No, as I wrote, other lists feedback is useless. Please, answer the question. Le 28/03/2014 00:06, Richard Barnes a écrit : > This is really not the list for this discussion. Please take it to > webappsec if you want to continue. > > > On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 6:36 PM, Aymeric Vitte <vitteaymeric@gmail.com > <mailto:vitteaymeric@gmail.com>> wrote: > > > Le 27/03/2014 22:01, Ryan Sleevi a écrit : > > Sure, and on Chrome, we're changing this behaviour to match > Firefox (we found multiple compatibility issues each time we > tried - I'm surprised Firefox/IE did not, but they already > treat ws:// and http XHRs as active mixed content that is > blocked). Although we're far away from the topic at hand. > > What do you mean? If you can not use wss then http with ws is > better than https with ws? That's not possible. > > Regards > > Aymeric > > > -- > Peersm : http://www.peersm.com > node-Tor : https://www.github.com/Ayms/node-Tor > GitHub : https://www.github.com/Ayms > > -- Peersm : http://www.peersm.com node-Tor : https://www.github.com/Ayms/node-Tor GitHub : https://www.github.com/Ayms
Received on Friday, 28 March 2014 00:17:57 UTC