- From: Ilya Grigorik <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Tue, 05 May 2015 16:16:07 -0700
- To: whatwg/fetch <fetch@noreply.github.com>
Received on Tuesday, 5 May 2015 23:16:34 UTC
> Well, it already says "should" so user agents have some leeway and I think user agents ought to converge on supported types long term. I'd rather not mention formats that don't have buy in from everyone. Fair enough :+1: > We can mention priorities I suppose. Pointer? Part of the problem with priorities is that I know that e.g. in Gecko we want to do more. We want to not only take into account the context, but also layout information and such. So setting priority in Fetch may be too late. I don't think it's any different from Accept, which may also be set upstream - e.g. through explicit Accept header passed to fetch(). For priority, we could use similar logic: "if requests transport priority is not set, use the request's context to initialize the transport priority", or some such. Perhaps we can just add this as a substep in fetching algorithm - say, between current steps 2-3? --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/whatwg/fetch/issues/43#issuecomment-99257427
Received on Tuesday, 5 May 2015 23:16:34 UTC