Fwd: [Bug 24963] Export Key with "jwk" operations should return a JWK, rather than an ArrayBuffer

Ryan,

I do not believe we should consider replacing the existing JSON
import/export format with an object representation as proposed. The
serialized JSON format has been stable for some time and aligns with the
other formats which are also serialized objects as would be seen in a wire
protocol.

Introducing a new object representation aligned with JWK is a great idea as
an *additional* format, not a replacement - perhaps for a future version of
the specification.

...Mark

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
Date: Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 4:22 PM
Subject: [Bug 24963] Export Key with "jwk" operations should return a JWK,
rather than an ArrayBuffer
To: watsonm@netflix.com


https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=24963

--- Comment #1 from Ryan Sleevi <sleevi@google.com> ---
Bug filed based on this thread -
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webcrypto/2014Mar/0059.html

Specifically,
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webcrypto/2014Mar/0063.html and
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webcrypto/2014Mar/0064.html

--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.