public-webapps-github@w3.org from May 2015 by author

Alex Lu

• Re: [manifest] Define identity of a web app. (#272) (Friday, 1 May)

Alex Russell

• Re: [manifest] Manifest format should support some way of including a splash screen (#9) (Sunday, 24 May)
• Re: [ServiceWorker] Unable to easily distinguish top-level navigations (#673) (Saturday, 23 May)
• Re: [spec-reviews] Navigation Error Logging (#24) (Friday, 22 May)
• Re: [ServiceWorker] ServiceWorker registration fails inside an https-origin IFRAME when the top-level page is not secure (e.g. http or data URI) (#700) (Tuesday, 19 May)
• Re: [manifest] Won't related_application be needed at page load? (#364) (Friday, 8 May)
• Re: [spec-reviews] Strawman spec review for upgrade insecure requests (#54) (Wednesday, 6 May)
• Re: [manifest] Should a manifest unambigiously and authoritively be the app's metadata? (#376) (Friday, 1 May)
• Re: [spec-reviews] CSSOM View document.scrollingElement (#51) (Friday, 1 May)

Alex Yursha

• [dom] Add hint that `event.bubbles` is configurable. (#35) (Tuesday, 12 May)

Alexander Abashkin

• Re: [fetch] Aborting a fetch (#27) (Wednesday, 6 May)
• Re: [fetch] Aborting a fetch (#27) (Wednesday, 6 May)

Alexis Menard

• Re: [manifest] A means to control how long a splash screen should remain on screen. (#372) (Monday, 25 May)

allanjuma

• Re: [manifest] A means to control how long a splash screen should remain on screen. (#372) (Monday, 25 May)
• Re: [manifest] A means to control how long a splash screen should remain on screen. (#372) (Saturday, 9 May)
• Re: [manifest] A means to control how long a splash screen should remain on screen. (#372) (Saturday, 9 May)

Andrea Giammarchi

• Re: [fetch] Aborting a fetch (#27) (Friday, 15 May)
• Re: [fetch] Aborting a fetch (#27) (Friday, 15 May)
• Re: [fetch] Aborting a fetch (#27) (Wednesday, 6 May)

Andrew Betts

• [packaging-on-the-web] Link headers as an alternative? (#26) (Friday, 1 May)

Anne van Kesteren

• Re: [dom] Consider new method: getNodesByType (#37) (Saturday, 30 May)
• Re: [xhr] Remove XMLHttpRequest from ServiceWorkerGlobalScope (#19) (Saturday, 30 May)
• Re: [fetch] response.bodyUsed is an ambiguous name (#57) (Saturday, 30 May)
• Re: [webcomponents] [Shadow]: rename <content> to <slot> (bugzilla: 28561) (#92) (Saturday, 30 May)
• Re: [encoding] Benefits of "Legacy" Encodings – Byte Counter (#4) (Saturday, 23 May)
• Re: [dom] Add [TreatNullAs=EmptyString] to Attr.nodeValue/textContent (#36) (Saturday, 23 May)
• [webcomponents] id -> name (#55) (Friday, 22 May)
• Re: [fetch] CSP Request Header and CORS preflight fetch. (#52) (Monday, 18 May)
• [dom] insert/remove hooks need to be invoked for ancestor changes too (#34) (Saturday, 9 May)
• Re: [fetch] Feed a Response to existing APIs (#49) (Saturday, 9 May)
• Re: [fetch] Feed a Response to existing APIs (#49) (Saturday, 9 May)
• Re: [clipboard-apis] Fix the handling of password fields with the copy and cut actions (#5) (Friday, 8 May)
• Re: [permissions] Why "prompt" instead of "default"? (#25) (Friday, 8 May)
• Re: [dom] Rewrite replaceWith/before/after algorithms (#32) (Friday, 8 May)
• Re: [permissions] Why "prompt" instead of "default"? (#25) (Friday, 8 May)
• Re: [webcomponents] [Shadow DOM] [Bug 27775] Update Element.getDestinationInsertionPoints(), using the 'an unclosed node of' relation'. (644a0fa) (Friday, 8 May)
• Re: [webcomponents] [Shadow DOM] Define the non-symmetric relation, called 'an unclosed tree of', between two node trees. (503e27c) (Friday, 8 May)
• Re: [webcomponents] [Shadow DOM] [Bug 27775] Update Element.getDestinationInsertionPoints(), using the 'an unclosed node of' relation'. (644a0fa) (Friday, 8 May)
• Re: [webcomponents] [Shadow DOM] Define the non-symmetric relation, called 'an unclosed tree of', between two node trees. (503e27c) (Friday, 8 May)
• Re: [permissions] Why "prompt" instead of "default"? (#25) (Friday, 8 May)
• Re: [ServiceWorker] add [NewObject] where appropriate (#692) (Thursday, 7 May)
• Re: [permissions] Tackle origin (#34) (Thursday, 7 May)
• Re: [spec-reviews] Strawman spec review for upgrade insecure requests (#54) (Thursday, 7 May)
• Re: [fetch] `user-agent` header control (#37) (Thursday, 7 May)
• Re: [ServiceWorker] Consider producing distinct objects for the same entity to enable garbage collection (#416) (Thursday, 7 May)
• Re: [fetch] PATCH verb (#50) (Thursday, 7 May)
• Re: [fetch] PATCH verb (#50) (Thursday, 7 May)
• Re: [ServiceWorker] Consider producing distinct objects for the same entity to enable garbage collection (#416) (Thursday, 7 May)
• [fetch] Feed a Response to existing APIs (#49) (Thursday, 7 May)
• [fetch] Allow context to be set (#48) (Thursday, 7 May)
• Re: [fetch] Initializing context/content specific fetch defaults (#43) (Thursday, 7 May)
• Re: [dom] Add a common conjugation of "case-sensitive" (#33) (Thursday, 7 May)
• Re: [fullscreen] Make fullscreenElement and fullscreenEnabled [Replaceable]? (#2) (Thursday, 7 May)
• Re: [ServiceWorker] Privacy consideration about the "cache" parameter of the Request object (#585) (Thursday, 7 May)
• Re: [ServiceWorker] Privacy consideration about the "cache" parameter of the Request object (#585) (Thursday, 7 May)
• Re: [permissions] Why "prompt" instead of "default"? (#25) (Thursday, 7 May)
• Re: [push-api] Push event shouldn't be dispatched to an activating worker (#147) (Thursday, 7 May)
• Re: [fetch] Aborting a fetch (#27) (Thursday, 7 May)
• Re: [FileAPI] Use ASCII origin in blob URLs (#7) (Wednesday, 6 May)
• [FileAPI] Use ASCII origin in blob URLs (#7) (Wednesday, 6 May)
• Re: [permissions] Remove global variables (#35) (Wednesday, 6 May)
• [permissions] Remove global variables (#35) (Wednesday, 6 May)
• [permissions] Tackle origin (#34) (Wednesday, 6 May)
• [permissions] Define underlying infrastructure (#33) (Wednesday, 6 May)
• Re: [fetch] Automatically set request's "Content-Type" to "application/json" for POJOs (#47) (Wednesday, 6 May)
• Re: [fetch] Automatically set request's "Content-Type" to "application/json" for POJOs (#47) (Wednesday, 6 May)
• Re: [fetch] Automatically set request's "Content-Type" to "application/json" for POJOs (#47) (Wednesday, 6 May)
• Re: [fetch] Initializing context/content specific fetch defaults (#43) (Wednesday, 6 May)
• Re: [fetch] Automatically set request's "Content-Type" to "application/json" for POJOs (#47) (Wednesday, 6 May)
• Re: [fetch] Added manifest-src directive to request rel. table (#46) (Wednesday, 6 May)
• Re: [fetch] Initializing context/content specific fetch defaults (#43) (Wednesday, 6 May)
• Re: [fetch] Automatically set request's "Content-Type" to "application/json" for POJOs (#47) (Wednesday, 6 May)
• Re: [fetch] Added manifest-src directive to request rel. table (#46) (Wednesday, 6 May)
• Re: [fetch] Added manifest-src directive to request rel. table (1d51c7c) (Tuesday, 5 May)
• Re: [fetch] Add `preload` and `prerender` contexts (#36) (Tuesday, 5 May)
• Re: [fetch] Add support for federated token binding to fetch (#30) (Tuesday, 5 May)
• Re: [fetch] Add `preload` and `prerender` contexts (#36) (Tuesday, 5 May)
• Re: [fetch] Add `preload` and `prerender` contexts (#36) (Tuesday, 5 May)
• [dom] Rewrite replaceWith/before/after algorithms (#32) (Tuesday, 5 May)
• Re: [ServiceWorker] Unable to easily distinguish top-level navigations (#673) (Tuesday, 5 May)
• Re: [permissions] Why "prompt" instead of "default"? (#25) (Tuesday, 5 May)
• Re: [fetch] Initializing context/content specific fetch defaults (#43) (Tuesday, 5 May)
• Re: [permissions] Why "prompt" instead of "default"? (#25) (Tuesday, 5 May)
• Re: [ServiceWorker] allow self-signed certificates (#691) (Monday, 4 May)
• Re: [xhr] Remove extraneous "=" in mail subject (#18) (Monday, 4 May)
• Re: [xhr] Remove extraneous "=" in mail subject (#18) (Monday, 4 May)
• Re: [fetch] Initializing context/content specific fetch defaults (#43) (Monday, 4 May)
• Re: [dom] Attribute lowercasing does not appear to match browsers or web-platform-tests (#31) (Monday, 4 May)
• Re: [dom] cloneNode underspecified for attribute copying (#30) (Saturday, 2 May)
• Re: [webcomponents] Added pure functions idea to the timing alternatives. (#47) (Saturday, 2 May)
• Re: [ServiceWorker] allow self-signed certificates (#691) (Saturday, 2 May)
• Re: [ServiceWorker] allow self-signed certificates (#691) (Saturday, 2 May)
• Re: [push-api] Rename hasPermission (#136) (Friday, 1 May)
• Re: [fetch] Initializing context/content specific fetch defaults (#43) (Friday, 1 May)
• Re: [webcomponents] Make proposals more clear (#45) (Friday, 1 May)
• [webcomponents] Make proposals more clear (#45) (Friday, 1 May)
• Re: [dom] Export all the terms in the spec, and fix a few definitions/autolinks (#29) (Friday, 1 May)

aphillips

• Re: [manifest] i18n: No localization model; [I18N-ISSUE-412] (#338) (Friday, 15 May)

Artem Andreev

• Re: [ServiceWorker] Fallback to App Cache (#697) (Monday, 11 May)
• Re: [ServiceWorker] Fallback to App Cache (#697) (Monday, 11 May)
• [ServiceWorker] Fallback to App Cache (#697) (Friday, 8 May)

Arthur Barstow

• [webstorage] w3c stylesheet needs to be httpS (#2) (Tuesday, 12 May)
• Re: [FileAPI] Use "index.html" as the filename of the spec. (#1) (Wednesday, 6 May)

Arthur Stolyar

• Re: [fetch] Aborting a fetch (#27) (Wednesday, 6 May)

Arun Ranganathan

• Re: [filesystem-api] Observable is not appropriate for directory listing; async iterable would be better (#4) (Friday, 29 May)
• Re: [FileAPI] Use ASCII origin in blob URLs (#7) (Thursday, 7 May)

Austin Cheney

• Re: [dom] Consider new method: getNodesByType (#37) (Thursday, 28 May)
• Re: [dom] Consider new method: getNodesByType (#37) (Thursday, 28 May)
• [dom] Consider new method: getNodesByType (#37) (Tuesday, 26 May)

bashi

• [ServiceWorker] Consider dropping initServiceWorkerMessageEvent() (#701) (Wednesday, 20 May)

Ben Kelly

• Re: [ServiceWorker] Should window.caches be removed (or readonly) for security reasons? (#698) (Saturday, 30 May)
• Re: [ServiceWorker] Should window.caches be removed (or readonly) for security reasons? (#698) (Thursday, 28 May)
• Re: [ServiceWorker] MessageEvent within the SW global should have waitUntil() (#669) (Thursday, 28 May)
• Re: [ServiceWorker] WebRTC and getUserMedia within Service Worker (#670) (Monday, 25 May)
• Re: [ServiceWorker] WebRTC and getUserMedia within Service Worker (#670) (Monday, 25 May)
• Re: [ServiceWorker] WebRTC and getUserMedia within Service Worker (#670) (Monday, 25 May)
• Re: [ServiceWorker] Should window.caches be removed (or readonly) for security reasons? (#698) (Monday, 25 May)
• Re: [ServiceWorker] Should window.caches be removed (or readonly) for security reasons? (#698) (Saturday, 23 May)
• [fetch] Request constructor does not check used flag on null body (#55) (Tuesday, 19 May)
• Re: [ServiceWorker] Replaying POST requests (#693) (Tuesday, 19 May)
• Re: [streams] Add readableStream.locked getter (0c57047) (Tuesday, 19 May)
• Re: [streams] rsReader.readBatch(numberOfChunks)? rbsReader.read(view, { waitUntilDone: true })? (#320) (Friday, 15 May)
• Re: [streams] rsReader.readBatch(numberOfChunks)? rbsReader.read(view, { waitUntilDone: true })? (#320) (Friday, 15 May)
• Re: [fetch] Feed a Response to existing APIs (#49) (Saturday, 9 May)
• Re: [ServiceWorker] Consider producing distinct objects for the same entity to enable garbage collection (#416) (Saturday, 9 May)
• Re: [fetch] Feed a Response to existing APIs (#49) (Saturday, 9 May)
• Re: [ServiceWorker] Replaying POST requests (#693) (Saturday, 9 May)
• Re: [streams] rsReader.readBatch(numberOfChunks)? rbsReader.read(view, { waitUntilDone: true })? (#320) (Saturday, 9 May)
• [ServiceWorker] add [NewObject] where appropriate (#692) (Monday, 4 May)
• Re: [ServiceWorker] MessageEvent within the SW global should have waitUntil() (#669) (Monday, 4 May)
• [ServiceWorker] should SW MessageEvents inherit ExtendableEvent? (#690) (Friday, 1 May)

