- From: Frederico Caldeira Knabben <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Thu, 28 May 2015 04:25:00 -0700
- To: w3c/editing-explainer <editing-explainer@noreply.github.com>
Received on Thursday, 28 May 2015 11:25:27 UTC
When it comes to advanced browser based editing solutions like CKEditor, execCommand is irrelevant. It is not used at all. So I assume that developers of such solutions have zero interest on spec'ing it (option 6). That's in fact my **personal** vote. There may be others instead which could be interested on such API though for cheap editing implementations. I'm appositely not taking them in consideration in my personal vote because I want it to represent a group with specific needs, but it would be wonderful to have them leaving their voice here. --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/w3c/editing-explainer/issues/53#issuecomment-106283764
Received on Thursday, 28 May 2015 11:25:27 UTC