- Re: Bug 23159 - Inconsistent "length" property when generating keys (bits vs bytes)
- Re: Bug 24878 - Remove algorithm aliases
- Re: Bug 23159 - Inconsistent "length" property when generating keys (bits vs bytes)
Monday, 3 March 2014
- Re: Bug 23159 - Inconsistent "length" property when generating keys (bits vs bytes)
- RE: W3C Web Crypto WG - progressing on ISSUE-36
- Re: Bug 24806 - Should the spec mandate a minimum key length for HMAC?
- Re: Bug 24457 - AES-KW can only wrap a JWK key if its serialization happens to be 8*n bytes long
- Bug 23159 - Inconsistent "length" property when generating keys (bits vs bytes)
- IETF and uneven wifi
- RE: Propigation of non exportability in DH
- Re: Specification updates
- RE: inconsistent references for HKDF-CTR
- Re: Consider whether the others Public Value input to (EC)DH deriveKey should be a Key object
Sunday, 2 March 2014
- Re: Bug 24457 - AES-KW can only wrap a JWK key if its serialization happens to be 8*n bytes long
- Re: Propigation of non exportability in DH
- Re: Bug 24878 - Remove algorithm aliases
Saturday, 1 March 2014
- Re: Bug 24878 - Remove algorithm aliases
- Re: Bug 24878 - Remove algorithm aliases
- Re: Bug 24878 - Remove algorithm aliases
- RE: How long is ZZ?
- RE: How long is ZZ?
- Re: Propigation of non exportability in DH
- Re: How long is ZZ?
- How long is ZZ?
- Propigation of non exportability in DH
- Re: Bug 24813 - Decide whether methods should return DOMError or null on failure
- Re: Bug 24878 - Remove algorithm aliases
- Bug 24878 - Remove algorithm aliases
- Re: Bug 23833 - Remove sequence IDL keyword from parameters that take CryptoOperationData