Benjamin C. Wiley Sittler

• [ServiceWorker] ServiceWorker registration fails inside an https-origin IFRAME when the top-level page is not secure (e.g. http or data URI) (#700) (Tuesday, 19 May)

Benjamin Gruenbaum

• Re: [fetch] Aborting a fetch (#27) (Friday, 15 May)

Boris Zbarsky

• [webidl] Distinguishability of buffers source types needs to be defined better (#50) (Tuesday, 26 May)
• Re: [ServiceWorker] Step 5.4 of openWindow uses the incumbent settings object, which makes no sense (#695) (Tuesday, 19 May)
• [ServiceWorker] about:blank handling in openWindow doesn't make much sense (#696) (Thursday, 7 May)
• [ServiceWorker] Step 5.4 of openWindow uses the incumbent settings object, which makes no sense (#695) (Thursday, 7 May)
• [ServiceWorker] Step 5.3 of openWindow does "exceptions enabled" which doesn't make sense (#694) (Thursday, 7 May)
• Re: [fetch] Automatically set request's "Content-Type" to "application/json" for POJOs (#47) (Wednesday, 6 May)
• Re: [fetch] Automatically set request's "Content-Type" to "application/json" for POJOs (#47) (Wednesday, 6 May)
• Re: [fetch] Automatically set request's "Content-Type" to "application/json" for POJOs (#47) (Wednesday, 6 May)
• Re: [ServiceWorker] self.caches should spec what to do for "untrusted" origins (#687) (Monday, 4 May)
• Re: [dom] Attribute lowercasing does not appear to match browsers or web-platform-tests (#31) (Monday, 4 May)

Brenton Simpson

• Re: [fetch] Automatically set request's "Content-Type" to "application/json" for POJOs (#47) (Thursday, 7 May)
• Re: [fetch] Automatically set request's "Content-Type" to "application/json" for POJOs (#47) (Wednesday, 6 May)
• [fetch] Automatically set request's "Content-Type" to "application/json" for POJOs (#47) (Wednesday, 6 May)

Cameron McCormack

• Re: [ServiceWorker] add [NewObject] where appropriate (#692) (Thursday, 7 May)
• Re: [ServiceWorker] add [NewObject] where appropriate (#692) (Thursday, 7 May)

Cristian Talau

• Re: [editing] What browser internals can be exposed to help us move the caret in (and against) the block direction? (#56) (Sunday, 31 May)
• Re: [editing] What browser internals can be exposed to help us move the caret in (and against) the block direction? (#56) (Sunday, 31 May)
• Re: [editing] What browser internals can be exposed to help us move the caret in (and against) the block direction? (#56) (Saturday, 30 May)
• Re: [editing] What browser internals can be exposed to help us move the caret in (and against) the block direction? (#56) (Saturday, 30 May)
• Re: [editing] What intentions do we need? (#52) (Saturday, 30 May)
• Re: [editing] What intentions do we need? (#52) (Friday, 29 May)
• Re: [editing] What intentions do we need? (#52) (Friday, 29 May)
• Re: [editing-explainer] What browser internals can be exposed to help us move the caret in (and against) the block direction? (#56) (Friday, 29 May)
• Re: [editing-explainer] What intentions do we need? (#52) (Thursday, 28 May)
• Re: [editing-explainer] What browser internals can be exposed to help us move the caret in (and against) the block direction? (#56) (Thursday, 28 May)
• Re: [editing-explainer] What browser internals can be exposed to help us move the caret in (and against) the block direction? (#56) (Thursday, 28 May)
• Re: [editing-explainer] What browser internals can be exposed to help us move the caret in (and against) the block direction? (#56) (Thursday, 28 May)
• Re: [editing-explainer] What intentions do we need? (#52) (Thursday, 28 May)

Daniel Appelquist

• Re: [spec-reviews] CSS Font Loading (#20) (Friday, 22 May)
• Re: [spec-reviews] CSS Font Loading (#20) (Friday, 22 May)
• Re: [spec-reviews] Browser Fingerprinting Document (#38) (Wednesday, 20 May)
• Re: [spec-reviews] Credential Management API (#49) (Wednesday, 20 May)
• Re: [spec-reviews] Credential Management API (#49) (Wednesday, 20 May)
• Re: [spec-reviews] CSV on the Web (#55) (Wednesday, 20 May)

Daniel Cheng

• [clipboard-apis] Behavior of queryCommandEnabled (#7) (Tuesday, 19 May)

David Graham

• Re: [fetch] Automatically set request's "Content-Type" to "application/json" for POJOs (#47) (Thursday, 7 May)

Diego Perini

• Re: [spec-reviews] CSSOM View document.scrollingElement (#51) (Sunday, 3 May)

Dimitri Glazkov

• Re: [webcomponents] [Shadow]: rename <content> to <slot> (bugzilla: 28561) (#92) (Sunday, 31 May)
• [webcomponents] Added a couple of algorithms and definitions. (#53) (Thursday, 21 May)
• [webcomponents] Stubbed out Slots proposal. (#52) (Tuesday, 19 May)
• [webcomponents] Timing experiment (#51) (Tuesday, 12 May)
• [webcomponents] Started on partial redistributions analysis. (#50) (Wednesday, 6 May)
• Re: [webcomponents] Update Imperative-API-for-Node-Distribution-in-Shadow-DOM.md (#49) (Tuesday, 5 May)
• Re: [webcomponents] Update Imperative-API-for-Node-Distribution-in-Shadow-DOM.md (#49) (Tuesday, 5 May)
• Re: [webcomponents] Added fastdom callback idea. (#48) (Friday, 1 May)
• [webcomponents] Added fastdom callback idea. (#48) (Friday, 1 May)
• Re: [webcomponents] Added pure functions idea to the timing alternatives. (#47) (Friday, 1 May)
• Re: [webcomponents] Added pure functions idea to the timing alternatives. (#47) (Friday, 1 May)
• [webcomponents] Added pure functions idea to the timing alternatives. (#47) (Friday, 1 May)
• Re: [webcomponents] Add https://gist.github.com/rniwa/2f14588926e1a11c65d3 to proposals. (#44) (Friday, 1 May)

Dmitry Korobkin

• Re: [fetch] Aborting a fetch (#27) (Wednesday, 6 May)

Domenic Denicola

• Re: [filesystem-api] Observable is not appropriate for directory listing; async iterable would be better (#4) (Saturday, 30 May)
• Re: [filesystem-api] Observable is not appropriate for directory listing; async iterable would be better (#4) (Saturday, 30 May)
• Re: [filesystem-api] Observable is not appropriate for directory listing; async iterable would be better (#4) (Friday, 29 May)
• [filesystem-api] Observable is not appropriate for directory listing; async iterable would be better (#4) (Friday, 29 May)
• Re: [streams] Readable byte streams should support an internal queue (#353) (Thursday, 28 May)
• Re: [ServiceWorker] Should window.caches be removed (or readonly) for security reasons? (#698) (Thursday, 28 May)
• Re: [ServiceWorker] Should window.caches be removed (or readonly) for security reasons? (#698) (Thursday, 28 May)
• Re: [ServiceWorker] Should window.caches be removed (or readonly) for security reasons? (#698) (Thursday, 28 May)
• Re: [ServiceWorker] Should window.caches be removed (or readonly) for security reasons? (#698) (Monday, 25 May)
• Re: [spec-reviews] CSS Font Loading (#20) (Friday, 22 May)
• Re: [spec-reviews] CSS Font Loading (#20) (Thursday, 21 May)
• Re: [spec-reviews] CSS Font Loading (#20) (Thursday, 21 May)
• Re: [ServiceWorker] Consider dropping initServiceWorkerMessageEvent() (#701) (Wednesday, 20 May)
• Re: [ServiceWorker] Step 5.3 of openWindow does "exceptions enabled" which doesn't make sense (#694) (Tuesday, 19 May)
• Re: [streams] Add readableStream.locked getter (#357) (Tuesday, 19 May)
• Re: [streams] Add readableStream.locked getter (0c57047) (Tuesday, 19 May)
• Re: [streams] Readable byte streams should support an internal queue (#353) (Tuesday, 19 May)
• [streams] Add readableStream.locked getter (#357) (Monday, 18 May)
• Re: [streams] rsReader.readBatch(numberOfChunks)? rbsReader.read(view, { waitUntilDone: true })? (#320) (Monday, 18 May)
• Re: [streams] rsReader.readBatch(numberOfChunks)? rbsReader.read(view, { waitUntilDone: true })? (#320) (Monday, 18 May)
• Re: [streams] Added some more readable stream tests (#315) (Tuesday, 12 May)
• Re: [streams] Added some more readable stream tests (#315) (Tuesday, 12 May)
• Re: [streams] rsReader.readBatch(numberOfChunks)? rbsReader.read(view, { waitUntilDone: true })? (#320) (Friday, 8 May)
• Re: [ServiceWorker] add [NewObject] where appropriate (#692) (Thursday, 7 May)
• Re: [streams] Readable byte streams should support an internal queue (#353) (Thursday, 7 May)
• Re: [streams] Support reading bytes into buffers allocated by user code on platforms where only async read is available (#253) (Thursday, 7 May)
• Re: [fetch] Feed a Response to existing APIs (#49) (Thursday, 7 May)
• Re: [streams] Make the context be the transform object when calling transform and flush (#356) (Wednesday, 6 May)
• Re: [streams] Make the context be the transform object when calling transform and flush (#356) (Wednesday, 6 May)
• Re: [streams] Make the context be the transform object when calling transform and flush (#356) (Wednesday, 6 May)
• Re: [streams] Make the context be the transform object when calling transform and flush (#356) (Wednesday, 6 May)
• Re: [streams] Make the context be the transform object when calling transform and flush (#356) (Wednesday, 6 May)
• Re: [streams] Make the context be the transform object when calling transform and flush (#356) (Wednesday, 6 May)
• Re: [streams] Make the context be the transform object when calling transform and flush (#356) (Wednesday, 6 May)
• Re: [fetch] Automatically set request's "Content-Type" to "application/json" for POJOs (#47) (Wednesday, 6 May)
• Re: [fetch] Automatically set request's "Content-Type" to "application/json" for POJOs (#47) (Wednesday, 6 May)
• Re: [fetch] Automatically set request's "Content-Type" to "application/json" for POJOs (#47) (Wednesday, 6 May)
• Re: [fetch] Added manifest-src directive to request rel. table (#46) (Wednesday, 6 May)
• Re: [fetch] Automatically set request's "Content-Type" to "application/json" for POJOs (#47) (Wednesday, 6 May)
• Re: [streams] WritableStream constructor: strategy should be set before sync with queue (#346) (Sunday, 3 May)
• Re: [streams] Non-normative descriptions are missing for ReadableStreamController (#350) (Sunday, 3 May)
• [streams] ReadableByteStream needs reference implementation/tests (#355) (Sunday, 3 May)
• [streams] ReadableByteStream underlying source/controller design: return a promise vs. c.something (#354) (Sunday, 3 May)
• [streams] Readable byte streams should support an internal queue (#353) (Sunday, 3 May)
• Re: [streams] Add ReadableByteStream definition (#343) (Sunday, 3 May)
• Re: [streams] Add ReadableByteStream definition (#343) (Sunday, 3 May)
• Re: [streams] Update byte stream spec (#351) (Sunday, 3 May)
• Re: [streams] Update byte stream spec (#351) (Sunday, 3 May)
• Re: [dom] Attribute lowercasing does not appear to match browsers or web-platform-tests (#31) (Sunday, 3 May)
• [dom] Attribute lowercasing does not appear to match browsers or web-platform-tests (#31) (Sunday, 3 May)
• Re: [dom] cloneNode underspecified for attribute copying (#30) (Saturday, 2 May)
• [dom] cloneNode underspecified for attribute copying (#30) (Friday, 1 May)
• Re: [streams] Add SNAPSHOT-LINK argument to the bikeshed command line in README.md (#348) (Friday, 1 May)
• Re: [dom] Several references are now wrong after Bikeshed conversion (#17) (Friday, 1 May)
• Re: [streams] Add ReadableByteStream definition (#343) (Friday, 1 May)
• Re: [streams] Add ReadableByteStream definition (#343) (Friday, 1 May)
• Re: [streams] Remove closedPromise from ReadableStream's internal slot list (#352) (Friday, 1 May)

