Re: Bug 23833 - Remove sequence IDL keyword from parameters that take CryptoOperationData

I am very much in favor of this.  I was about to file a new bug; glad I
thought to check first :)

Thanks,
--Richard


On Fri, Feb 28, 2014 at 4:42 PM, Mark Watson <watsonm@netflix.com> wrote:

>
>
>
> On Fri, Feb 28, 2014 at 8:33 AM, Ryan Sleevi <sleevi@google.com> wrote:
>
>> Did I not commit this already?
>>
> It's not done in the current editors draft. I can take this one.
>
> ...Mark
>
>
>
>
>
>
>> If not, we should to do it. Certainly, agreed upon at the F2F and I don't
>> see any reason we'd change that. Blink already adopted it following the F2F
>> On Feb 28, 2014 8:28 AM, "Mark Watson" <watsonm@netflix.com> wrote:
>>
>>> https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=23833
>>>
>>> Does anyone have an opinion on this ?
>>>
>>> On the one hand this is a significant change affecting most of the
>>> methods. On the other hand it was apparently agreed at the last F2F.
>>>
>>> ...Mark
>>>
>>
>