- From: Domenic Denicola <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Fri, 08 May 2015 01:45:26 -0700
- To: whatwg/streams <streams@noreply.github.com>
Received on Friday, 8 May 2015 08:45:52 UTC
@wanderview given > [#](http://krijnhoetmer.nl/irc-logs/whatwg/20150501#l-441) [16:38] <wanderview> Domenic: so, first glance result from this system benchmark is that async-read is roughly equivalent to sync-read+ready-promise... except when the browser is under memory pressure... then the sync-read+ready-promise pulls away... I'm not sure how I feel about that yet and the fact that https://github.com/wanderview/streams-time-echo seems to be using native promises anyway (so that even the under-memory-pressure scenario could possibly be improved with a better promise implementation), where do we stand? --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/whatwg/streams/issues/320#issuecomment-100157546
Received on Friday, 8 May 2015 08:45:52 UTC