Dominique Hazael-Massieux

• [spec-reviews] Media Capture and Streams (#57) (Wednesday, 6 May)

Duan Yao

• Re: [fetch] XHR option to trigger busy indicators (#19) (Friday, 15 May)
• Re: [fetch] XHR option to trigger busy indicators (#19) (Friday, 15 May)
• Re: [fetch] XHR option to trigger busy indicators (#19) (Friday, 15 May)
• Re: [fetch] XHR option to trigger busy indicators (#19) (Friday, 15 May)
• Re: [fetch] XHR option to trigger busy indicators (#19) (Friday, 15 May)
• Re: [fetch] XHR option to trigger busy indicators (#19) (Friday, 15 May)
• Re: [fetch] XHR option to trigger busy indicators (#19) (Wednesday, 13 May)
• Re: [fetch] XHR option to trigger busy indicators (#19) (Wednesday, 13 May)

Ed Hager

• Re: [streams] Make the context be the transform object when calling transform and flush (#356) (Wednesday, 6 May)
• [streams] Make the context be the transform object when calling transform and flush (#356) (Wednesday, 6 May)

Ehsan Akhgari

• Re: [clipboard-apis] Fix the handling of password fields with the copy and cut actions (#5) (Friday, 8 May)
• [clipboard-apis] Fix the handling of the default cut action when we're not in an editable context (#6) (Friday, 8 May)
• [clipboard-apis] Fix the handling of password fields with the copy and cut actions (#5) (Friday, 8 May)

Feross Aboukhadijeh

• Re: [ServiceWorker] WebRTC and getUserMedia within Service Worker (#670) (Monday, 25 May)
• Re: [ServiceWorker] WebRTC and getUserMedia within Service Worker (#670) (Monday, 25 May)
• Re: [ServiceWorker] WebRTC and getUserMedia within Service Worker (#670) (Monday, 25 May)
• Re: [ServiceWorker] WebRTC and getUserMedia within Service Worker (#670) (Monday, 25 May)

Florian Rivoal

• Re: [editing-explainer] ContentEditable with UserSelect=None needs to be documented (#20) (Tuesday, 26 May)
• Re: [editing-explainer] ContentEditable with UserSelect=None needs to be documented (#20) (Tuesday, 26 May)
• Re: [editing-explainer] ContentEditable with UserSelect=None needs to be documented (#20) (Tuesday, 26 May)
• Re: [editing-explainer] ContentEditable with UserSelect=None needs to be documented (#20) (Tuesday, 26 May)

François REMY

• Re: [manifest] A means to control how long a splash screen should remain on screen. (#372) (Tuesday, 26 May)

Frederico Caldeira Knabben

• Re: [editing-explainer] What to do with execCommand? (#53) (Thursday, 28 May)
• Re: [editing-explainer] define relation to HTML Editing APIs (#48) (Tuesday, 19 May)
• Re: [editing-explainer] define relation to HTML Editing APIs (#48) (Tuesday, 19 May)

Hallvord R. M. Steen

• [clipboard-apis] What should happen when copying content with a CANVAS tag in?` (#8) (Saturday, 30 May)
• Re: [xhr] Abandon hope of removing sync XHR from the web platform? (#20) (Friday, 29 May)
• Re: [editing-explainer] What intentions do we need? (#52) (Thursday, 28 May)
• Re: [editing-explainer] spell checking should be able to span multiple Typing Nodes (#50) (Thursday, 28 May)
• Re: [editing-explainer] What intentions do we need? (#52) (Thursday, 28 May)
• Re: [clipboard-apis] Behavior of queryCommandEnabled (#7) (Tuesday, 19 May)
• Re: [editing-explainer] execCommand has now been spec'd to trigger a "User Intent" for cut/copy/paste (#47) (Tuesday, 19 May)
• [clipboard-apis] Should queryCommandEnabled(cut|copy|paste) trigger onbefore* events? (#4) (Friday, 8 May)

Hayato Ito

• Re: [webcomponents] [Shadow]: rename <content> to <slot> (bugzilla: 28561) (#92) (Saturday, 30 May)
• Re: [webcomponents] [Shadow]: rename <content> to <slot> (bugzilla: 28561) (#92) (Friday, 29 May)
• Re: [webcomponents] Describe focus navigation order for the case with tabindex=-1 (#35) (Friday, 29 May)
• Re: [webcomponents] Change the order of insertion points which are involved in a re-distribution in event path (W3C bug 23887) (#42) (Friday, 29 May)
• Re: [webcomponents] Change the order of insertion points which are involved in a re-distribution in event path (W3C bug 23887) (#42) (Friday, 29 May)
• Re: [webcomponents] [Shadow]: Focus navigation in distributed content (#103) (Friday, 29 May)
• Re: [webcomponents] [Shadow]: Focus navigation in distributed content (#103) (Friday, 29 May)
• Re: [webcomponents] [Shadow]: The return type of Event.path should leverage WebIDL sequences (bugzilla: 25458) (#101) (Friday, 29 May)
• Re: [webcomponents] [Shadow]: Shadow DOM V2 (bugzilla: 15480) (#58) (Friday, 29 May)
• Re: [webcomponents] [Shadow]: Shadow DOM V2 (bugzilla: 15480) (#58) (Friday, 29 May)
• Re: [webcomponents] [Shadow]: Shadow DOM v1 (bugzilla: 28552) (#75) (Friday, 29 May)
• Re: [webcomponents] [Shadow]: Shadow DOM v1 (bugzilla: 28552) (#75) (Friday, 29 May)
• Re: [webcomponents] [Shadow]: rename <content> to <slot> (bugzilla: 28561) (#92) (Friday, 29 May)
• Re: [webcomponents] [Shadow]: Focus navigation in distributed content (#103) (Thursday, 28 May)
• Re: [webcomponents] [Shadow]: Focus navigation in distributed content (#103) (Thursday, 28 May)
• [webcomponents] [Shadow] Change the order of insertion points which are involved in a re-distribution in event path (bugzilla: 23887) (#98) (Monday, 25 May)
• [webcomponents] [Shadow]: The return type of Event.path should leverage WebIDL sequences (bugzilla: 25458) (#101) (Monday, 25 May)
• [webcomponents] [Shadow]: Add "closed" flag to createShadowRoot (bugzilla: 20144) (#100) (Monday, 25 May)
• [webcomponents] [Shadow]: Consider a notion of shared stylesheet (bugzilla: 15818) (#99) (Monday, 25 May)
• [webcomponents] [Shadow]: Element.createShadowRoot() throws an exception for some elements (bugzilla: 27844) (#102) (Monday, 25 May)
• [webcomponents] [Shadow]: how is the autofocus attribute supposed to be handled? (bugzilla: 27757) (#97) (Monday, 25 May)
• [webcomponents] [Shadow]: Consider explicitly exporting CSS Variables across a shadow boundary (bugzilla: 17143) (#94) (Monday, 25 May)
• [webcomponents] [Shadow]: rename <content> to <slot> (bugzilla: 28561) (#92) (Monday, 25 May)
• [webcomponents] [Shadow]: <content> usage in a place where non-flow content is expected (bugzilla: 22107) (#95) (Monday, 25 May)
• [webcomponents] [Shadow]: Make event retargeting optional (bugzilla: 28444) (#89) (Monday, 25 May)
• [webcomponents] [Shadow]: There's isn't a way to append shadow elements in SVG (bugzilla: 24181) (#96) (Monday, 25 May)
• [webcomponents] [Shadow]: Inheritance Model for Shadow DOM (bugzilla: 28587) (#93) (Monday, 25 May)
• [webcomponents] [Shadow]: Define the behavior of *closed* shadow trees. (bugzilla: 27775) (#85) (Monday, 25 May)
• [webcomponents] [Shadow]: Shadow host with tabindex=-1, all descendent tree should be ignored for tab navigation (bugzilla: 27965) (#86) (Monday, 25 May)
• [webcomponents] [Shadow]: Have a common interface between Document and ShadowRoot (bugzilla: 28493) (#91) (Monday, 25 May)
• [webcomponents] [Shadow]: Consider removal of multiple shadow roots (bugzilla: 28446) (#90) (Monday, 25 May)
• [webcomponents] [Shadow]: Multiple trees are introduced to explain encapsulation. (bugzilla: 23481) (#83) (Monday, 25 May)
• [webcomponents] [Shadow]: inappropriate reference to CSS3-UI nav-index spec in focus navigation order (bugzilla: 28079) (#88) (Monday, 25 May)
• [webcomponents] [Shadow]: Distribution needs to not be observable (bugzilla: 27994) (#87) (Monday, 25 May)
• [webcomponents] [Shadow]: Need mechanism to tell if an element in a ShadowRoot has been inserted into the Document (bugzilla: 22141) (#81) (Monday, 25 May)
• [webcomponents] [Shadow]: Figure out a good replacement for /deep/ in testing scenarios (bugzilla: 28591) (#78) (Monday, 25 May)
• [webcomponents] [Shadow]: Each section on the spec needs examples (bugzilla: 24639) (#84) (Monday, 25 May)
• [webcomponents] [Shadow]: Add support for external stylesheets using link rel="stylesheet" (bugzilla: 22539) (#82) (Monday, 25 May)
• [webcomponents] [Shadow]: Node should expose their scope so that shared state can be scoped to components. (bugzilla: 22080) (#80) (Monday, 25 May)
• [webcomponents] [Shadow]: Find a way for selection to work across shadow DOM subtrees (bugzilla: 15444) (#79) (Monday, 25 May)
• [webcomponents] [Shadow]: Event model (bugzilla: 28564) (#77) (Monday, 25 May)
• [webcomponents] [Shadow]: Consider not using AT_TARGET more than once in the event path (bugzilla: 26892) (#68) (Monday, 25 May)
• [webcomponents] [Shadow]: Specify distribution in terms of event loop (bugzilla: 28443) (#73) (Monday, 25 May)
• [webcomponents] [Shadow] investigate if there should be deepRelatedTargets and touch.deepTargets (bugzilla: 28560) (#76) (Monday, 25 May)
• [webcomponents] [Shadow]: Shadow DOM v1 (bugzilla: 28552) (#75) (Monday, 25 May)
• [webcomponents] [Shadow]: Add [TreatNullAs=EmptyString] to ShadowRoot.innerHTML (bugzilla: 28549) (#74) (Monday, 25 May)
• [webcomponents] [Shadow]: Declarative Shadow DOM (bugzilla: 28441) (#71) (Monday, 25 May)
• [webcomponents] [Shadow]: Isolated Shadow trees (bugzilla: 28442) (#72) (Monday, 25 May)
• [webcomponents] [Shadow]: Fully explore composition (bugzilla: 27401) (#69) (Monday, 25 May)
• [webcomponents] [Shadow]: elementFromPoint should return the host when you hit a Text node (bugzilla: 24638) (#67) (Monday, 25 May)
• [webcomponents] [Shadow]: Need to define what .styleSheets actually does on a shadow root (bugzilla: 27418) (#70) (Monday, 25 May)
• [webcomponents] [Shadow]: url fragment identifiers should be followed into ShadowDOM (bugzilla: 23161) (#66) (Monday, 25 May)
• [webcomponents] [Shadow]: Shadow DOM-based components could benefit from a way to detect when light DOM contents change (bugzilla: 21149) (#62) (Monday, 25 May)
• [webcomponents] [Shadow]: Need an equivalent definition of 'in a Document' for shadow trees (bugzilla: 26365) (#57) (Monday, 25 May)
• [webcomponents] [Shadow]: Form elements crossing shadow boundary (bugzilla: 22443) (#65) (Monday, 25 May)
• [webcomponents] [Shadow]: Consider a <content> selector for "nodes not otherwise distributed" (bugzilla: 22268) (#64) (Monday, 25 May)
• [webcomponents] [Shadow]: Shadow trees should somehow contain base URL information (bugzilla: 22255) (#63) (Monday, 25 May)
• [webcomponents] [Shadow]: Consider augmenting HTML parser to parse <shadow> and <content> just like <template> (bugzilla: 15616) (#59) (Monday, 25 May)
• [webcomponents] [Shadow]: Update constraints around stopping events (bugzilla: 20247) (#61) (Monday, 25 May)
• [webcomponents] [Shadow]: Specify imperative API for node distribution (bugzilla: 18429) (#60) (Monday, 25 May)
• [webcomponents] [Shadow]: Shadow DOM V2 (bugzilla: 15480) (#58) (Monday, 25 May)
• [webcomponents] [Shadow]: Style element should specify when to create and add style sheet in shadow DOM (bugzilla: 26850) (#56) (Monday, 25 May)
• Re: [webcomponents] id -> name (#55) (Friday, 22 May)
• Re: [webcomponents] id -> name (#55) (Friday, 22 May)
• Re: [webcomponents] Typo ;) (#54) (Friday, 22 May)
• Re: [webcomponents] Added a couple of algorithms and definitions. (#53) (Friday, 22 May)
• Re: [webcomponents] Added a couple of algorithms and definitions. (#53) (Friday, 22 May)
• Re: [webcomponents] Added a couple of algorithms and definitions. (#53) (Friday, 22 May)
• Re: [webcomponents] [Shadow DOM] Define the non-symmetric relation, called 'an unclosed tree of', between two node trees. (503e27c) (Friday, 8 May)
• Re: [webcomponents] [Shadow DOM] [Bug 27775] Update Element.getDestinationInsertionPoints(), using the 'an unclosed node of' relation'. (644a0fa) (Friday, 8 May)
• Re: [webcomponents] [Shadow DOM] Define the non-symmetric relation, called 'an unclosed tree of', between two node trees. (503e27c) (Friday, 8 May)
• Re: [webcomponents] Fix the table-chart example (#46) (Friday, 1 May)

