Re: WebIDL usage for Algorithms

On 3/18/14 2:03 AM, Mark Watson wrote:
> I meant algorithm/operation pairs that were unsupported by the
> *specification*, not just by the implementation. For example, trying to
> call "sign" with an algorithm that specifies AES-CTR. You won't even
> find a target dictionary type to which the argument should be converted
> in this case.

Ok, but presumably this then rejects the returned promise or something, 
right?

-Boris

Received on Tuesday, 18 March 2014 06:34:12 UTC