Honza Bambas

• Re: [fetch] Cache state: partial content (#38) (Wednesday, 20 May)

Ilya Grigorik

• Re: [spec-reviews] Navigation Error Logging (#24) (Tuesday, 26 May)
• Re: [fetch] Abort fetch upon document unload (#53) (Friday, 15 May)
• Re: [fetch] Access to the HTTP trailer (#34) (Thursday, 14 May)
• Re: [fetch] Say something rather vague about priority to at least acknowledge it exists. Fixes the remainder of #43. (600ccb7) (Thursday, 7 May)
• Re: [fetch] Initializing context/content specific fetch defaults (#43) (Thursday, 7 May)
• Re: [fetch] Initializing context/content specific fetch defaults (#43) (Wednesday, 6 May)
• Re: [fetch] Initializing context/content specific fetch defaults (#43) (Tuesday, 5 May)
• Re: [fetch] Add `preload` and `prerender` contexts (#36) (Tuesday, 5 May)
• Re: [fetch] Add `preload` and `prerender` contexts (#36) (Tuesday, 5 May)
• Re: [fetch] Initializing context/content specific fetch defaults (#43) (Monday, 4 May)
• Re: [fetch] Initializing context/content specific fetch defaults (#43) (Friday, 1 May)

István Szmozsánszky

• Re: [ServiceWorker] There should be no such thing as "fail to activate" (#659) (Sunday, 17 May)
• Re: [ServiceWorker] allow self-signed certificates (#691) (Sunday, 3 May)

Jafar Husain

• Re: [filesystem-api] Observable is not appropriate for directory listing; async iterable would be better (#4) (Saturday, 30 May)
• Re: [filesystem-api] Observable is not appropriate for directory listing; async iterable would be better (#4) (Saturday, 30 May)

Jake Archibald

• Re: [ServiceWorker] Define the lifetime of a blob URL created inside a service worker (#688) (Wednesday, 27 May)
• Re: [ServiceWorker] Should window.caches be removed (or readonly) for security reasons? (#698) (Wednesday, 27 May)
• Re: [ServiceWorker] Should window.caches be removed (or readonly) for security reasons? (#698) (Wednesday, 27 May)
• Re: [ServiceWorker] Should window.caches be removed (or readonly) for security reasons? (#698) (Wednesday, 27 May)
• [ServiceWorker] How to deal with cookie bombing (#704) (Wednesday, 27 May)
• [ServiceWorker] Receivers of ranged responses must ensure all ranges come from the same underlying resource (#703) (Wednesday, 27 May)
• Re: [ServiceWorker] Should window.caches be removed (or readonly) for security reasons? (#698) (Sunday, 24 May)
• Re: [ServiceWorker] Should window.caches be removed (or readonly) for security reasons? (#698) (Friday, 22 May)
• Re: [ServiceWorker] Should window.caches be removed (or readonly) for security reasons? (#698) (Friday, 22 May)
• Re: [ServiceWorker] Cache API shouldn't be available outside the service workers (#702) (Friday, 22 May)
• Re: [ServiceWorker] Cache API shouldn't be available outside the service workers (#702) (Friday, 22 May)
• Re: [ServiceWorker] Step 5.3 of openWindow does "exceptions enabled" which doesn't make sense (#694) (Wednesday, 20 May)
• Re: [ServiceWorker] Step 5.3 of openWindow does "exceptions enabled" which doesn't make sense (#694) (Wednesday, 20 May)
• Re: [ServiceWorker] Navigating clients from the SW context? (#681) (Wednesday, 20 May)
• Re: [ServiceWorker] Navigating clients from the SW context? (#681) (Tuesday, 19 May)
• Re: [ServiceWorker] Step 5.3 of openWindow does "exceptions enabled" which doesn't make sense (#694) (Tuesday, 19 May)
• Re: [ServiceWorker] A header/something to kill SWs (#614) (Tuesday, 19 May)
• Re: [ServiceWorker] Navigating clients from the SW context? (#681) (Tuesday, 19 May)
• Re: [ServiceWorker] Unable to easily distinguish top-level navigations (#673) (Tuesday, 19 May)
• Re: [ServiceWorker] MessageEvent within the SW global should have waitUntil() (#669) (Tuesday, 19 May)
• Re: [ServiceWorker] How are unloaded tabs represented? (#626) (Tuesday, 19 May)
• Re: [ServiceWorker] Replaying POST requests (#693) (Tuesday, 19 May)
• Re: [ServiceWorker] ServiceWorker registration fails inside an https-origin IFRAME when the top-level page is not secure (e.g. http or data URI) (#700) (Tuesday, 19 May)
• Re: [ServiceWorker] ServiceWorker registration fails inside an https-origin IFRAME when the top-level page is not secure (e.g. http or data URI) (#700) (Tuesday, 19 May)
• Re: [ServiceWorker] ServiceWorker registration fails inside an https-origin IFRAME when the top-level page is not secure (e.g. http or data URI) (#700) (Tuesday, 19 May)
• Re: [ServiceWorker] Step 5.3 of openWindow does "exceptions enabled" which doesn't make sense (#694) (Tuesday, 19 May)
• Re: [ServiceWorker] navigator.serviceWorker is not defined (#689) (Monday, 18 May)
• Re: [ServiceWorker] Step 5.4 of openWindow uses the incumbent settings object, which makes no sense (#695) (Monday, 18 May)
• Re: [ServiceWorker] Step 5.4 of openWindow uses the incumbent settings object, which makes no sense (#695) (Monday, 18 May)
• [ServiceWorker] Restrict openWindow() to http(s) schemes? (#699) (Monday, 18 May)
• Re: [ServiceWorker] about:blank handling in openWindow doesn't make much sense (#696) (Monday, 18 May)
• Re: [ServiceWorker] under what conditions should sandboxed iframes be intercepted? (#648) (Thursday, 14 May)
• Re: [ServiceWorker] Should window.caches be removed (or readonly) for security reasons? (#698) (Thursday, 14 May)
• Re: [ServiceWorker] Should window.caches be removed (or readonly) for security reasons? (#698) (Thursday, 14 May)
• Re: [ServiceWorker] under what conditions should sandboxed iframes be intercepted? (#648) (Tuesday, 12 May)

James Burke

• Re: [ServiceWorker] Workers & SharedWorkers within ServiceWorkers (#678) (Thursday, 28 May)

jan-ivar

• Re: [fetch] Aborting a fetch (#27) (Friday, 15 May)
• Re: [fetch] Aborting a fetch (#27) (Friday, 15 May)
• Re: [fetch] Aborting a fetch (#27) (Friday, 15 May)
• Re: [fetch] Aborting a fetch (#27) (Friday, 15 May)

Janusz Majnert

• [manifest] Typo fix (#379) (Wednesday, 6 May)
• Re: [manifest] Define identity of a web app. (#272) (Tuesday, 5 May)
• Re: [manifest] Should a manifest unambigiously and authoritively be the app's metadata? (#376) (Friday, 1 May)
• Re: [manifest] Should a manifest unambigiously and authoritively be the app's metadata? (#376) (Friday, 1 May)
• Re: [manifest] Define identity of a web app. (#272) (Friday, 1 May)
• Re: [manifest] Define identity of a web app. (#272) (Friday, 1 May)

Jeff Burtoft

• Re: [manifest] Provide better examples of scope (#380) (Saturday, 16 May)
• Re: [manifest] Provide better examples of scope (#380) (Saturday, 9 May)
• Re: [manifest] Are "hosted apps" in scope? (#340) (Saturday, 9 May)

joeedh

• [FileAPI] Controlling Blob URL's (#8) (Thursday, 28 May)

Joel Weinberger

• Re: [ServiceWorker] under what conditions should sandboxed iframes be intercepted? (#648) (Wednesday, 13 May)
• Re: [ServiceWorker] under what conditions should sandboxed iframes be intercepted? (#648) (Tuesday, 12 May)

Johan Lorenzo

• [fetch] response.bodyUsed is an ambiguous name (#57) (Thursday, 28 May)

Johan Sörlin

• Re: [editing-explainer] replaceText input event could span multiple Typing Nodes (#50) (Tuesday, 26 May)

Johannes Wilm

• Re: [editing] What browser internals can be exposed to help us move the caret in (and against) the block direction? (#56) (Sunday, 31 May)
• Re: [editing] What browser internals can be exposed to help us move the caret in (and against) the block direction? (#56) (Saturday, 30 May)
• Re: [editing] What browser internals can be exposed to help us move the caret in (and against) the block direction? (#56) (Saturday, 30 May)
• Re: [editing] What intentions do we need? (#52) (Saturday, 30 May)
• Re: [editing] What browser internals can be exposed to help us move the caret in (and against) the block direction? (#56) (Saturday, 30 May)
• Re: [editing] What browser internals can be exposed to help us move the caret in (and against) the block direction? (#56) (Saturday, 30 May)
• Re: [editing] What intentions do we need? (#52) (Friday, 29 May)
• Re: [editing] What browser internals can be exposed to help us move the caret in (and against) the block direction? (#56) (Friday, 29 May)
• Re: [editing] What intentions do we need? (#52) (Friday, 29 May)
• Re: [editing] What browser internals can be exposed to help us move the caret in (and against) the block direction? (#56) (Friday, 29 May)
• Re: [editing] What intentions do we need? (#52) (Friday, 29 May)
• Re: [editing-explainer] Can we use textnodes, and block/inline nodes as shadow roots for transparent IME handling? (#57) (Friday, 29 May)
• Re: [editing-explainer] Can we use textnodes, and block/inline nodes as shadow roots for transparent IME handling? (#57) (Thursday, 28 May)
• Re: [editing-explainer] Can we use textnodes, and block/inline nodes as shadow roots for transparent IME handling? (#57) (Thursday, 28 May)
• Re: [editing-explainer] Can we use textnodes, and block/inline nodes as shadow roots for transparent IME handling? (#57) (Thursday, 28 May)
• Re: [editing-explainer] spell checking should be able to span multiple Typing Nodes (#50) (Thursday, 28 May)
• Re: [editing-explainer] What caret positions do we need to allow? (#51) (Thursday, 28 May)
• Re: [editing-explainer] How can sites access browser spellchecking? (#36) (Thursday, 28 May)
• Re: [editing-explainer] What intentions do we need? (#52) (Thursday, 28 May)
• Re: [editing-explainer] What browser internals can be exposed to help us move the caret in (and against) the block direction? (#56) (Thursday, 28 May)
• Re: [editing-explainer] Can we use textnodes, and block/inline nodes as shadow roots for transparent IME handling? (#57) (Thursday, 28 May)
• Re: [editing-explainer] What caret positions do we need to allow? (#51) (Thursday, 28 May)
• Re: [editing-explainer] How can sites access browser spellchecking? (#36) (Thursday, 28 May)
• Re: [editing-explainer] What intentions do we need? (#52) (Thursday, 28 May)
• Re: [editing-explainer] Can we use textnodes, and block/inline nodes as shadow roots for transparent IME handling? (#57) (Thursday, 28 May)
• Re: [editing-explainer] What browser internals can be exposed to help us move the caret in (and against) the block direction? (#56) (Thursday, 28 May)
• Re: [editing-explainer] Can we use textnodes, and block/inline nodes as shadow roots for transparent IME handling? (#57) (Thursday, 28 May)
• [editing-explainer] what intentions do we need? (#52) (Wednesday, 27 May)
• Re: [editing-explainer] What browser internals can be exposed to help us move the caret in (and against) the block direction? (#56) (Thursday, 28 May)
• Re: [editing-explainer] Can we use textnodes, and block/inline nodes as shadow roots for transparent IME handling? (#57) (Thursday, 28 May)
• Re: [editing-explainer] spell checking should be able to span multiple Typing Nodes (#50) (Thursday, 28 May)
• Re: [editing-explainer] Can we use textnodes, and block/inline nodes as shadow roots for transparent IME handling? (#57) (Thursday, 28 May)
• Re: [editing-explainer] Can we use textnodes, and block/inline nodes as shadow roots for transparent IME handling? (#57) (Thursday, 28 May)
• Re: [editing-explainer] What browser internals can be exposed to help us move the caret in (and against) the block direction? (#56) (Thursday, 28 May)
• Re: [editing-explainer] spell checking should be able to span multiple Typing Nodes (#50) (Thursday, 28 May)
• Re: [editing-explainer] Can we use textnodes, and block/inline nodes as shadow roots for transparent IME handling? (#57) (Thursday, 28 May)
• Re: [editing-explainer] How can sites access browser spellchecking? (#36) (Thursday, 28 May)
• Re: [editing-explainer] What browser internals can be exposed to help us move the caret in (and against) the block direction? (#56) (Thursday, 28 May)
• Re: [editing-explainer] spell checking should be able to span multiple Typing Nodes (#50) (Thursday, 28 May)
• Re: [editing-explainer] Can we use textnodes, and block/inline nodes as shadow roots for transparent IME handling? (#57) (Thursday, 28 May)
• Re: [editing-explainer] How can sites access browser spellchecking? (#36) (Thursday, 28 May)
• Re: [editing-explainer] spell checking should be able to span multiple Typing Nodes (#50) (Thursday, 28 May)
• Re: [editing-explainer] Can we use textnodes, and block/inline nodes as shadow roots for transparent IME handling? (#57) (Thursday, 28 May)
• Re: [editing-explainer] How can sites access browser spellchecking? (#36) (Thursday, 28 May)
• Re: [editing-explainer] What browser internals can be exposed to help us move the caret in (and against) the block direction? (#56) (Thursday, 28 May)
• Re: [editing-explainer] Can we use textnodes, and block/inline nodes as shadow roots for transparent IME handling? (#57) (Thursday, 28 May)
• Re: [editing-explainer] spell checking should be able to span multiple Typing Nodes (#50) (Thursday, 28 May)
• Re: [editing-explainer] How can sites access browser spellchecking? (#36) (Thursday, 28 May)
• Re: [editing-explainer] What browser internals can be exposed to help us move the caret in (and against) the block direction? (#56) (Thursday, 28 May)
• Re: [editing-explainer] Can we use textnodes, and block/inline nodes as shadow roots for transparent IME handling? (#57) (Thursday, 28 May)
• Re: [editing-explainer] spell checking should be able to span multiple Typing Nodes (#50) (Thursday, 28 May)
• Re: [editing-explainer] What caret positions do we need to allow? (#51) (Thursday, 28 May)
• Re: [editing-explainer] What browser internals can be exposed to help us move the caret in (and against) the block direction? (#56) (Thursday, 28 May)
• Re: [editing-explainer] Can we use textnodes, and block/inline nodes as shadow roots for transparent IME handling? (#57) (Thursday, 28 May)
• Re: [editing-explainer] How does cE=typing support IME text replacement? (#34) (Wednesday, 27 May)
• Re: [editing-explainer] How can sites access browser spellchecking? (#36) (Thursday, 28 May)
• Re: [editing-explainer] How can sites access browser spellchecking? (#36) (Thursday, 28 May)
• Re: [editing-explainer] Do we need formatting events? (#49) (Wednesday, 27 May)
• Re: [editing-explainer] spell checking should be able to span multiple Typing Nodes (#50) (Thursday, 28 May)
• Re: [editing-explainer] What should be the target element for Responsive Input Events? (#24) (Wednesday, 27 May)
• Re: [editing-explainer] What should be the target element for Responsive Input Events? (#24) (Wednesday, 27 May)
• Re: [editing-explainer] ContentEditable with UserSelect=None needs to be documented (#20) (Wednesday, 27 May)
• Re: [editing-explainer] Need to be clear about users having control, then sites, then browser (#13) (Wednesday, 27 May)
• Re: [editing-explainer] Need to be clear about users having control, then sites, then browser (#13) (Wednesday, 27 May)
• [editing-explainer] Can we use textnodes, and block/inline nodes as shadow roots for transparent IME handeling? (#57) (Wednesday, 27 May)
• Re: [editing-explainer] How can we integrate with rich forms and validation? (#6) (Wednesday, 27 May)
• [editing-explainer] What browser internals can be exposed to help us move the caret in (and against) the block direction? (#56) (Wednesday, 27 May)
• [editing-explainer] switch caret between overtype and insert (#55) (Wednesday, 27 May)
• Re: [editing-explainer] How can we integrate with rich forms and validation? (#6) (Wednesday, 27 May)
• Re: [editing-explainer] Should sites be able to control Responsive Input Language? (#31) (Wednesday, 27 May)
• Re: [editing-explainer] Should sites be able to control Responsive Input Language? (#31) (Wednesday, 27 May)
• Re: [editing-explainer] How does cE=typing work with overtype (insert key is on) (#28) (Wednesday, 27 May)
• Re: [editing-explainer] How does cE=typing work with overtype (insert key is on) (#28) (Wednesday, 27 May)
• [editing-explainer] What to do with execCommand (#53) (Wednesday, 27 May)
• [editing-explainer] What to do with contentEditableTrue? (#54) (Wednesday, 27 May)
• Re: [editing-explainer] ContentEditable with UserSelect=None needs to be documented (#20) (Wednesday, 27 May)
• Re: [editing-explainer] Notification after completion of Responsive Input Event (especially "custom" event types) (#17) (Wednesday, 27 May)
• Re: [editing-explainer] Notification after completion of Responsive Input Event (especially "custom" event types) (#17) (Wednesday, 27 May)
• [editing-explainer] legal caret states (#51) (Wednesday, 27 May)
• Re: [editing-explainer] replaceText input event could span multiple Typing Nodes (#50) (Tuesday, 26 May)
• Re: [editing-explainer] ContentEditable with UserSelect=None needs to be documented (#20) (Tuesday, 26 May)
• Re: [editing-explainer] replaceText input event could span multiple Typing Nodes (#50) (Tuesday, 26 May)
• Re: [editing-explainer] replaceText input event could span multiple Typing Nodes (#50) (Tuesday, 26 May)
• Re: [editing-explainer] replaceText input event could span multiple Typing Nodes (#50) (Tuesday, 26 May)
• Re: [editing-explainer] replaceText input event could span multiple Typing Nodes (#50) (Monday, 25 May)
• Re: [editing-explainer] replaceText input event could span multiple Typing Nodes (#50) (Monday, 25 May)
• Re: [editing-explainer] replaceText input event could span multiple Typing Nodes (#50) (Monday, 25 May)
• Re: [editing-explainer] replaceText input event could span multiple Typing Nodes (#50) (Monday, 25 May)
• Re: [editing-explainer] replaceText input event could span multiple Typing Nodes (#50) (Monday, 25 May)
• Re: [editing-explainer] ContentEditable with UserSelect=None needs to be documented (#20) (Monday, 25 May)
• Re: [editing-explainer] ContentEditable with UserSelect=None needs to be documented (#20) (Monday, 25 May)
• Re: [editing-explainer] ContentEditable with UserSelect=None needs to be documented (#20) (Monday, 25 May)
• Re: [editing-explainer] Target range in device independent events (#39) (Monday, 25 May)
• Re: [editing-explainer] Target range in device independent events (#39) (Monday, 25 May)
• Re: [editing-explainer] How should custom controls declare their Responsive Input mapping? (#18) (Monday, 25 May)
• Re: [editing-explainer] How should custom controls declare their Responsive Input mapping? (#18) (Monday, 25 May)
• Re: [editing-explainer] replaceText input event could span multiple Typing Nodes (#50) (Monday, 25 May)
• Re: [editing-explainer] replaceText input event could span multiple Typing Nodes (#50) (Monday, 25 May)
• Re: [editing-explainer] intents originating from components resp. scripts (#16) (Monday, 25 May)
• Re: [editing-explainer] intents originating from components resp. scripts (#16) (Monday, 25 May)
• Re: [editing-explainer] Should undo/redo be beforeInput events? (#30) (Monday, 25 May)
• Re: [editing-explainer] Should undo/redo be beforeInput events? (#30) (Monday, 25 May)
• Re: [editing-explainer] Support for custom Responsive Input events (#14) (Monday, 25 May)
• Re: [editing-explainer] Support for custom Responsive Input events (#14) (Monday, 25 May)
• Re: [editing-explainer] Prevent recursive beforeInput calls (#44) (Monday, 25 May)
• Re: [editing-explainer] Prevent recursive beforeInput calls (#44) (Monday, 25 May)
• Re: [editing-explainer] How can sites access browser spellchecking? (#36) (Monday, 25 May)
• Re: [editing-explainer] How can sites access browser spellchecking? (#36) (Monday, 25 May)
• [editing-explainer] formatting events (#49) (Monday, 25 May)
• Re: [editing-explainer] Should undo/redo be beforeInput events? (#30) (Monday, 25 May)
• Re: [editing-explainer] define relation to HTML Editing APIs (#48) (Monday, 25 May)
• Re: [editing-explainer] define relation to HTML Editing APIs (#48) (Monday, 25 May)
• Re: [editing-explainer] How does cE=typing support IME text replacement? (#34) (Monday, 25 May)
• Re: [editing-explainer] D3E defines input event should be fired immediately after the DOM as been updated but it shouldn't be so if the editor value is changed by setting value attribute (#41) (Monday, 25 May)
• Re: [editing-explainer] D3E defines input event should be fired immediately after the DOM as been updated but it shouldn't be so if the editor value is changed by setting value attribute (#41) (Monday, 25 May)
• Re: [editing-explainer] beforeinput should be fired only when the DOM change is caused by direct input by keypress or composition (#43) (Monday, 25 May)
• Re: [editing-explainer] how does cE=typing handle autocorrect and spelling suggestions? (#37) (Monday, 25 May)
• Re: [editing-explainer] How does cE=typing support IME text replacement? (#34) (Monday, 25 May)
• Re: [editing-explainer] How should custom controls declare their Responsive Input mapping? (#18) (Monday, 25 May)
• Re: [editing-explainer] behavior of text nodes inside cE=typing (#22) (Sunday, 24 May)
• Re: [editing-explainer] behavior of text nodes inside cE=typing (#22) (Sunday, 24 May)
• Re: [editing-explainer] define relation to HTML Editing APIs (#48) (Tuesday, 19 May)
• Re: [editing-explainer] define relation to HTML Editing APIs (#48) (Tuesday, 19 May)
• Re: [editing-explainer] define relation to HTML Editing APIs (#48) (Monday, 18 May)
• [editing-explainer] define relation to HTML Editing APIs (#48) (Monday, 18 May)

Jonas Sicking

• Re: [permissions] Why "prompt" instead of "default"? (#25) (Friday, 8 May)
• Re: [permissions] Why "prompt" instead of "default"? (#25) (Thursday, 7 May)
• Re: [permissions] Why "prompt" instead of "default"? (#25) (Tuesday, 5 May)
• Re: [permissions] Why "prompt" instead of "default"? (#25) (Monday, 4 May)
• Re: [permissions] Why "prompt" instead of "default"? (#25) (Monday, 4 May)

Joshua Bell

• Re: [IndexedDB] Allow renaming object stores and indexes (#22) (Friday, 29 May)
• [IndexedDB] Allow renaming object stores and indexes (#22) (Friday, 29 May)
• Re: [IndexedDB] Add openCursor(key, primaryKey) and continuePrimaryKey (#14) (Thursday, 28 May)
• [IndexedDB] Support binary keys (#21) (Wednesday, 27 May)
• Re: [IndexedDB] Support binary keys (#21) (Wednesday, 27 May)
• Re: [IndexedDB] transaction (concept) should have an error property (#17) (Wednesday, 27 May)
• Re: [IndexedDB] database version in deleteDatabase is not defined (#6) (Wednesday, 27 May)
• Re: [IndexedDB] Specify 'deleted' property of stores/indexes (#7) (Wednesday, 27 May)
• Re: [IndexedDB] Specify 'deleted' property of stores/indexes (#7) (Wednesday, 27 May)
• Re: [IndexedDB] Distinguish object store from thing IDBObjectStore represents (#3) (Wednesday, 27 May)
• Re: [IndexedDB] Distinguish object store from thing IDBObjectStore represents (#3) (Wednesday, 27 May)
• Re: [IndexedDB] Ensure connection/handle properties are snapshots (#20) (Wednesday, 27 May)
• [IndexedDB] Ensure connection/handle properties are snapshots (#20) (Tuesday, 26 May)
• Re: [IndexedDB] Distinguish object store from thing IDBObjectStore represents (#3) (Tuesday, 26 May)
• [IndexedDB] Introduce IDBKeySet (#19) (Saturday, 23 May)
• Re: [IndexedDB] Add scope attribute to IDBTransaction (#18) (Friday, 22 May)
• [IndexedDB] Add scope attribute to IDBTransaction (#18) (Friday, 22 May)
• Re: [IndexedDB] Replace DOMError with DOMException (#16) (Friday, 22 May)
• [IndexedDB] transaction (concept) should have an error property (#17) (Friday, 22 May)
• [IndexedDB] Replace DOMError with DOMException (#16) (Thursday, 21 May)
• [IndexedDB] Import issues from Bugzilla (#15) (Tuesday, 19 May)
• [IndexedDB] Add openCursor(key, primaryKey) and continuePrimaryKey (#14) (Tuesday, 19 May)
• Re: [IndexedDB] Consider introducing "unbounded range" (#13) (Tuesday, 19 May)
• Re: [IndexedDB] Standardize key-or-keyrange argument handling (#12) (Tuesday, 19 May)
• [IndexedDB] Consider introducing "unbounded range" (#13) (Tuesday, 19 May)
• [IndexedDB] Standardize key-or-keyrange argument handling (#12) (Tuesday, 19 May)
• [IndexedDB] Validate exception ordering against implementations (#11) (Monday, 18 May)
• [IndexedDB] Standardize relationship between concept-objects and interface-objects (#10) (Monday, 18 May)
• Re: [IndexedDB] Specify 'deleted' property of stores/indexes (#7) (Monday, 18 May)
• [IndexedDB] task behavior for open requests is poorly specified (#9) (Wednesday, 13 May)
• Re: [IndexedDB] Asynchronously completed operations should "queue a task" (#1) (Wednesday, 13 May)
• Re: [IndexedDB] Asynchronously completed operations should "queue a task" (#1) (Wednesday, 13 May)
• Re: [IndexedDB] Define key extraction/injection using [[DefineOwnProperty]] and [[Get]] (#2) (Wednesday, 13 May)
• Re: [IndexedDB] Define key extraction/injection using [[DefineOwnProperty]] and [[Get]] (#2) (Wednesday, 13 May)
• Re: [IndexedDB] Introduce Upgrades as concept section (#8) (Wednesday, 13 May)
• Re: [IndexedDB] Introduce Upgrades as concept section (#8) (Wednesday, 13 May)
• [IndexedDB] Introduce Upgrades as concept section (#8) (Wednesday, 13 May)
• Re: [IndexedDB] Distinguish object store from thing IDBObjectStore represents (#3) (Tuesday, 12 May)
• Re: [IndexedDB] Convert remaining methods to "algorithmic style" (#5) (Monday, 11 May)
• Re: [IndexedDB] Convert remaining methods to "algorithmic style" (#5) (Monday, 11 May)
• [IndexedDB] Specify 'deleted' property of stores/indexes (#7) (Monday, 11 May)
• [IndexedDB] database version in deleteDatabase is not defined (#6) (Monday, 11 May)
• Re: [IndexedDB] Keypath evaluation steps yield a value, not a key (#4) (Monday, 11 May)
• [IndexedDB] Convert remaining methods to "algorithmic style" (#5) (Friday, 8 May)
• [IndexedDB] Keypath evaluation steps yield a value, not a key (#4) (Friday, 8 May)
• [IndexedDB] Distinguish object store from thing IDBObjectStore represents (#3) (Thursday, 7 May)
• Re: [ServiceWorker] add [NewObject] where appropriate (#692) (Thursday, 7 May)

Jungkee Song

• Re: [ServiceWorker] MessageEvent within the SW global should have waitUntil() (#669) (Wednesday, 27 May)
• Re: [ServiceWorker] Consider dropping initServiceWorkerMessageEvent() (#701) (Thursday, 21 May)
• Re: [ServiceWorker] Consider dropping initServiceWorkerMessageEvent() (#701) (Thursday, 21 May)
• Re: [ServiceWorker] Consider dropping initServiceWorkerMessageEvent() (#701) (Wednesday, 20 May)
• Re: [ServiceWorker] Step 5.3 of openWindow does "exceptions enabled" which doesn't make sense (#694) (Wednesday, 20 May)
• Re: [ServiceWorker] Navigating clients from the SW context? (#681) (Wednesday, 20 May)
• Re: [ServiceWorker] Fallback to App Cache (#697) (Monday, 11 May)
• Re: [ServiceWorker] Consider producing distinct objects for the same entity to enable garbage collection (#416) (Monday, 11 May)
• Re: [ServiceWorker] There should be no such thing as "fail to activate" (#659) (Friday, 8 May)
• Re: [ServiceWorker] There should be no such thing as "fail to activate" (#659) (Friday, 8 May)
• Re: [ServiceWorker] add [NewObject] where appropriate (#692) (Friday, 8 May)
• Re: [ServiceWorker] Consider producing distinct objects for the same entity to enable garbage collection (#416) (Thursday, 7 May)
• Re: [ServiceWorker] Consider producing distinct objects for the same entity to enable garbage collection (#416) (Thursday, 7 May)
• Re: [ServiceWorker] Consider producing distinct objects for the same entity to enable garbage collection (#416) (Thursday, 7 May)
• Re: [ServiceWorker] Consider producing distinct objects for the same entity to enable garbage collection (#416) (Thursday, 7 May)
• Re: [ServiceWorker] add [NewObject] where appropriate (#692) (Thursday, 7 May)
• Re: [ServiceWorker] add [NewObject] where appropriate (#692) (Thursday, 7 May)
• Re: [ServiceWorker] MessageEvent within the SW global should have waitUntil() (#669) (Wednesday, 6 May)
• Re: [ServiceWorker] should SW MessageEvents inherit ExtendableEvent? (#690) (Monday, 4 May)
• Re: [ServiceWorker] should SW MessageEvents inherit ExtendableEvent? (#690) (Monday, 4 May)
• Re: [ServiceWorker] self.caches should spec what to do for "untrusted" origins (#687) (Monday, 4 May)

Jussi Kalliokoski

• Re: [fetch] XHR option to trigger busy indicators (#19) (Friday, 15 May)

karolklp

• [ServiceWorker] What's proper SW name? :) (#705) (Friday, 29 May)
• Re: [ServiceWorker] Replaying POST requests (#693) (Wednesday, 20 May)
• Re: [ServiceWorker] You don't need any flags in Chrome today :) (#686) (Monday, 11 May)
• [ServiceWorker] Replaying POST requests (#693) (Thursday, 7 May)

Kenneth Auchenberg

• Re: [ServiceWorker] WebRTC and getUserMedia within Service Worker (#670) (Monday, 25 May)

Kenneth Rohde Christiansen

• Re: [manifest] i18n: No localization model; [I18N-ISSUE-412] (#338) (Friday, 15 May)
• Re: [manifest] Typo fix (#379) (Wednesday, 6 May)
• Re: [manifest] Typo fix (#379) (Wednesday, 6 May)
• Re: [manifest] Added splashscreens member (closes #9) (8711327) (Tuesday, 5 May)
• Re: [manifest] Make manifest authoritative + allow CORS (closes #376, #375, #360, #330, #351, #272) (4145171) (Tuesday, 5 May)

Kinuko Yasuda

• Re: [ServiceWorker] ServiceWorker registration fails inside an https-origin IFRAME when the top-level page is not secure (e.g. http or data URI) (#700) (Wednesday, 20 May)
• Re: [ServiceWorker] ServiceWorker registration fails inside an https-origin IFRAME when the top-level page is not secure (e.g. http or data URI) (#700) (Tuesday, 19 May)

Koji Ishii

• Re: [editing-explainer] How can sites access browser spellchecking? (#36) (Thursday, 28 May)
• Re: [editing-explainer] What caret positions do we need to allow? (#51) (Thursday, 28 May)
• Re: [editing-explainer] Can we use textnodes, and block/inline nodes as shadow roots for transparent IME handling? (#57) (Thursday, 28 May)
• Re: [editing-explainer] What browser internals can be exposed to help us move the caret in (and against) the block direction? (#56) (Thursday, 28 May)
• Re: [editing-explainer] What browser internals can be exposed to help us move the caret in (and against) the block direction? (#56) (Thursday, 28 May)
• Re: [editing-explainer] Can we use textnodes, and block/inline nodes as shadow roots for transparent IME handling? (#57) (Thursday, 28 May)
• Re: [editing-explainer] What caret positions do we need to allow? (#51) (Thursday, 28 May)
• Re: [editing-explainer] How can sites access browser spellchecking? (#36) (Thursday, 28 May)
• Re: [editing-explainer] ContentEditable with UserSelect=None needs to be documented (#20) (Tuesday, 26 May)

Kornel

• Re: [manifest] Ability to define platform-specific icon style (#361) (Thursday, 14 May)

Kyle Simpson

• Re: [fetch] Aborting a fetch (#27) (Friday, 15 May)
• Re: [fetch] Aborting a fetch (#27) (Friday, 1 May)

Lewis Phạm

• Re: [ServiceWorker] WebRTC and getUserMedia within Service Worker (#670) (Monday, 25 May)
• Re: [ServiceWorker] WebRTC and getUserMedia within Service Worker (#670) (Monday, 25 May)

littledan

• [webidl] typo in the definition of an unrestricted double? (#51) (Sunday, 31 May)

Louis Ryan

• Re: [fetch] Access to the HTTP trailer (#34) (Wednesday, 13 May)
• Re: [fetch] Access to the HTTP trailer (#34) (Wednesday, 13 May)

Luke Page

• [fetch] PATCH verb (#50) (Thursday, 7 May)

Manish Goregaokar

• Re: [fetch] XHR option to trigger busy indicators (#19) (Friday, 15 May)
• Re: [fetch] XHR option to trigger busy indicators (#19) (Friday, 15 May)
• Re: [fetch] XHR option to trigger busy indicators (#19) (Friday, 15 May)
• Re: [fetch] XHR option to trigger busy indicators (#19) (Friday, 15 May)
• Re: [fetch] XHR option to trigger busy indicators (#19) (Friday, 15 May)

manuelmitasch

• Re: [ServiceWorker] Should window.caches be removed (or readonly) for security reasons? (#698) (Thursday, 28 May)
• Re: [ServiceWorker] Should window.caches be removed (or readonly) for security reasons? (#698) (Thursday, 28 May)
• Re: [ServiceWorker] Should window.caches be removed (or readonly) for security reasons? (#698) (Thursday, 28 May)
• Re: [ServiceWorker] Should window.caches be removed (or readonly) for security reasons? (#698) (Thursday, 28 May)
• Re: [ServiceWorker] Should window.caches be removed (or readonly) for security reasons? (#698) (Thursday, 28 May)
• Re: [ServiceWorker] Should window.caches be removed (or readonly) for security reasons? (#698) (Monday, 25 May)
• Re: [ServiceWorker] Should window.caches be removed (or readonly) for security reasons? (#698) (Saturday, 23 May)
• Re: [ServiceWorker] Should window.caches be removed (or readonly) for security reasons? (#698) (Saturday, 23 May)
• [ServiceWorker] Should window.caches be removed (or readonly) for security reasons? (#698) (Monday, 11 May)

Marcos Caceres

• Re: [manifest] A means to control how long a splash screen should remain on screen. (#372) (Monday, 25 May)
• Re: [manifest] Manifest format should support some way of including a splash screen (#9) (Monday, 25 May)
• Re: [manifest] Manifest format should support some way of including a splash screen (#9) (Monday, 25 May)
• Re: [manifest] Manifest format should support some way of including a splash screen (#9) (Monday, 25 May)
• Re: [manifest] Provide better examples of scope (#380) (Tuesday, 19 May)
• Re: [manifest] Provide better examples of scope (#380) (Tuesday, 19 May)
• Re: [manifest] i18n: No localization model; [I18N-ISSUE-412] (#338) (Friday, 15 May)
• Re: [manifest] i18n: No localization model; [I18N-ISSUE-412] (#338) (Friday, 15 May)
• Re: [manifest] Ability to define platform-specific icon style (#361) (Thursday, 14 May)
• Re: [manifest] i18n: No localization model; [I18N-ISSUE-412] (#338) (Wednesday, 13 May)
• Re: [manifest] i18n: No localization model; [I18N-ISSUE-412] (#338) (Wednesday, 13 May)
• Re: [manifest] Provide better examples of scope (#380) (Monday, 11 May)
• Re: [manifest] A means to control how long a splash screen should remain on screen. (#372) (Saturday, 9 May)
• [manifest] Provide better examples of scope (#380) (Friday, 8 May)
• Re: [fetch] Added manifest-src directive to request rel. table (#46) (Wednesday, 6 May)
• Re: [manifest] A means to control how long a splash screen should remain on screen. (#372) (Wednesday, 6 May)
• Re: [manifest] Define identity of a web app. (#272) (Tuesday, 5 May)
• Re: [manifest] Manifest format should support some way of including a splash screen (#9) (Tuesday, 5 May)
• Re: [manifest] Added splashscreens member (closes #9) (#378) (Tuesday, 5 May)
• [manifest] Added splashscreens member (closes #9) (#378) (Tuesday, 5 May)
• Re: [manifest] Added splash_screens member (closes #9) (#371) (Tuesday, 5 May)
• Re: [manifest] Add meta tags equivs. for features were possible (#350) (Tuesday, 5 May)
• Re: [manifest] Add meta tags equivs. for features were possible (#350) (Tuesday, 5 May)
• Re: [manifest] Must manifests be same-origin? (#360) (Tuesday, 5 May)
• Re: [manifest] Must manifests be same-origin? (#360) (Tuesday, 5 May)
• Re: [manifest] Must manifests be same-origin? (#360) (Tuesday, 5 May)
• Re: [manifest] Made using fallbacks normative (closes #350) (#351) (Tuesday, 5 May)
• Re: [manifest] Must manifests be same-origin? (#360) (Tuesday, 5 May)
• Re: [manifest] Resolve start_url against manifest URL (#330) (Tuesday, 5 May)
• Re: [manifest] From a security perspective, why should the manifest be same origin? (#375) (Tuesday, 5 May)
• Re: [manifest] Make manifest authoritative + allow CORS (closes #376, #375, #360, #330,#351, #272) (#377) (Tuesday, 5 May)
• Re: [manifest] Should a manifest unambigiously and authoritively be the app's metadata? (#376) (Tuesday, 5 May)
• [manifest] Make manifest authoritative + allow CORS (closes #376, #375, #360, #330,#351, #272) (#377) (Tuesday, 5 May)
• Re: [manifest] Obtaining a Manifest should follow usual CORS rules with credentials. (#353) (Tuesday, 5 May)
• Re: [manifest] Obtaining a Manifest should follow usual CORS rules with credentials. (#353) (Tuesday, 5 May)
• Re: [fetch] Added manifest-src directive to request rel. table (#46) (Tuesday, 5 May)
• Re: [fetch] Added manifest-src directive to request rel. table (1d51c7c) (Tuesday, 5 May)
• Re: [fetch] Added manifest-src directive to request rel. table (1d51c7c) (Tuesday, 5 May)
• [fetch] Added manifest-src directive to request rel. table (#46) (Tuesday, 5 May)
• Re: [manifest] Obtaining a Manifest should follow usual CORS rules with credentials. (#353) (Monday, 4 May)
• Re: [manifest] Define identity of a web app. (#272) (Monday, 4 May)
• Re: [permissions] Why "prompt" instead of "default"? (#25) (Monday, 4 May)
• Re: [manifest] Should a manifest unambigiously and authoritively be the app's metadata? (#376) (Friday, 1 May)

Mark Nottingham

• Re: [spec-reviews] rough in fingerprinting (ba748e3) (Friday, 22 May)
• Re: [spec-reviews] rough in fingerprinting (ba748e3) (Friday, 22 May)
• Re: [fetch] Access to the HTTP trailer (#34) (Wednesday, 13 May)
• Re: [spec-reviews] Strawman spec review for upgrade insecure requests (#54) (Sunday, 10 May)
• Re: [fetch] Initializing context/content specific fetch defaults (#43) (Friday, 1 May)

Martin Thomson

• Re: [push-api] pushregistrationlost isn't documented (#149) (Tuesday, 26 May)
• Re: [push-api] pushregistrationlost isn't documented (#149) (Tuesday, 26 May)
• Re: [push-api] pushregistrationlost isn't documented (#149) (Tuesday, 26 May)
• Re: [push-api] pushregistrationlost isn't documented (#149) (Thursday, 21 May)
• [push-api] pushregistrationlost isn't documented (#149) (Thursday, 21 May)
• Re: [push-api] Fire pushsubscriptionchange when user revokes permission (#116) (Thursday, 21 May)
• [push-api] Making cardinality clear (#148) (Thursday, 21 May)
• Re: [fetch] Access to the HTTP trailer (#34) (Wednesday, 13 May)
• [fetch] HTTP/2 server push support (#51) (Wednesday, 13 May)
• Re: [fetch] Access to the HTTP trailer (#34) (Wednesday, 13 May)
• Re: [permissions] Why "prompt" instead of "default"? (#25) (Friday, 8 May)
• Re: [permissions] Tackle origin (#34) (Thursday, 7 May)
• Re: [permissions] Why "prompt" instead of "default"? (#25) (Wednesday, 6 May)
• Re: [permissions] Tackle origin (#34) (Wednesday, 6 May)
• Re: [permissions] What should "retrieve the permission state" do for context related permissions? (#9) (Wednesday, 6 May)
• Re: [permissions] What should "retrieve the permission state" do for pickers? (#8) (Wednesday, 6 May)
• Re: [push-api] userVisible -> userVisibleOnly (#137) (Friday, 1 May)

Mathias Bynens

• Re: [encoding] Benefits of "Legacy" Encodings – Byte Counter (#4) (Tuesday, 19 May)
• Re: [encoding] Benefits of "Legacy" Encodings – Byte Counter (#4) (Tuesday, 19 May)

Matt Cook

• Re: [ServiceWorker] allow self-signed certificates (#691) (Monday, 4 May)
• [ServiceWorker] allow self-signed certificates (#691) (Friday, 1 May)

Matt Falkenhagen

• Re: [ServiceWorker] MessageEvent within the SW global should have waitUntil() (#669) (Thursday, 28 May)
• Re: [ServiceWorker] MessageEvent within the SW global should have waitUntil() (#669) (Tuesday, 26 May)
• Re: [push-api] Push events should Soft Update service worker (#115) (Wednesday, 20 May)
• Re: [ServiceWorker] under what conditions should sandboxed iframes be intercepted? (#648) (Tuesday, 12 May)
• Re: [ServiceWorker] Fallback to App Cache (#697) (Tuesday, 12 May)
• Re: [fetch] Cache mode: security review (#39) (Thursday, 7 May)
• [push-api] Push event shouldn't be dispatched to an activating worker (#147) (Thursday, 7 May)
• Re: [ServiceWorker] Privacy consideration about the "cache" parameter of the Request object (#585) (Thursday, 7 May)

Michael van Ouwerkerk

• Re: [push-api] pushregistrationlost isn't documented (#149) (Tuesday, 26 May)
• Re: [push-api] pushregistrationlost isn't documented (#149) (Tuesday, 26 May)
• Re: [push-api] Making cardinality clear (#148) (Thursday, 21 May)

Mike West

• Re: [spec-reviews] rough in fingerprinting (ba748e3) (Friday, 22 May)
• Re: [spec-reviews] rough in fingerprinting (ba748e3) (Friday, 22 May)
• Re: [spec-reviews] rough in fingerprinting (ba748e3) (Friday, 22 May)
• Re: [spec-reviews] rough in fingerprinting (ba748e3) (Friday, 22 May)
• Re: [fetch] CSP Request Header and CORS preflight fetch. (#52) (Friday, 15 May)
• Re: [fetch] Allow context to be set (#48) (Thursday, 7 May)
• Re: [spec-reviews] Strawman spec review for upgrade insecure requests (#54) (Thursday, 7 May)
• Re: [spec-reviews] Strawman spec review for upgrade insecure requests (#54) (Wednesday, 6 May)
• Re: [spec-reviews] Strawman spec review for upgrade insecure requests (#54) (Wednesday, 6 May)
• Re: [spec-reviews] Strawman spec review for upgrade insecure requests (#54) (Wednesday, 6 May)
• Re: [spec-reviews] Strawman spec review for upgrade insecure requests (#54) (Wednesday, 6 May)

Mounir Lamouri

• Re: [manifest] Manifest format should support some way of including a splash screen (#9) (Sunday, 24 May)
• Re: [manifest] Manifest format should support some way of including a splash screen (#9) (Sunday, 24 May)
• Re: [manifest] A means to control how long a splash screen should remain on screen. (#372) (Sunday, 24 May)
• Re: [permissions] Tackle origin (#34) (Thursday, 7 May)

Ms2ger

• [fetch] Rename `response` in HTTP fetch 3.1.1-2 (#54) (Tuesday, 19 May)

Nicholas Jakobsen

• Re: [selection-api] Specify Selection.modify()? (#37) (Monday, 4 May)

Nick Doty

• [permissions] status of this document: reached FPWD (#36) (Saturday, 30 May)
• Re: [permissions] Tackle origin (#34) (Saturday, 30 May)

Nikhil Marathe

• [push-api] getSubscription() should permission check (#150) (Wednesday, 27 May)
• Re: [push-api] Fire pushsubscriptionchange when user revokes permission (#116) (Wednesday, 27 May)
• Re: [ServiceWorker] How are unloaded tabs represented? (#626) (Thursday, 7 May)

ojan

• Re: [webcomponents] Update Imperative-API-for-Node-Distribution-in-Shadow-DOM.md (#49) (Tuesday, 5 May)
• [webcomponents] Update Imperative-API-for-Node-Distribution-in-Shadow-DOM.md (#49) (Tuesday, 5 May)

Olivier Forget

• Re: [editing] What browser internals can be exposed to help us move the caret in (and against) the block direction? (#56) (Friday, 29 May)
• Re: [editing-explainer] replaceText input event could span multiple Typing Nodes (#50) (Monday, 25 May)
• Re: [editing-explainer] replaceText input event could span multiple Typing Nodes (#50) (Monday, 25 May)
• Re: [editing-explainer] replaceText input event could span multiple Typing Nodes (#50) (Monday, 25 May)
• Re: [editing-explainer] replaceText input event could span multiple Typing Nodes (#50) (Monday, 25 May)
• [editing-explainer] replaceText input event could span multiple Typing Nodes (#50) (Monday, 25 May)

Patrick H. Lauke

• Re: [touch-events] Spec should be explicit on whether the of elements in TouchLists is relevant (#13) (Monday, 11 May)
• Re: [touch-events] Spec should be explicit on whether the of elements in TouchLists is relevant (#13) (Friday, 8 May)

Paul Cotton

• Re: [streams] Support reading bytes into buffers allocated by user code on platforms where only async read is available (#253) (Tuesday, 5 May)

Peter Beverloo

• Re: [push-api] Rename hasPermission (#136) (Friday, 1 May)
• Re: [push-api] userVisible -> userVisibleOnly (#137) (Friday, 1 May)

Petka Antonov

• Re: [fetch] Aborting a fetch (#27) (Friday, 15 May)
• Re: [fetch] Aborting a fetch (#27) (Friday, 15 May)
• Re: [fetch] Aborting a fetch (#27) (Friday, 15 May)

Philip Jägenstedt

• Re: [xhr] Abandon hope of removing sync XHR from the web platform? (#20) (Friday, 29 May)
• Re: [xhr] Abandon hope of removing sync XHR from the web platform? (#20) (Thursday, 28 May)
• [xhr] Abandon hope of removing sync XHR from the web platform? (#20) (Thursday, 28 May)
• Re: [webcomponents] [Shadow]: The return type of Event.path should leverage WebIDL sequences (bugzilla: 25458) (#101) (Wednesday, 27 May)
• [xhr] Remove XMLHttpRequest from ServiceWorkerGlobalScope (#19) (Tuesday, 26 May)
• Re: [dom] Add [TreatNullAs=EmptyString] to Attr.nodeValue/textContent (#36) (Saturday, 23 May)
• [dom] Add [TreatNullAs=EmptyString] to Attr.nodeValue/textContent (#36) (Friday, 22 May)
• [fullscreen] Make fullscreenElement and fullscreenEnabled [Replaceable]? (#2) (Thursday, 7 May)

r0b5t4

• Re: [manifest] i18n: No localization model; [I18N-ISSUE-412] (#338) (Wednesday, 13 May)
• Re: [manifest] i18n: No localization model; [I18N-ISSUE-412] (#338) (Wednesday, 13 May)

Rick Byers

• Re: [touch-events] Spec should be explicit on whether the of elements in TouchLists is relevant (#13) (Tuesday, 12 May)
• Re: [touch-events] Spec should be explicit on whether the of elements in TouchLists is relevant (#13) (Monday, 11 May)
• [touch-events] Spec should be explicit on whether the of elements in TouchLists is relevant (#13) (Friday, 8 May)
• Re: [spec-reviews] CSSOM View document.scrollingElement (#51) (Tuesday, 5 May)

Rob Wu

• Re: [fetch] Aborting a fetch (#27) (Friday, 15 May)
• [fetch] Abort fetch upon unload document unload (#53) (Friday, 15 May)

Ryosuke Niwa

• Re: [editing] What browser internals can be exposed to help us move the caret in (and against) the block direction? (#56) (Sunday, 31 May)
• Re: [webcomponents] [Shadow]: rename <content> to <slot> (bugzilla: 28561) (#92) (Sunday, 31 May)
• Re: [editing] What browser internals can be exposed to help us move the caret in (and against) the block direction? (#56) (Friday, 29 May)
• Re: [editing] Can we use textnodes, and block/inline nodes as shadow roots for transparent IME handling? (#57) (Friday, 29 May)
• Re: [webcomponents] [Shadow]: rename <content> to <slot> (bugzilla: 28561) (#92) (Friday, 29 May)
• Re: [editing-explainer] What browser internals can be exposed to help us move the caret in (and against) the block direction? (#56) (Friday, 29 May)
• Re: [editing-explainer] Can we use textnodes, and block/inline nodes as shadow roots for transparent IME handling? (#57) (Friday, 29 May)
• Re: [editing-explainer] What browser internals can be exposed to help us move the caret in (and against) the block direction? (#56) (Thursday, 28 May)
• Re: [editing-explainer] What browser internals can be exposed to help us move the caret in (and against) the block direction? (#56) (Thursday, 28 May)
• Re: [editing-explainer] Can we use textnodes, and block/inline nodes as shadow roots for transparent IME handling? (#57) (Thursday, 28 May)
• Re: [editing-explainer] What browser internals can be exposed to help us move the caret in (and against) the block direction? (#56) (Thursday, 28 May)
• Re: [editing-explainer] Can we use textnodes, and block/inline nodes as shadow roots for transparent IME handling? (#57) (Thursday, 28 May)
• Re: [editing-explainer] Can we use textnodes, and block/inline nodes as shadow roots for transparent IME handling? (#57) (Thursday, 28 May)
• Re: [editing-explainer] Can we use textnodes, and block/inline nodes as shadow roots for transparent IME handling? (#57) (Thursday, 28 May)
• Re: [editing-explainer] What browser internals can be exposed to help us move the caret in (and against) the block direction? (#56) (Thursday, 28 May)
• Re: [editing-explainer] spell checking should be able to span multiple Typing Nodes (#50) (Thursday, 28 May)
• Re: [editing-explainer] Can we use textnodes, and block/inline nodes as shadow roots for transparent IME handling? (#57) (Thursday, 28 May)
• Re: [editing-explainer] How can sites access browser spellchecking? (#36) (Thursday, 28 May)
• Re: [editing-explainer] What browser internals can be exposed to help us move the caret in (and against) the block direction? (#56) (Thursday, 28 May)
• Re: [editing-explainer] spell checking should be able to span multiple Typing Nodes (#50) (Thursday, 28 May)
• Re: [editing-explainer] Can we use textnodes, and block/inline nodes as shadow roots for transparent IME handling? (#57) (Thursday, 28 May)
• Re: [editing-explainer] How can sites access browser spellchecking? (#36) (Thursday, 28 May)
• Re: [editing-explainer] What browser internals can be exposed to help us move the caret in (and against) the block direction? (#56) (Thursday, 28 May)
• Re: [editing-explainer] spell checking should be able to span multiple Typing Nodes (#50) (Thursday, 28 May)
• Re: [editing-explainer] Can we use textnodes, and block/inline nodes as shadow roots for transparent IME handling? (#57) (Thursday, 28 May)
• Re: [editing-explainer] How can sites access browser spellchecking? (#36) (Thursday, 28 May)
• Re: [editing-explainer] spell checking should be able to span multiple Typing Nodes (#50) (Thursday, 28 May)
• Re: [editing-explainer] Can we use textnodes, and block/inline nodes as shadow roots for transparent IME handling? (#57) (Thursday, 28 May)
• Re: [editing-explainer] How can sites access browser spellchecking? (#36) (Thursday, 28 May)
• Re: [editing-explainer] What browser internals can be exposed to help us move the caret in (and against) the block direction? (#56) (Thursday, 28 May)
• Re: [editing-explainer] Can we use textnodes, and block/inline nodes as shadow roots for transparent IME handling? (#57) (Thursday, 28 May)
• Re: [editing-explainer] spell checking should be able to span multiple Typing Nodes (#50) (Thursday, 28 May)
• Re: [editing-explainer] What browser internals can be exposed to help us move the caret in (and against) the block direction? (#56) (Thursday, 28 May)
• Re: [editing-explainer] Can we use textnodes, and block/inline nodes as shadow roots for transparent IME handling? (#57) (Thursday, 28 May)
• Re: [editing-explainer] spell checking should be able to span multiple Typing Nodes (#50) (Thursday, 28 May)
• Re: [editing-explainer] What caret positions do we need to allow? (#51) (Thursday, 28 May)
• Re: [editing-explainer] What browser internals can be exposed to help us move the caret in (and against) the block direction? (#56) (Thursday, 28 May)
• Re: [editing-explainer] Can we use textnodes, and block/inline nodes as shadow roots for transparent IME handling? (#57) (Thursday, 28 May)
• Re: [editing-explainer] How can sites access browser spellchecking? (#36) (Thursday, 28 May)
• Re: [webcomponents] Stubbed out Slots proposal. (#52) (Tuesday, 19 May)
• Re: [webcomponents] Timing experiment (#51) (Wednesday, 13 May)
• Re: [webcomponents] Started on partial redistributions analysis. (#50) (Wednesday, 6 May)
• Re: [webcomponents] Added fastdom callback idea. (#48) (Friday, 1 May)
• Re: [webcomponents] Added pure functions idea to the timing alternatives. (#47) (Friday, 1 May)
• Re: [webcomponents] Added pure functions idea to the timing alternatives. (#47) (Friday, 1 May)
• Re: [webcomponents] Added pure functions idea to the timing alternatives. (#47) (Friday, 1 May)
• [webcomponents] Fix the table-chart example (#46) (Friday, 1 May)
• Re: [webcomponents] Make proposals more clear (#45) (Friday, 1 May)
• [webcomponents] Add https://gist.github.com/rniwa/2f14588926e1a11c65d3 to proposals. (#44) (Friday, 1 May)
• Re: [webcomponents] Add `proposals` directory. (#43) (Friday, 1 May)

Scott González

• Re: [touch-events] Spec should be explicit on whether the of elements in TouchLists is relevant (#13) (Friday, 8 May)

Scott Kyle

• Re: [fetch] Aborting a fetch (#27) (Monday, 18 May)
• Re: [fetch] Aborting a fetch (#27) (Friday, 15 May)

Sean Lang

• Re: [manifest] camelCase more suitable to JSON and JS API (#72) (Sunday, 31 May)

Sebastiaan Deckers

• Re: [fetch] Add about:unicorn easter egg. (de21fbc) (Saturday, 23 May)

sirdarckcat

• Re: [ServiceWorker] Should window.caches be removed (or readonly) for security reasons? (#698) (Thursday, 28 May)
• Re: [ServiceWorker] Should window.caches be removed (or readonly) for security reasons? (#698) (Thursday, 28 May)
• Re: [ServiceWorker] How to deal with cookie bombing (#704) (Thursday, 28 May)
• Re: [ServiceWorker] Receivers of ranged responses must ensure all ranges come from the same underlying resource (#703) (Thursday, 28 May)
• [ServiceWorker] Cache API shouldn't be available outside the service workers (#702) (Friday, 22 May)

Sébastien Cevey

• [fetch] Document usage for GET requests with URI parameters (#56) (Wednesday, 27 May)

Tab Atkins Jr.

• Re: [dom] Consider new method: getNodesByType (#37) (Friday, 29 May)
• Re: [dom] Consider new method: getNodesByType (#37) (Thursday, 28 May)
• Re: [dom] Consider new method: getNodesByType (#37) (Thursday, 28 May)
• Re: [spec-reviews] CSS Font Loading (#20) (Friday, 22 May)
• [dom] Add a common conjugation of "case-sensitive" (#33) (Wednesday, 6 May)
• [dom] Export all the terms in the spec, and fix a few definitions/autolinks (#29) (Friday, 1 May)

Takayoshi Kochi

• Re: [webcomponents] [Shadow]: Focus navigation in distributed content (#103) (Thursday, 28 May)

Takeshi Yoshino

• Re: [streams] Readable byte streams should support an internal queue (#353) (Friday, 29 May)
• Re: [streams] Readable byte streams should support an internal queue (#353) (Friday, 29 May)
• [streams] More concrete examples of "optimization" of pipeTo (#359) (Friday, 29 May)
• Re: [streams] Transform streams and acknowledgement of writes (#329) (Friday, 29 May)
• Re: [streams] Transform streams and acknowledgement of writes (#329) (Friday, 29 May)
• Re: [streams] Transform streams and acknowledgement of writes (#329) (Friday, 29 May)
• Re: [streams] Transform streams and acknowledgement of writes (#329) (Friday, 29 May)
• Re: [streams] Transform streams and acknowledgement of writes (#329) (Friday, 29 May)
• Re: [streams] Transform streams and acknowledgement of writes (#329) (Friday, 29 May)
• Re: [streams] Transform streams and acknowledgement of writes (#329) (Friday, 29 May)
• Re: [streams] Readable byte streams should support an internal queue (#353) (Wednesday, 27 May)
• Re: [streams] Readable byte streams should support an internal queue (#353) (Wednesday, 27 May)
• Re: [streams] Readable byte streams should support an internal queue (#353) (Wednesday, 27 May)
• Re: [streams] Readable byte streams should support an internal queue (#353) (Wednesday, 27 May)
• Re: [streams] Readable byte streams should support an internal queue (#353) (Friday, 8 May)
• Re: [streams] Readable byte streams should support an internal queue (#353) (Thursday, 7 May)
• Re: [streams] Readable byte streams should support an internal queue (#353) (Thursday, 7 May)
• Re: [streams] Add descriptions to ReadableStreamController methods (4d5a2a3) (Thursday, 7 May)
• Re: [streams] Update local build instructions (c80e15e) (Thursday, 7 May)
• Re: [streams] Add ReadableByteStream definition (#343) (Friday, 1 May)
• Re: [streams] Add ReadableByteStream definition (#343) (Friday, 1 May)
• Re: [streams] Add ReadableByteStream definition (#343) (Friday, 1 May)
• [streams] Remove closedPromise from ReadableStream's internal slot list (#352) (Friday, 1 May)
• Re: [streams] Add ReadableByteStream definition (#343) (Friday, 1 May)
• Re: [streams] Add ReadableByteStream definition (#343) (Friday, 1 May)
• Re: [streams] Byte streams tracking bug (#300) (Friday, 1 May)
• [streams] Update byte stream spec (#351) (Friday, 1 May)
• Re: [streams] Add tests for checking that tee() branches are errored/closed when the o... (#349) (Friday, 1 May)
• Re: [streams] Add tests for checking that tee() branches are errored/closed when the o... (#349) (Friday, 1 May)

Taylor Hunt

• Re: [manifest] What's the use case for theme_color? (#356) (Tuesday, 12 May)

Tomek Wytrębowicz

• Re: [webcomponents] [Shadow]: Focus navigation in distributed content (#103) (Friday, 29 May)
• Re: [webcomponents] [Shadow]: Focus navigation in distributed content (#103) (Thursday, 28 May)
• Re: [webcomponents] [Shadow]: Focus navigation in distributed content (#103) (Thursday, 28 May)
• Re: [webcomponents] [Shadow]: Focus navigation in distributed content (#103) (Thursday, 28 May)
• Re: [webcomponents] [Shadow]: Focus navigation in distributed content (#103) (Wednesday, 27 May)
• [webcomponents] [Shadow]: Focus navigation in distributed content (#103) (Wednesday, 27 May)

Travis Leithead

• Re: [spec-reviews] CSSOM View document.scrollingElement (#51) (Tuesday, 5 May)
• Re: [permissions] Why "prompt" instead of "default"? (#25) (Monday, 4 May)

Tsuyoshi Horo

• [fetch] CSP Request Header and CORS preflight fetch. (#52) (Friday, 15 May)

Wilson Page

• Re: [webcomponents] [Shadow]: rename <content> to <slot> (bugzilla: 28561) (#92) (Friday, 29 May)
• Re: [webcomponents] [Shadow]: rename <content> to <slot> (bugzilla: 28561) (#92) (Thursday, 28 May)
• [webcomponents] Typo ;) (#54) (Friday, 22 May)

Xabier Rodríguez

• Re: [streams] Added some more readable stream tests (#315) (Thursday, 14 May)

Xiaoqian Cindy Wu

• Re: [webstorage] Make sample code indent consistent (#3) (Thursday, 14 May)

Xidorn Quan

• Re: [fullscreen] Make fullscreenElement and fullscreenEnabled [Replaceable]? (#2) (Thursday, 7 May)

xlaywan

• [dom] Proposal: Node#appendSibling/prependSibling (#38) (Sunday, 31 May)

Yan Zhu

• Re: [spec-reviews] Remove 'signal upgrade' section in upgrade-insecure review (#58) (Tuesday, 19 May)
• Re: [spec-reviews] Strawman spec review for upgrade insecure requests (#54) (Sunday, 10 May)
• [spec-reviews] Remove 'signal upgrade' section in upgrade-insecure review (#58) (Sunday, 10 May)
• Re: [spec-reviews] Upgrade Insecure Requests (#50) (Thursday, 7 May)
• Re: [spec-reviews] Upgrade Insecure Requests (#50) (Thursday, 7 May)
• Re: [spec-reviews] Strawman spec review for upgrade insecure requests (#54) (Thursday, 7 May)
• Re: [spec-reviews] Strawman spec review for upgrade insecure requests (#54) (Thursday, 7 May)
• Re: [spec-reviews] Subresource Integrity (#43) (Thursday, 7 May)
• Re: [spec-reviews] Strawman spec review for upgrade insecure requests (#54) (Thursday, 7 May)
• Re: [spec-reviews] Strawman spec review for upgrade insecure requests (#54) (Wednesday, 6 May)
• Re: [spec-reviews] Strawman spec review for upgrade insecure requests (#54) (Wednesday, 6 May)

Yutaka Hirano

• [streams] Never-released lock / getReader({unreleasable: true}) (#358) (Thursday, 28 May)
• Re: [streams] Add readableStream.locked getter (0c57047) (Tuesday, 19 May)
• Re: [streams] Add readableStream.locked getter (0c57047) (Tuesday, 19 May)
• Re: [streams] Add readableStream.locked getter (0c57047) (Tuesday, 19 May)

Yves Lafon

• Re: [webstorage] w3c stylesheet needs to be httpS (#2) (Tuesday, 12 May)
• Re: [webstorage] Add link to "live" version of the spec. (#1) (Tuesday, 12 May)

Zhiqiang Zhang

• [webstorage] Make sample code indent consistent (#3) (Thursday, 14 May)

zomp

• Re: [encoding] Benefits of "Legacy" Encodings – Byte Counter (#4) (Monday, 25 May)
• Re: [encoding] Benefits of "Legacy" Encodings – Byte Counter (#4) (Tuesday, 19 May)
• Re: [encoding] Benefits of "Legacy" Encodings – Byte Counter (#4) (Tuesday, 19 May)
• [encoding] Benefits of "Legacy" Encodings – Byte Counter (#4) (Tuesday, 19 May)

⭐caitp⭐

• Re: [xhr] Abandon hope of removing sync XHR from the web platform? (#20) (Friday, 29 May)

Last message date: Sunday, 31 May 2015 19:10:21 UTC